Romain Beauxis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le samedi 24 février 2007 17:02, vous avez écrit :
Frank, if you think this can be solved cleanly in mediawiki1.7 why don't
you just put up a complete patch instead of only one of the things to do
? If then it looks good, I would apply it happily.
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 09:25:42AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
You say that while later on you claimed not to understand everything about
the
package (update script). Don't you have the impression that this judgement
is
also based on incomplete information on the package ?
Of
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 09:39:46AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
I'll let the RMs decide whether iceape and icedove upgrades are less
problematic since they don't involve reverse dependencies.
Less problematic, certainly.
Hopefully these updates
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 09:25:42AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
You say that while later on you claimed not to understand everything about
the
package (update script). Don't you have the impression that this judgement
is
also based on
Moin,
please unblock mixmaster 3.0b2-4. It consists mainly of i18n changes,
prepared by Christian Perrier. The only other change is that the list
of reliability information sources was updated.
| mixmaster (3.0b2-4) unstable; urgency=low
|
| [ Christian Perrier ]
| * Switch to po-debconf
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 03:20:37PM +0100, Daniel Kobras wrote:
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 07:32:39PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
* Rebuild with --without-dv1394 instead of --with-dv1394 (closes: 406670)
This is obviously a change with non-local effects. Is this going to break
anything
Hi Marc,
thanks for your answer.
2007/2/26, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Arnaud Quette [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've used some unstable uploads to ask for users tests, and also test
the builds since it contains a significant change (upstream release).
And that's exactly why I
Hi,
RHEL updated seamonkey and seamonkey-nss from 1.0.7 to 1.0.8 and this
caused quite a lot of breakage: evolution no longer started and gaim
crashes.
I hope Debian is more carefull with their (mozilla) updates :-). But I'm
quite confident (Debian's QA is good, IMHO RHEL doesn't seem to
Hello,
I goofed on applying security patches in 0.99.4-4 (currently in etch);
please unblock 0.99.4-5 (uploaded with priority high this morning,
already built fine on most archs).
hand-made debdiff:
--- debian/patches/00list
+ 12_secu_0.99.5_r19859.dpatch
+ 12_secu_0.99.5_r19899.dpatch
+
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 02:09:59PM +0100, Rik Theys wrote:
Hi,
RHEL updated seamonkey and seamonkey-nss from 1.0.7 to 1.0.8 and this
caused quite a lot of breakage: evolution no longer started and gaim
crashes.
Thanks for the info.
I think we should double check that those applications
Version 0.99.18-8.etch.3 of the jed packages has been uploaded to unstable.
Please, consider allowing it into testing. The only change in respect to
the version currently in testing (0.99.18-8) is the inclusion of the
Galician translation of the debconf templates (closes: #412519, diffs
attached
Please hint nslu2-utils/0.10+r71-9 for testing. This package has an
initramfs-tools hook that will parse /etc/fstab and write the root
device to the initramfs. This is needed in order to boot on this
machine since the boot loader doesn't provide a root= cmd line.
We have seen quite a few
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 02:09:59PM +0100, Rik Theys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
RHEL updated seamonkey and seamonkey-nss from 1.0.7 to 1.0.8 and this
caused quite a lot of breakage: evolution no longer started and gaim
crashes.
Interesting, considering 1.0.8 is still at release candidate
Hi,
with this e-mail I am asking to schedule an i386 binNMU for
python-scipy.
This is due to the fact that the package I uploaded was built on an host
with a lot of packages from experimental, and as result it has a
dependency on lib6 that cannot be satisfied on unstable.
python-scipy_0.5.2-7,
Dear release team,
I have just uploaded a NMU of belocs-locales-bin, to fix its pending l10n
issues (and, if needed, very minor QA issues).
Could you consider hinting it to enter testing?
