There are several packages relevant for the installer that have what looks
like minor problems keeping them from being built on some arches.
- gtk+2.0-directfb (2.0.9.2-12)
Needs to be retried on mipsel; problem should be fixed with new gcc.
- parted (1.6.25.1-1)
Needs to be retried on
Hi,
policy currently mandates FHS 2.1, while FHS 2.3 is the current upstream
version. /srv is not mentioned in FHS 2.1 - but /srv is created by base-files
or debootstrap even in sarge (cannot find it in the code at a quick glance..
the base-files/FAQ says its debotstrap, but whatever..
In
Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How about making porters responsible for running the buildds for their
arch?
I consider anyone who runs a buildd for an arch a porter already so
that
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 01:17:42PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
There are several packages relevant for the installer that have what looks
like minor problems keeping them from being built on some arches.
- gtk+2.0-directfb (2.0.9.2-12)
Needs to be retried on mipsel; problem should be fixed with
On Friday 09 December 2005 17:03, Steve Langasek wrote:
- cdebconf (0.91)
Failed on alpha and ia64 with strange build dep error; a simple
retry may fix this.
No, this is someone trying to be clever and hard-coding a dependency on
libc6 into libgtk+2.0-directfb0. The correct dependency
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The might just be bad porters. Bad dog, BAD.
Then presumably the rest of the porters can replace them?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 01:17:42PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
There are several packages relevant for the installer that have what looks
like minor problems keeping them from being built on some arches.
- anna (1.19)
Will ask Wouter to look into m68k failure (segfault). This seems
7 matches
Mail list logo
