On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 02:41:45AM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
PS: I don't like hardcoded lists of languages in Makefiles, maybe something to
look into?
Maybe, the fact is that only rarely new languages are added here, and we also
want the feature to not publish a given language in CVS (because it
Hi Michal,
On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 03:35:41PM +0100, Michal Čihař wrote:
can you please allow mpdscribble 0.2.12-1 to enter testing? It fixes
few problems with protocol implementation (one such problem is
important bug #396778. Here is changelog:
mpdscribble (0.2.12-1) unstable; urgency=low
Hi,
gedit has been waiting for testing transition for a few days because of
a missing arm build, however it is reported [1] as being successfully
built.
Does anyone know what is wrong?
[1] http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=armpkg=geditver=2.14.4-5
--
.''`.
: :' : We are
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 11:03:58AM -0200, Fabiano Manoel de Andrade [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
The totem-mozila version was 2.16.4-2. /usr/lib/firefox was a symbolic
link to iceweasel directory.
Fabiano.
This whole issue might be related to the fact that /usr/lib/firefox is a
symlink to
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 12:14:23PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 11:03:58AM -0200, Fabiano Manoel de Andrade [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
The totem-mozila version was 2.16.4-2. /usr/lib/firefox was a symbolic
link to iceweasel directory.
Fabiano.
This whole issue
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 03:22:37AM -0800, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
To my eye, I think it would be much better to drop the /usr/lib/firefox
symlink. I wholly expect that people will want to install third-party
firefox packages, maybe even alongside the iceweasel package, and
Hi there, I've prepared a prboom 2:2.4.6+dfsg-1 package
which has been uploaded to unstable (thanks Moritz
Muehlenhoff). This fixes RC bug #404826 (non-free material
in main):
prboom (2:2.4.6+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=high
.
* Remove ID-copyright material from prboom.wad
Closes: #404826
Hi Santiago,
On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 08:29:31PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
The Debian changelog does not say much:
tre (0.7.5-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release. See the NEWS file for details.
* Added Milan Zamazal to the Uploaders field, as backup maintainer.
--
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 02:25:19PM +0800, Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) wrote:
The newer version of sox fix some important bugs.
Some of them causes segmentation faults.
New upstream version; doesn't qualify for a freeze exception under the
release team policy.
The contents of most of the files
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 06:22:38PM +1100, Mark Purcell wrote:
As discussed on debian-release,
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-kde-extras/2006-December/002193.html
digikam digikamimageplugins has now been reverted to versions 0.8.2 in
unstable. With the 0.9.0 upstream release
Hi Andi, Hi Steve,
[Just returned from my honeymoon, still feeling relaxed about the uclibc
package, which used to give me the shivers ;-) ]
Am Donnerstag, 28. Dezember 2006 13:22 schrieb Andreas Barth:
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061228 13:16]:
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 05:12:29PM
Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
gedit has been waiting for testing transition for a few days because of
a missing arm build, however it is reported [1] as being successfully
built.
Does anyone know what is wrong?
I suspect that this may have to do with the problems after
Ola Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Without the changes the vzmigrate tool do not work on Debian
systems.
The following changes have been made:
* Documentation link (not that important but safe)
* vzmigrate update, important in order for it to work
* Added dependency on vzquota as it in
Hi,
Daniel Leidert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This package version fixes a long list of bugs:
docbook-xsl (1.71.0.dfsg.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium
I see no bugs in the Debian BTS are fixed by this upload, but the diff
is quite long and not really reviewable. I don't think that this upload
I've uploaded new apticron that fixes a minor debconf translation bug that was
causing problem for l10n team:
apticron (1.1.20) unstable; urgency=low
* Fix problem with debconf pt translation. Thanks to Christian Perrier.
(Closes: #403494)
-- Tiago Bortoletto Vaz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt a écrit :
Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
gedit has been waiting for testing transition for a few days because of
a missing arm build, however it is reported [1] as being successfully
built.
