Re: octave-forge FTBFS on hppa

2006-01-02 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 11:11:49AM +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > The ginac package is tied to the KDE ABI transition, and octave-forge > depends on libginac1.3c2a. The octave-forge package will not be able to > enter testing because it is waiting for octave2.1 to build on hppa. > However, oct

Re: C++ transitions breaking libaspell

2006-01-02 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 08:03:24PM -0500, Brian Nelson wrote: > Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 04:36:15PM -0500, Brian Nelson wrote: > >> Can someone please review http://bugs.debian.org/343060 and tell me what > >> to do about it? Several people are claiming

Re: C++ transitions breaking libaspell

2006-01-02 Thread Ming Hua
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 12:05:01AM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 04:36:15PM -0500, Brian Nelson wrote: > > Can someone please review http://bugs.debian.org/343060 and tell me what > > to do about it? Several people are claiming libaspell needs to be > > rebuilt, and in that c

Re: C++ transitions breaking libaspell

2006-01-02 Thread Brian Nelson
Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 04:36:15PM -0500, Brian Nelson wrote: >> Can someone please review http://bugs.debian.org/343060 and tell me what >> to do about it? Several people are claiming libaspell needs to be >> rebuilt, and in that case it would need a pac

Re: C++ transitions breaking libaspell

2006-01-02 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 04:36:15PM -0500, Brian Nelson wrote: > Can someone please review http://bugs.debian.org/343060 and tell me what > to do about it? Several people are claiming libaspell needs to be > rebuilt, and in that case it would need a package name change and yet > another painful lib

C++ transitions breaking libaspell

2006-01-02 Thread Brian Nelson
Can someone please review http://bugs.debian.org/343060 and tell me what to do about it? Several people are claiming libaspell needs to be rebuilt, and in that case it would need a package name change and yet another painful library transition. Obviously I don't want to do this unless absolutely

Re: Please hint openssl 0.9.8a-5 to testing.

2006-01-02 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 09:15:59PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > It still has an open RC bug, which affects testing too. > > Any progress on that RC bug, btw? Unfortuatly not. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PR

octave-forge FTBFS on hppa

2006-01-02 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
The ginac package is tied to the KDE ABI transition, and octave-forge depends on libginac1.3c2a. The octave-forge package will not be able to enter testing because it is waiting for octave2.1 to build on hppa. However, octave2.1 FTBFS on hppa because gnuplot is not available. Looking at the gnuplo