On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 03:05:52AM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-06 02:55]:
> > > This update hadn't happened on mips/mipsel because Thiemo has been
> > > moving and I wasn't aware of -12. I've compiled this on mips and
> > > mipsel a few days ago
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-06 02:55]:
> > This update hadn't happened on mips/mipsel because Thiemo has been
> > moving and I wasn't aware of -12. I've compiled this on mips and
> > mipsel a few days ago, made udebs and uploaded everything to the
> > archive.
>
> It would be
Holger Levsen wrote:
>> * Unfortunatly, nobody from the kernel team is really interested in
>> working on 2.4 anymore. They do security fixes for the 2.4 kernels
>> in woody and sarge, for which I'm very thankful, but that's about it.
>>
>> Even though 2.4 is moving very slowly nowada
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 03:57:45PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sunday 29 January 2006 00:30, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > There are several reasons why 2.4 is still interesting:
> > - Kernel 2.6 is still a moving target...
>
> As Marco d'Itri pointed out, this will stay this way,
On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 09:38:01PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 06:47:28PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
>
> >As I understand it, xorg-x11 6.9 hasn't transitioned to testing due to
> > #211765, which remains the only RC bug in the package. This is a licensing
> > bug th
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 03:56:01AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 06:41:24PM +0100, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> > Current lesstif2 was built on arm with an old version of xft installed
> > that still shipped an .la file and therefore picked it up in its own .la
> > files. xft ver
On Sunday 05 February 2006 15:57, Holger Levsen wrote:
> hhpa has dropped 2.4 support for sarge... s390 also doesnt seem
> sensible.
2.6 support for S/390 has missing pieces (mainly hardware configuration
stuff). Waldi has been working on this recently, but a full switch to 2.6
is not yet an opt
Hi,
On Sunday 29 January 2006 00:30, Holger Levsen wrote:
> There are several reasons why 2.4 is still interesting:
> - Kernel 2.6 is still a moving target...
As Marco d'Itri pointed out, this will stay this way, so I'm confirmed, that
some people will continue to want to use 2.4 instead
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 06:41:24PM +0100, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> Current lesstif2 was built on arm with an old version of xft installed
> that still shipped an .la file and therefore picked it up in its own .la
> files. xft version 2.1.8.2-1 no longer ship this file, though, which
> leads to FTBFS
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 09:20:13AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> although tetex-base is 11 days old, it has not entered testing. I have
> been told previously that the scripts should now be clever enough to
> detect that it has to go in with tetex-bin in one run without manual
> hinting, so what's
10 matches
Mail list logo
