Please unblock console-data 2:1.01-5

2006-12-17 Thread Christian Perrier
Two days after requestin an unblock for 1:1.01-4, we got a new translation of keymap names, in teh Tamil language. Such translations are directly visible in D-I, so getting this in Etch is important for the Tamil-localized installer. I uploaded 1:1.01-5 yesterday with this only change. It of

Re: kfocus: unfreeze request

2006-12-17 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 12:27:42PM +, Mark Purcell wrote: Request kfocus be unfrozen to allow 1.0.2-16 into etch. * echo 4 debian/compat * Switch to cdbs No. These are not changes to be making during a freeze. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a

Re: zaptel: unfreeze request

2006-12-17 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 12:39:02PM +, Mark Purcell wrote: It it requested to unfreeze zaptel to allow 1:1.2.11.dfsg-1 into etch. This version was uploaded before the freeze. Accepted for this reason only. Otherwise, there would be more changes here than could be reasonably reviewed. BTW,

Please allow mkvmlinuz 29 into testing.

2006-12-17 Thread Sven Luther
Hi, ... Please allow mkvmlinuz 29 into testing. The changes are not important, they allow for linux 2.6.19+ to work, which will be nice for people wanting to build their own kernels in etch, and is very nice for my own experiments right now. No known regresions affect the pre 2.6.19 case.

Re: please unblock scilab

2006-12-17 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 03:19:36PM +0100, Torsten Werner wrote: On 12/15/06, Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Of course you should upload that to unstable. Done, but it contains 3 extra minor fixes: - change a comment - enable debugging symbols which is useful when the build fails -

Re: please unblock scilab

2006-12-17 Thread Torsten Werner
On 12/17/06, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Appears to have been unblocked by Andi. Thanks! Autobuilding non-free packages still takes a long time, though. Cheers, Torsten -- blog: http://twerner.blogspot.com/ homepage: http://www.twerner42.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Re: Please push gnujump and gnujump-data in Etch (was: Re: Package name change)

2006-12-17 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 08:05:46PM +0100, Bas Wijnen wrote: If so, I would tend towards renaming now, but this must be weighed against the possible confusion to users by making available a version of gnujump that never existed upstream. Well, the upstream source is currently available from

Re: Scheduling linux-2.6 2.6.18-9

2006-12-17 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Frederik, On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 06:08:08PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote: I would like to schedule the upload of the next linux-2.6 2.6.18 version, with the following changes: 1. new vserver patch, breaks ABI 2. new Xen patch 3. Activate PAE on i386 Xen subarch, breaks ABI 4. arm

Re: Scheduling linux-2.6 2.6.18-9

2006-12-17 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 11:32:54PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Frederik Schueler wrote: If you have any last minute changes which are that important they cannot=20 wait for the first point release kernel, please list them here so we can discuss them. The 2.6.18.6 stable series

Re: openc++ and skribe for etch

2006-12-17 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 11:23:23PM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote: I'd like to get openc++ and skribe considered for re-migration to testing. I would think those two packages can be qualified as having missed the freeze only for reasons outside of the control of the maintainers :) - openc++

maint-guide, debiandoc-sgml updated

2006-12-17 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, Since it was FTBFS release critical bug, I focused on it and uploaded fixes as new maint-guide and new debiandoc-sgml today with proprity high. These should be included for release, please. Since then I had time to fix source for existing BTS report with sure patches. Should I upload these

Please, migrate tclxml-3.1-2 to Etch

2006-12-17 Thread Fernando Ike de Oliveira
Hi, Please, consider migrate tclxml-3.1-2 to Etch, because grave bug (#402791) fix of empty directories bin and sbin. This package only library directories and that they were not in the previous package. Kind regards, -- Fernando Ike de Oliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc

Please unblock loop-aes-utils 2.12r-15

2006-12-17 Thread Max Vozeler
Hello release team, this version includes a documentation fix (README.Debian, NEWS.Debian). The documentation mentioned a feature that we decided to postpone until after etch; It would be great if you could let this version into testing. cheers, Max diff -u loop-aes-utils-2.12r/debian/changelog

will you allow a new em8300 in?

2006-12-17 Thread Nicolas Boullis
Hi, One month ago, em8300 was removed from testing, because of #342377, with the following comment from Steve Langasek: # long-standing brokenness, can get back in if maintainer gets the new upstream version packaged Now, a package for the new upstream version is mostly packages (I'd still

Re: lightspeed

2006-12-17 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 11:11:14PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 06:40:13AM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote: On this page http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?excuse=lightspeed I can see that your unblock is invalidated by some library issue, but I can not really

Re: Scheduling linux-2.6 2.6.18-9

2006-12-17 Thread Max Vozeler
Hi Sven, On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 01:53:36PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: Why is loop-aes not part of the official module packages ? Mostly because we have not yet found the time to complete the integration. Note that the package uses linux-support-$KVERS, so it is already easy to rebuild for ABI

Re: Scheduling linux-2.6 2.6.18-9

2006-12-17 Thread Max Vozeler
Hi all, On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 02:43:57AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 06:08:08PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote: This update bears 3 ABI breaking changes. While the vserver patch might be adaptable, the PAE migration of i386 Xen is not. But we need this change as

Re: Scheduling linux-2.6 2.6.18-9

2006-12-17 Thread Sven Luther
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 01:53:03PM +0100, Max Vozeler wrote: Hi all, On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 02:43:57AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 06:08:08PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote: This update bears 3 ABI breaking changes. While the vserver patch might be adaptable,

Re: openc++ and skribe for etch

2006-12-17 Thread Yann Dirson
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 03:21:16AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 11:23:23PM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote: - openc++ (non-free) has not migrated because no non-free buildd has produced binaries for s390 (and m68k) yet, so the previous version from main is blocking the

