Dear release people,
I think you know best how to contact buildd admins.
Reversing the order of what
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=dfsbuildver=1.0.0arch=amd64stamp=1176485127file=log
This one was probably attempted after the first one? No wonder.
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 08:56:28AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Dear release people,
I think you know best how to contact buildd admins.
Reversing the order of what
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I have prepared a fix for the bug 418284 for etch. I think this fix
should be included since:
- - initial installations over pppoe might hit this bug
- - the fix is non-intusive and that trivial that would be a shame not
to have it
I have
Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 13 April 2007 14:18, Frans Pop wrote:
I could not check if those packages may be blocked from migrating for
other reasons because p.qa.d.o is currently unreachable.
Correction: it was a problem on my side; AFAICT all packages should be OK
to migrate.
All
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 09:06:17AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Basically it looks ok. What about the freeze period for the toolchain? I
think we usually suffer for a too early freeze of the glibc (it has been
frozen in July for Etch, even if it
[debian-release is not a discussion list; cc:ing to debian-project, please
respect M-F-T (if mutt doesn't eat my setting again).]
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 05:22:46AM -0700, Seth Lang wrote:
By definition I thought release-critical to mean that
it was critical for these bugs to be fixed before
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 11:06:19AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt enquired:
The release team is currently working on a schedule for the lenny
release cycle. For that, we want to gather some data from the bigger
software packaging teams in Debian first.
We would like
At 1176460173 time_t, Christoph Berg wrote:
I would like to upload the mutt version now in unstable (1.5.13-3) to
etch. The only change [*] is a fix pulled from upstream that resolves
a bug that prevents mutt from successfully re-logging into an imap
connection that has timed out (e.g. while
Hi
Can someone please schedule binNMUs for the libpq4 to libpq5 transition once
libpq5 (postgresql-8.2) is built everywhere?
Cheers
Luk
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
At 1176554433 time_t, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
I have prepared a fix for the bug 418284 for etch. I think this fix
should be included since:
- initial installations over pppoe might hit this bug
- the fix is non-intusive and that trivial that would be a shame not
to have it
So small, ok from my
On 2007-04-14 Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone please schedule binNMUs for the libpq4 to libpq5 transition once
libpq5 (postgresql-8.2) is built everywhere?
Hello,
wouldn't it be better to wait until libpq5 is in testing? Otherwise a
(newly found) rc-bug in libpq5's source would
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 05:06:18PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2007-04-14 Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone please schedule binNMUs for the libpq4 to libpq5 transition once
libpq5 (postgresql-8.2) is built everywhere?
Hello,
wouldn't it be better to wait until libpq5 is
With the upload of ocamlnet 2.2.7 to unstable all ocaml libraries
depending on it are now broken, I kindly ask the following binNMUs to
fix that:
cduce_0.4.1-1, rebuild against newer ocamlnet, 1, alpha amd64 hppa i386 ia64
m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc
libhttp-ocaml-dev_0.1.3-2,
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
With the upload of ocamlnet 2.2.7 to unstable all ocaml libraries
depending on it are now broken, I kindly ask the following binNMUs to
fix that:
cduce_0.4.1-1, rebuild against newer ocamlnet, 1, alpha amd64 hppa i386
ia64 m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc
Hi
Can someone please schedule binNMUs for the following packages:
ndtpd_3.1.5-6.3, rebuild against libeb12, 1, alpha amd64 arm hppa hurd-i386
i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc
libeb-ruby_2.3-1, rebuild against libeb12, 1, alpha amd64 arm hppa hurd-i386
i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 08:51:52AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt didn't write:
The currently known upstream plans are the following:
- Firefox 3.0 is expected around Q2 2007.
- Xulrunner 1.9 should be expected at the same time.
- Seamonkey 1.5 should be expected some time
Hi
Can someone please give back rtorrent_0.7.1-1 on alpha, mips, powerpc and
sparc as libtorrent-dev = 0.11.1 was not yet available on these architectures
when a first build was tried?
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hi
Can someone schedule binNMUs for:
nut_2.0.5-3, Rebuild against fixed libgd2 (shlibs was wrong), 1, alpha mips
Current installed packages on alpha and mips are uninstallable...
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Regarding #418637.
I've prepared a new release of deb-gview which Build-Depends on
libarchive-dev. libarchive1 has been replaced by libarchive2 in
unstable but I cannot find any ABI/API change as yet - I use deb-gview
and reprepro regularly (I suspect others would use the two together as
well)
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 08:56:28AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Now that the debhelper change has been reverted, we can't rebuild
texlive with fixed tex-common. We need to upload a reverted tex-common,
and then rebuild texlive. Until this has happened,
Hi
Can someone please give back libglade-java_2.12.4-1+b1 on alpha and powerpc?
The missing build dependency libgnome-jni (= 2.12.3-1) is now available on
alpha and powerpc.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
21 matches
Mail list logo