Does anyone know what is wrong?
I suspect that this may have to
Hi,
I just fix #382252 of severity 'serious'. I would like the fix
to go to testing (and etch). However :
- the testing version is 0.9.1-1
- the unstable version is (will be in a few hours) 0.9.3-2
ie: there has been a new upstream version since the freeze
I know you discourage new upstream
Package: wengophone
Version: 2.0.0~rc5-svn8108-3
Severity: grave
I've told to some persons to test the wengophone package included in
testing, and i've received a very bad result.
No one of them was using it without varius segfault and random weird
things, so i think wengophone isn't
Vincent Danjean [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I know you discourage new upstream versions, however I would like
you to make an exception here. Mercurial is a new source control
version system (it does not exist in stable), so it changes quickly.
Have you reviewed every single line of the diff of
Luk Claes wrote:
Unblocked.
thanks.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Am Mittwoch, den 03.01.2007, 14:10 +0100 schrieb Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt:
Daniel Leidert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This package version fixes a long list of bugs:
docbook-xsl (1.71.0.dfsg.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium
I see no bugs in the Debian BTS are fixed by this upload,
No newly
Daniel Leidert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Am Mittwoch, den 03.01.2007, 14:10 +0100 schrieb Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt:
Daniel Leidert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't think that this upload matches the criteria we have set for
freeze exceptions.
I don't know, which criteria has been violated
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt a écrit :
Vincent Danjean [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I know you discourage new upstream versions, however I would like
you to make an exception here. Mercurial is a new source control
version system (it does not exist in stable), so it changes quickly.
Have you
Am Mittwoch, den 03.01.2007, 18:38 +0100 schrieb Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt:
Daniel Leidert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Am Mittwoch, den 03.01.2007, 14:10 +0100 schrieb Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt:
Daniel Leidert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't think that this upload matches the criteria we have set
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt a écrit :
Vincent Danjean [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In short, I would prefer you accept mercurial 0.9.3-2 and
tailor 0.9.27-1 in testing. If you do not, I will prepare
a fix for #382252 for mercurial 0.9.1 and submit it to you.
I would prefer this.
I've just
Hi,
the current kqemu package in testing suffers from having no proper
creation of the /dev/kqemu device. The -5 revision fixes this and
slightly updates README.Debian.
Please unblock it, debdiff is attached.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 07:27:43PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi. Please consider removing lukemftp from etch. It has been renamed
upstream to tnftp and is included in etch with the new name. I believe
lukemftp should actually be removed completely from Debian and replaced
with a
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 10:02:31PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
Hi,
the current kqemu package in testing suffers from having no proper
creation of the /dev/kqemu device. The -5 revision fixes this and
slightly updates README.Debian.
Please unblock it, debdiff is attached.
no, that
Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
the current kqemu package in testing suffers from having no proper
creation of the /dev/kqemu device. The -5 revision fixes this and
slightly updates README.Debian.
Your handling of the udev rules stinks.
Scenario:
- module package for the 2.6.18
Please get this fix/build into Etch:
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/sisu/sisu_0.48.8-6.dsc
The differences between this and the previous submission for upload
request [which was 0.48.8-4] are:
(a) * sisu-pdf texlive dependency adjusted on feedback from Norbert Preining
(Closes:
Hi,
Please unblock msttcorefonts/1.6, it updates a debconf po translation.
Thanks to Mario Scheel for providing that. Debdiff attached.
Thanks!
Thijs
diff -Nru /tmp/S8j38A4uZ1/msttcorefonts-1.5/debian/changelog /tmp/oH8ygs2GW0/msttcorefonts-1.6/debian/changelog
---
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
no, that cannot be done, your code is completely RC buggy, and IMHO
broken in the design anyway.
because then someone cries 'iih, i don't use udev, go away with these
files'?
but well, if this is can be ignored, then i of course change that.
--
Address:Daniel
On 1/3/07, Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
because then someone cries 'iih, i don't use udev, go away with these
files'?
