Re: neon transition for Lenny

2007-10-15 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote: As Neon 0.27.2 was accepted to the archives, I would like to urge everyone to use this version instead of the now unsupported 0.25.x and 0.26.y versions. The biggest targets are OpenOffice.org, which has a RFH (#419523 [1]) {...} Please ask your upstream if Neon

Re: binNMU request for gtkmathview on amd64 [Was: Re: Bug#441198: Crash on amd64]

2007-10-15 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 10:24:14AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: Hi -releasers, can you please schedule a binNMU for the source package gtkmathview on amd64? Unfortunately I'm not entirely sure that it is the proper solution, since I did not (also after talking with upstream et al) about

Re: binNMU request for gtkmathview on amd64

2007-10-15 Thread Russ Allbery
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Well, I tried to do a local rebuild on amd64 to understand the nature of this bug, and it failed with this error: g++ -g -Wall -O2 -W -Wall -o test_embedding test_embedding.o dummy.o -lstdc++ ../src/widget/.libs/libgtkmathview_libxml2.a

Re: py-asterisk REMOVED from testing

2007-10-15 Thread Julien BLACHE
Debian testing watch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Could someone explain why py-asterisk and libasterisk-agi-perl got pulled from testing due to security concerns in *asterisk* itself ? Previous version: 0.1a3+r160-3 Current version: (not in testing) Hint:

Re: py-asterisk REMOVED from testing

2007-10-15 Thread Luk Claes
Julien BLACHE wrote: Debian testing watch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Hi Could someone explain why py-asterisk and libasterisk-agi-perl got pulled from testing due to security concerns in *asterisk* itself ? Because asterisk maintainers apparantly aren't interesting in making sure

Re: py-asterisk REMOVED from testing

2007-10-15 Thread Julien BLACHE
Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Could someone explain why py-asterisk and libasterisk-agi-perl got pulled from testing due to security concerns in *asterisk* itself ? Because asterisk maintainers apparantly aren't interesting in making sure stable and secure packages reach testing

Re: py-asterisk REMOVED from testing

2007-10-15 Thread Faidon Liambotis
Luk Claes wrote: Because asterisk maintainers apparantly aren't interesting in making sure stable and secure packages reach testing as this is already taking months and even before the release these packages were more than once in a very bad shape, I thought they wouldn't mind... I guess I

Re: [Secure-testing-team] py-asterisk REMOVED from testing

2007-10-15 Thread Luk Claes
Faidon Liambotis wrote: Luk Claes wrote: Because asterisk maintainers apparantly aren't interesting in making sure stable and secure packages reach testing as this is already taking months and even before the release these packages were more than once in a very bad shape, I thought they

Re: binNMU request for gtkmathview on amd64 [Was: Re: Bug#441198: Crash on amd64]

2007-10-15 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 12:11:40AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 10:24:14AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: Hi -releasers, can you please schedule a binNMU for the source package gtkmathview on amd64? Unfortunately I'm not entirely sure that it is the proper

Re: py-asterisk REMOVED from testing

2007-10-15 Thread Faidon Liambotis
Luk Claes wrote: Unfortunately, asterisk in lenny was FTBFSing because of missing or changed dependencies so I couldn't make an upload to testing-security, even though the version is exactly the same as of etch. It was FTBFSing because of a removed build dependency which apparantly was

Re: Bin-NMUs for radiusd-livingston, libtabe; db4.5

2007-10-15 Thread Bastian Blank
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 03:11:20PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: Would you please schedule bin-NMUs for radiusd-livingston and libtabe on all architectures? (There might be more packages affected on other architectures, but I can't easily search for them.) You should provide a list of all

dont tell anybody about this site

2007-10-15 Thread Sara
Secret place with x x x passes www offer32 cn cackles glareole fore beagles civilizations sclerosarcoma thievishness dog treator Shields efflorescency Guatemalan hyperabsorption Austin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Re: neon transition for Lenny

2007-10-15 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Laszlo Boszormenyi] The biggest targets are OpenOffice.org, which has a RFH (#419523 [1]) filed as Rene is its only real maintainer and Subversion. Subversion upstream recently added neon 0.27 support, a trivial patch which I can backport to our packages any time. I'll do (and test) it soon.

Re: [Pkg-db-devel] Bin-NMUs for radiusd-livingston, libtabe; db4.5

2007-10-15 Thread Florian Weimer
* Bastian Blank: On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 03:11:20PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: Would you please schedule bin-NMUs for radiusd-livingston and libtabe on all architectures? (There might be more packages affected on other architectures, but I can't easily search for them.) You should

my private collection

2007-10-15 Thread Pete Lyons
my p o r n archive. no fee www 32action cn constructors borderer stiffly salsify award yappiness cinefilm mashes upflinging ambassadors triplite Shiites resider Edmond -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]