The NMU changelog is:
Source: belocs-locales-bin
Version: 2.4-2.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Hello,
I have uploaded a reduced bouml 2.19.2-2 to mentors.debian.net:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bouml/bouml_2.19.2-2.dsc
It fixes crashes only. Here is the complete changelog:
bouml (2.19.2-2) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low
* Backport crash fixes. Closes:
Could you please allow fltk1.1 1.1.7-3 into etch once its waiting
period runs out? As the attached interdiff shows, it merely adds one
new translation and bumps the Standards-Version: field.
I don't normally read -release, so please *do* copy me when replying
(per the M-C-T and M-F-T headers,
Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have just uploaded a NMU of belocs-locales-bin, to fix its pending l10n
issues (and, if needed, very minor QA issues).
Unblocked.
Marc
--
BOFH #363:
Out of cards on drive D:
pgpYllMCh8Sd3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please hint nslu2-utils/0.10+r71-9 for testing.
Unblocked.
Marc
--
BOFH #216:
What office are you in? Oh, that one. Did you know that your
building was built over the universities first nuclear research site? And wow,
are'nt you the lucky one, your
Rafael Laboissiere [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Version 0.99.18-8.etch.3 of the jed packages has been uploaded to unstable.
Please, consider allowing it into testing. The only change in respect to
the version currently in testing (0.99.18-8) is the inclusion of the
Galician translation of the
Frederic Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I goofed on applying security patches in 0.99.4-4 (currently in etch);
please unblock 0.99.4-5 (uploaded with priority high this morning,
already built fine on most archs).
Unblocked.
Marc
--
BOFH #183:
filesystem not big enough for Jumbo Kernel
Andrew McMillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have just uploaded a new release 0.3.31 of whereami. Unfortunately,
due to an oversight on my part, I notice that 0.3.30 also never got
uploaded.
| diff -Nru /tmp/qpzj5f816b/whereami-0.3.29/debian/rules
/tmp/Kw0yU5sM8K/whereami-0.3.31/debian/rules
Am Sonntag, 25. Februar 2007 01:42 schrieb Steve Langasek:
Either to testing (as currently marked in the changelog), or, with the
testing-security team's permission, to testing-security.
Daniel has uploaded the new packages to tpu. Please initiate
the necessary steps to get them into unstable
Hi!
A new version of wide-dhcpv6 has been uploaded to unstable a few days ago. Could
you please let it enter etch?
Changelog entry:
wide-dhcpv6 (20061016-2) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/control: added lsb-base as a dependency.
* debian/patches:
- Added
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 08:23:42AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt a écrit :
Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have just uploaded a NMU of fdutils, to fix its pending l10n
issues (and, if needed, very minor QA issues).
Could you consider hinting it to
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 04:26:28PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
[debian-release: This mail serves as both an NMU diff an an unblock request.
Please review and unblock.]
Unblocked.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 23:27 +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Andrew McMillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have just uploaded a new release 0.3.31 of whereami. Unfortunately,
due to an oversight on my part, I notice that 0.3.30 also never got
uploaded.
| diff -Nru
2 weeks ago I opened 6 bugs againt language-env. 3 of these are at least
important. I asked in #410612 whether it could be upgraded to serious,
but the maintainers do not seem to be responsive and did not reply,
which means these bugs will most likely affect Etch if the release team
doesn't
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 08:46:02AM +0100, Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 08:57:19PM -0800, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 09:39:46AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
I'll let the RMs decide whether iceape and icedove upgrades are less
Dear release team,
I have just uploaded a NMU of htdig, to fix its pending l10n
issues (and, if needed, very minor QA issues).
Could you consider hinting it to enter testing?
The NMU changelog is:
Source: htdig
Version: 1:3.2.0b6-3.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christian
Dear release team,
I have just uploaded a NMU of ax25-apps, to fix its pending l10n
issues (and, if needed, very minor QA issues).
Could you consider hinting it to enter testing?
The NMU changelog is:
Source: ax25-apps
Version: 0.0.6-14.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer:
31 matches
Mail list logo
