Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2007-06-17 19:48:10, schrieb Pierre Habouzit:
Then you have to stay with sarge. too bad.
I think, you do not understand the problem IF someone is using the Stock
Debian Kernel she/he can not upgrade to Etchm since ALL Etch-Kernels
have SMP compiled in.
It
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 11:21:36PM +0200, Thomas Weber wrote:
Am Samstag, den 30.06.2007, 15:49 -0700 schrieb Steve Langasek:
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 05:51:32PM -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
Looking at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we have more than one alternative package (bash _and_ mksh - and maybe
pdksh, ATT ksh, zsh? No idea if they're /bin/sh compatible enough), we
need the configuration mechanism in all shells that can be used as /bin/sh
so that we have a choose-one-out-of-many kind of
G77 to Gfortran Transition
We would like to present the G77 to gfortran transition as a Lenny
release goal. The Debian developers responsible for the transition
are Riku Voipio [EMAIL PROTECTED] (fortran application and library
packages) and Mathias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] (toolchain packages).
Hi,
new (incompatible) upstream versions of libnxml and libmrss with
versioned shlibs have been uploaded. A rebuild of newsbeuter is
required because of that.
Thanks,
Torsten
--
blog: http://twerner.blogspot.com/
homepage: http://www.twerner42.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 09:12:30AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Ubuntu switched /bin/sh to dash several releases ago. I am not sure
why, but suspect it was to speed up the boot.
Your suspicion is entirely correct.
(We have taken a certain amount of flak from third parties who had
written
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:46:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Please recheck with the recent gcc-snapshot 20070613 upload. We may
miss another backport from the trunk.
Did someone check already ?
Side note: gcc-snapshot currently cannot be built due to the too
strict
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 08:55:53PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:46:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Please recheck with the recent gcc-snapshot 20070613 upload. We may
miss another backport from the trunk.
Did someone check already ?
Probably
On Tuesday 05 June 2007 00:08, Frans Pop wrote:
After those have been built, I can upload D-I itself.
D-I has been uploaded yesterday. Current status is:
- uploaded/installed: i386, ia64, mipsel, sparc
- failed alpha, arm, hppa, powerpc, s390
- need build: m68k (likely to fail), mips (likely to
Hi,
I see that apparently dhcp3 is still frozen for some reason and requiring
you guys to let it into testing. Can you do that? How come it's still
frozen? Is it because it makes a udeb?
regards
Andrew
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 7/5/07, Andrew Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I see that apparently dhcp3 is still frozen for some reason and requiring
you guys to let it into testing. Can you do that? How come it's still
frozen? Is it because it makes a udeb?
Hi Andrew,
Yes, right now the package is blocked just
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 06:32:39AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
I see that apparently dhcp3 is still frozen for some reason and requiring
you guys to let it into testing. Can you do that? How come it's still
frozen? Is it because it makes a udeb?
Yep, unblocked.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
Hi,
apache2-mpm-itk needs to be binNMUed for every apache2 upload. Apache2
2.2.4-1 seems to be built on all archs, so please binNMU
apache2-mpm-itk.
Thanks.
Stefan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
13 matches
Mail list logo