You can use ucf to create config files conditionally.
Regards,
Torsten
--
blog: http://twerner.blogspot.com/
homepage: http://www.twerner42.de/
--
To
Hi,
the current kqemu package in testing suffers from having a broken
creation of the /dev/kqemu device. The -6 revision removes the device
creation completely, slightly updates README.Debian and documents the
steps to create the device manually in README.device.
Please unblock it, debdiff is
Daniel Baumann wrote:
the current kqemu package in testing suffers from having a broken
creation of the /dev/kqemu device. The -6 revision removes the device
creation completely, slightly updates README.Debian and documents the
steps to create the device manually in README.device.
Just
Josselin Mouette wrote:
Just wondering: why shipping a Debian package at all if half of the work
remains to be done after installing it?
Because I don't want to have a build-enviroment for the module on my
system where I use it. YMMV.
Besides, one could just fixed #400788 and be done with it.
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 10:14:30AM -0300, Tiago Bortoletto Vaz wrote:
I've uploaded new apticron that fixes a minor debconf translation bug that
was causing problem for l10n team:
apticron (1.1.20) unstable; urgency=low
* Fix problem with debconf pt translation. Thanks to Christian
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 12:57:25PM +, Rene Mayrhofer wrote:
[Just returned from my honeymoon, still feeling relaxed about the uclibc
package, which used to give me the shivers ;-) ]
Congrats. :)
Am Donnerstag, 28. Dezember 2006 13:22 schrieb Andreas Barth:
It appears that uclibc
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 03:05:17PM +0100, Vincent Danjean wrote:
I just fix #382252 of severity 'serious'.
I've just downgraded that bug, I think the severity was incorrect; AIUI it
only applies when upgrading from old, unreleased versions of the package.
The change in t-p-u is small enough
Hi,
beatle MrCooper: do you think it'd be worth to try to fix bug 394311
for etch? or would it be considered too intrusive?
MrCooper how is building with safe compiler flags intrusive? :)
beatle hmm... perhaps it should be NMU'd then
* vorlon pre-emptively grants a freeze exception
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 07:13:23PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
| - fixes for severity: important bugs in packages of priority: optional
|or extra, only when this can be done via unstable;
Well. So I have to start to copy every bug reported to upstream to
Debian BTS and then I apply to
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 04:42:59PM +0100, Ricardo Mones wrote:
If ensuring a smooth transition includes that apt-get upgrade/dist-upgrade
does the package switching then as I understand it only a Provides: with the
old package name would be required in each new package. That's currently not
Per Steve Langasek's permission at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2006/09/msg00224.html
please unblock
Source: debram
Package: debram
Package: debram-data
Version: 1.0.3
to permit them to enter etch. This is the only such
upload; no further updates are planned.
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 03:35:57PM -0800, Sebastien Delafond wrote:
On the other hand, I just diffed the code between 0.1.5.1 and the CVS
version as of today (which I packaged this morning), and it's only
58 lines (attached). If I had to guess, I'd say the last chunk is what
fixes the problem
Please consider allowing xprint 1:1.1.99.3+git20060910-8 into etch.
The only change from -7 is the addition of a spanish debconf translation
(po file).
Thanks,
Drew
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 02:25:40PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
I'm forwarding a message from the upstream author of nss-mdns; he
recommends pushing the new upstream release of this library to fix
Debian bug #404266.
This release also introduces a change to not honor the search domains
of
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 12:10:30AM +0100, Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Josselin Mouette wrote:
Just wondering: why shipping a Debian package at all if half of the work
remains to be done after installing it?
Because I don't want to have a build-enviroment for the module on my
Hello,
Summary: in #354355, it has been reported that the current version in etch
is the same than in sarge and it's so severly outdated that upstream can
no longer support it security wise and that upstream developers would
prefer having no sympa package at all instead of having this outdated
48 matches
Mail list logo
