On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 09:08:08PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> Please also update the current hint (vorlon) for installation-report. A
> new upload with a very minor change was done due to a misunderstanding.
> unblock installation-report/2.23
> urgent installation-report/2.23
> There has also bee
> AFAIKT this has not happened yet. Please approve ASAP as otherwise RC1 may
> get delayed further, or this change will miss RC1.
> The new version fixes the sort order of keymaps during keyboard selection
> which I'd very much like to see in RC1.
> The reason I suggested a review is that Christi
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 11:34:24AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> No, I just like to know what we're trying to achieve before starting to
> do anything.
>
> Okay, so the idea is:
>
> (a) move m68k from etch to testing-m68k
>
> (b) automatically promote m68k packages from unstable to testing-m
Package: cryptsetup
Version: 1.0.4~rc2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Hi,
cryptsetup contains a patch for po/Makefile, which is generated from
Makefile.in during build. The problem now is that the resulting
Makefile differs between a build on etch and a build on s
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 01:50:06 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> I noticed several RC bugfixes, which were uploaded with urgency=low.
> You might want to check, whether these should be bumped: (I've left
> out cases, where a new upstream has been incorporated)
>
> 384243 numerix 0.22-3
The RC
On Saturday 28 October 2006 00:43, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > # This one should probably be checked by RMs, but is very welcome for
> > RC1 # as it fixes some keyboard issues in the installer
> > unblock console-data/2:1.01-1
> > urgent console-data/2:1.01-1
>
> Will review later.
AFAIKT this has n
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 09:50:44PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Bug #394418 is a report filed regarding a recurring build problem with mono
> on arm that results from mono generating code that's incompatible with the
> arm v3 instruction set. Likewise, it appears shadow fails to buil
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 01:40:03AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> Hello,
>
> 3.0.4-10 includes a workaround for apparently a lot of devices out that that
> like to hand out an MTU of 64, so this should probably make Etch.
dhcp3 | 3.0.4-10 | testing | source
Already done by Steve Lan
Hello,
3.0.4-10 includes a workaround for apparently a lot of devices out that that
like to hand out an MTU of 64, so this should probably make Etch.
regards
Andrew
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
gcc-4.1 4.1.1-19 in unstable now looks like not showing build time
regressions compared to 4.1.1-13 in testing, validated on amd64.
Lucas Nussbaum volunteered to build testing from 2006-10-24 with -13
and -17, the results can be found at [1]. The failures are detailed
below and supposed to be fixe
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 12:26:32PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 09:11:58PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> >> Hi Jeroen,
> >>
> >> Here's the list of udeb-only packages to be synced to testing:
> >>
> >> [...]
> >
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 09:11:58PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
>> Hi Jeroen,
>>
>> Here's the list of udeb-only packages to be synced to testing:
>>
>> [...]
>
> all done, except:
>
>> debian-installer-utils
>
> Out of date on arm,
>
> di-utils
12 matches
Mail list logo
