Re: Bug in the testing scripts (?)

2006-02-02 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 07:08:31PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > Santiago Vila wrote: > > I temporarily upgraded Bug#348667 to serious to prevent procmail from > > entering testing (while I try to investigate why in earth this package > > builds with or without biff support depending on the phase of th

Re: Bug in the testing scripts (?)

2006-02-02 Thread Joey Hess
Santiago Vila wrote: > I temporarily upgraded Bug#348667 to serious to prevent procmail from > entering testing (while I try to investigate why in earth this package > builds with or without biff support depending on the phase of the moon), > but the testing monitor says it has just entered testing

Bug in the testing scripts (?)

2006-02-02 Thread Santiago Vila
Hello. I temporarily upgraded Bug#348667 to serious to prevent procmail from entering testing (while I try to investigate why in earth this package builds with or without biff support depending on the phase of the moon), but the testing monitor says it has just entered testing. Is this a bug in t

Re: should packages begin using /srv ?

2006-02-02 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Monday 30 January 2006 18:31, Holger Levsen wrote: > BTW, the fai maintainer said he will wait til this has been resolved before > fixing #340609, #340608, #311524, #315080, #336650. (Which are serious (or > should be) as they are against policy.) FWIW those bugs are also present against F