Re: Please unblock xorg-docs

2006-12-17 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Please unblock xorg-docs and allow it to migrate to etch. This upload includes the following changes: Unblocked. Marc -- BOFH #83: Support staff hung over, send aspirin and come back LATER. pgpupqkO5F5Q8.pgp Description: PGP signature

Please hint nozomi-source 2.1-2 for etch (Closes #390427)

2006-12-17 Thread Martin Wuertele
Hi! Please let nozomi-source 2.1-2 enter etch. -2 closes #390427 and it would be nice to have the GPRS/EDGE/UMTS/HSDPA drivers in the upcoming stable release. yours Martin -- http://martin.wuertele.net/ -- Debian -- OFTC -- SPI -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] dnges führts eigentlcih zu irgendwelchen

Re: kernel-patch-openvz

2006-12-17 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi again Sorry to disturb, but now I have made a new version that I have uploaded to testing-proposed-updates. The reason for that is that I will soon upload a new version to unstable as well. On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 11:26:06PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 06:42:27AM

asking to upload fai 3.1.3 to unstable (it should go into testing)

2006-12-17 Thread Thomas Lange
Dear release team, I like to ask for permission to upload fai 3.1.3 to unstable which should be hinted into etch after the usual waiting period. The new version fixes three bugs (one in a manpage) and corrects one example in the documentation as well: fai (3.1.3) unstable; urgency=medium *

Re: Please allow xmoto 0.2.2-2 in testing

2006-12-17 Thread Samuel Mimram
Hi, Samuel Mimram wrote: Could you please allow xmoto 0.2.2-2 in testing? Currently testing has 0.2.2-1 and the only difference between them is a patch that corrects the url where to download new levels for the game (upstream has moved his website). The xmoto package has been unblocked,

nano update request

2006-12-17 Thread Jordi Mallach
Hey release team, I uploaded nano 2.0.1 a while ago to unstable which had minor code changes for the bugs that cropped up in 2.0. Also, there was a number of translation updates. There's a segfault and memleak fixes in CVS that I can apply to 2.0.1 and upload to unstable if there's chances of

Re: gcj-4.1_4.1.1-20 and gcc-4.1_4.1.1-21 for testing

2006-12-17 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 11/12/06 at 09:14 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: Please consider for testing: gcc-4.1: 4.1.1ds2-20 is for four weeks in the archive without regressions report to the BTS, -21 fixes important bugs for non-release archs. Maybe Lucas could rebuild the testing archive with the -20 or -21

Re: Please unblock xorg-docs

2006-12-17 Thread David Nusinow
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 05:23:38PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Please unblock xorg-docs and allow it to migrate to etch. This upload includes the following changes: Unblocked. Great, thank you HE. - David Nusinow -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Please allow checkinstall in testing

2006-12-17 Thread Felipe Sateler
After the usual 10 days for low priority packages (which are due today[1]), I'd like checkinstall to progagate into testing. This is because Sarge shipped with a version of checkinstall (1.5.3-3), and after it's release an RC bug[2] was filed against it and later on removed from testing. The

Re: tla 1.3.5+dfsg-8 MIGRATED to testing

2006-12-17 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 08:03:24PM -0600, Adam Majer wrote: Err, why was this tla pushed to Etch? I thought Etch was frozen. Because seeing that the version in unstable depended on libneon26-gnutls, I mistakenly assumed that the version in testing was similarly linked and therefore an update was

Re: Please allow gcc-doc-defaults 4.1.1.nf3 into etch

2006-12-17 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 03:37:48PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: - If you have a package that needs updating, *please* don't forget to contact us. *Don't expect us to find out about it on our own*. Please allow gcc-doc-defaults 4.1.1.nf3 into etch. This upload fixes RC bug

Re: xterm upload to testing (#349462)

2006-12-17 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 21:23:10 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: As a targetted fix, yes, I would accept this in t-p-u. Thanks Steve, xterm 222-1etch1 has now been uploaded to t-p-u. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Coordinating to let some TeX-related packages in: texlive-bin

2006-12-17 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi Andreas, hi Release Team! On Don, 14 Dez 2006, Andreas Barth wrote: On Die, 12 Dez 2006, Andreas Barth wrote: * Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061211 20:06]: [..] textlive-bin approved. Thanks a lot, but it seems that you have set the unblock to the -6 version, which

please allow freeradius 1.1.3-3 into etch

2006-12-17 Thread Stephen Gran
It is not yet ready to migrate, having only been uploaded last night. However, knowing myself, I will forget to write this email in a few days when it is actually ready. Can you please unblock the new version, as it fixes a policy bug with a one line change? Complete interdiff is: Index:

Re: Please allow dwm 2.1-3

2006-12-17 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 04:37:13PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: diff -u dwm-2.1/debian/changelog dwm-2.1/debian/changelog --- dwm-2.1/debian/changelog +++ dwm-2.1/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +dwm (2.1-3) testing; urgency=medium + + * For consistency, renamed 99-utf.dpatch to

Re: Coordinating to let some TeX-related packages in: texlive-bin

2006-12-17 Thread Frank Küster
Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is something going on which I do not understand: the execuses page texlive-bin tells me that it is waiting for libpng, but this one is in freeze. And indeed, it has a dependency on libpng12-0 (= 1.2.15~beta5). But this dependency is somehow only

Re: Coordinating to let some TeX-related packages in: texlive-bin

2006-12-17 Thread Andreas Barth
* Norbert Preining ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061218 02:07]: There is something going on which I do not understand: the execuses page texlive-bin tells me that it is waiting for libpng, but this one is in freeze. And indeed, it has a dependency on libpng12-0 (= 1.2.15~beta5). But this dependency is