On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 09:08:22PM +0100, Mark Purcell wrote:
On Thursday 20 April 2006 16:36, David L. Moreno wrote:
File /usr/lib/libXrender.la is no longer provided by libxrender-dev
package (See bug #362777). However, libkipi-dev is compiled with an
old version of libxrender-dev, so it
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 10:36:16PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
[Cced the victi^Wpotential assistents this time - next time get it from the
list :]
Hi guys,
Your first assignment, should you choose to accept it, is to solve the
following bugs:
Speaking of which, since this seems like as
On 2006-04-21, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately not. The candidate set of affected packages is all packages
which transitively build-depend on libxrender-dev or libxcursor-dev and ship
=2Ela files. A very irritating set to calculate...
I have now on my machine sort of
Hello Wichert,
I'd like to see #329467 fixed in the next stable point release, since
the fix is pretty trivial.
Would you mind upload a new version to proposed-update ?
Cheers,
--
Julien Danjou
// [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://julien.danjou.info
// 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE
* Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060421 02:21]:
2) Get these acked by SRM so they actually show up in s-p-u; s-p-u already
has debian-installer sections, I'm not sure if the acceptance queue
and approval stuff supports udebs though (aj?)
It does - however, you have to wait with uploading
tor, 20,.04.2006 kl. 16.25 -0700, skrev Steve Langasek:
I'm not sure of this. I haven't done a comprehensive review of the
packages
currently using /usr/X11R6/bin to make sure none of these packages use
GNOME
libs; if any do, and if the packages are significant, a GNOME shlibs
Title: Great offer(now hiring...)._ALEX777
Hi ,
meine Frau, mit der ich 5 Jahre gelebt hatte, hat mich betrogen.
Dafr zeige ich ihre Aktfotos aus unserem privaten Fotoalbum.
Alle sollen sie nackt sehen.
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 05:58:43PM +0200, Heikki Henriksen wrote:
tor, 20,.04.2006 kl. 16.25 -0700, skrev Steve Langasek:
I'm not sure of this. I haven't done a comprehensive review of the
packages
currently using /usr/X11R6/bin to make sure none of these packages use
GNOME
8 matches
Mail list logo