Re: debian-installer plans for the lenny cycle

2007-04-19 Thread Luis Matos
I am only going to make this question as interested user. Since live-cd is happening, they are doing a great job, i think it would be interesting to have d-i used to install the system from the live-cd. I know it is possible, but how it is possible, i don't relly know. Qua, 2007-04-18 às 22:18

Re: debian-installer plans for the lenny cycle

2007-04-19 Thread Daniel Baumann
Luis Matos wrote: Since live-cd is happening, they are doing a great job, i think it would be interesting to have d-i used to install the system from the live-cd. I know it is possible, but how it is possible, i don't relly know. http://lists.debian.org/debian-desktop/2007/04/msg00018.html

Re: debian-installer plans for the lenny cycle

2007-04-19 Thread Frans Pop
On Thursday 19 April 2007 13:26, Luis Matos wrote: Since live-cd is happening, they are doing a great job, i think it would be interesting to have d-i used to install the system from the live-cd. I know it is possible, but how it is possible, i don't relly know. As Ubuntu is already doing

Re: transition: libcurl3 - libcurl4

2007-04-19 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 03:01:11PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote: On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 04:43:13AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 03:38:16PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote: yes, we also have a libcurl transition. should i now throw it in the wild wild unstable

problem with mips

2007-04-19 Thread Torsten Werner
Hi, erlang has been autobuilt on mips: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=erlang;ver=1%3A11.b.4-2;arch=mips;stamp=1176246046 but the package has never reached the mirrors. What is wrong? Can it be given back to the autobuilder? Cheers, Torsten -- blog: http://twerner.blogspot.com/

Re: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Xfce plans for the lenny cycle

2007-04-19 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 17 avril 2007 à 06:11 +0200, Steve Langasek a écrit : Timeline gaming and other selfish behaviors on the part of individual maintainers are a huge reason why Debian has a history of missing its release targets by such a wide margin[0]. If you care about timely releases and minimizing

Re: Gnome plans for the lenny cycle

2007-04-19 Thread Loïc Minier
Hi, (sorry for not getting back to this earlier) On Thu, Apr 12, 2007, Gustavo Franco wrote: On 4/12/07, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We would like to know which major upstream versions of Gnome are expected to be released in the next 24 months and how much time

Re: Gnome plans for the lenny cycle

2007-04-19 Thread Loïc Minier
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007, Gustavo Franco wrote: I would like to suggest a online meeting with the groups admins and a debate channel running in parallel with the public and others group contributors. While I don't think this is necessary for this particular point, I think we should have release

Re: Gnome plans for the lenny cycle

2007-04-19 Thread Andreas Barth
* Loïc Minier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070419 22:36]: While I don't think this is necessary for this particular point, I think we should have release progress IRC meetings; some kind of release team talks with the various teams meeting: - status reports (difficulties, progress) - room for

Re: problem with mips

2007-04-19 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 06:49:24PM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote: erlang has been autobuilt on mips: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=erlang;ver=1%3A11.b.4-2;arch=mips;stamp=1176246046 but the package has never reached the mirrors. What is wrong? Glibc has been eating the mips buildds due

[etch r1] glibc 2.3.6.ds1-13etch1

2007-04-19 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Hi all, We would like to make an upload of the glibc package to etch to fix a few issues that we find important enough to get them fixed. Please find below the current changelog of our etch branch. Is it ok to upload it? Bye, Aurelien glibc (2.3.6.ds1-13etch1) stable; urgency=low [ Pierre

Re: [etch r1] glibc 2.3.6.ds1-13etch1

2007-04-19 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 12:29:12AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: We would like to make an upload of the glibc package to etch to fix a few issues that we find important enough to get them fixed. Please find below the current changelog of our etch branch. Is it ok to upload it? *