Re: hdf5 ldbl128 transition -- binNMU request

2007-09-17 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 04:37:37PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > About #430260 and merged: > The long double type is not used in the HDF5 API (even if used in a few > defines for completeness) so library renaming is superfluous. At the > same time, mpich transitioned for the same reason,

Re: binNMUs for glib2.0 2.14.1-2

2007-09-17 Thread Sebastian Dröge
Am Montag, den 17.09.2007, 20:47 -0700 schrieb Steve Langasek: > Hi Sebastian, > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 11:42:30PM +0200, Sebastian Dröge wrote: > > Hi, > > please schedule binNMUs for glib2.0 2.14.1-2 on all archs against pcre3 > > 7.3-2 (libpcre3-dev). > > The binNMU is needed because of bro

Re: binNMUs for glib2.0 2.14.1-2

2007-09-17 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Sebastian, On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 11:42:30PM +0200, Sebastian Dröge wrote: > Hi, > please schedule binNMUs for glib2.0 2.14.1-2 on all archs against pcre3 > 7.3-2 (libpcre3-dev). > The binNMU is needed because of broken shlibs (required to low version) > in the previous pcre version and glib u

Re: [stable] kernel upload to p-u

2007-09-17 Thread dann frazier
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 02:21:27PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Both #317258 and #410817 are showing activity now, but its difficult > > to predict when they will be resolved. In the meantime, I'm going to > > upload our current set of changes to p

binNMUs for glib2.0 2.14.1-2

2007-09-17 Thread Sebastian Dröge
Hi, please schedule binNMUs for glib2.0 2.14.1-2 on all archs against pcre3 7.3-2 (libpcre3-dev). The binNMU is needed because of broken shlibs (required to low version) in the previous pcre version and glib uses newer symbols than available in the old shlibs version. Thanks signature.asc Descri

Re: [stable] kernel upload to p-u

2007-09-17 Thread Otavio Salvador
dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Both #317258 and #410817 are showing activity now, but its difficult > to predict when they will be resolved. In the meantime, I'm going to > upload our current set of changes to proposed-updates so we can > increase the testing pool. If these issues get

Re: Bug#317258: [stable] kernel upload to p-u

2007-09-17 Thread dann frazier
[This is becoming off-topic for debian-release, and is redundant for debian-kernel (which already receives bug traffic), so removing both from To:] On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 09:50:13AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 07:03:32PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > > I've modified the

Re: [stable] kernel upload to p-u

2007-09-17 Thread dann frazier
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 11:20:35AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > dann frazier wrote: >> hey, >> I think we're nearly ready for a kernel upload to proposed-updates. >> Here's the current list of changes queued for a stable upload. > > Can you please consider fixing #317258 again? It's only about PCI ID

Re: [stable] kernel upload to p-u

2007-09-17 Thread dann frazier
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 03:42:50PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote: > Hello, > > I think we should add patches to update the forcedeth and e1000 drivers > to the latest version, too. Those are many changes, but also many new > boxes require those new drivers: obviously most nvidia based athlon > a

hdf5 ldbl128 transition -- binNMU request

2007-09-17 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
Hi RMs About #430260 and merged: The long double type is not used in the HDF5 API (even if used in a few defines for completeness) so library renaming is superfluous. At the same time, mpich transitioned for the same reason, so I'm asking for a binNMU in order to fix things: we have not currentl

Re: [SRM] Removal of iceweasel-l10n-roa-es-val

2007-09-17 Thread Jordi Mallach
On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 06:03:01PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: > > Sorry I don't see a good reason to remove this package. > > Maybe it's useless, but what else? > As said, it's existence is a problem. Jordi and Robert can explain it > best if you need further information. The problem is Debian d