long term solution for flashplugin-nonfree in stable

2007-12-20 Thread Bart Martens
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 23:34 +0100, Luk Claes wrote: Scott Kitterman wrote: On Wednesday 19 December 2007 12:06, Holger Levsen wrote: Hi, I would like to know what the stable release managers plan to do regarding flashplugin-nonfree in etch. As I see it, there are three options:

keep yaird out of testing

2007-12-20 Thread maximilian attems
#457177 summarizes the known grumblings of yaird failures. current state is no fun and thus i may ask to keep it away from testing users. d-kernel will keep yaird install possibility for 2.6.24 even if it highly likely don't grok it, but we are considering to remove it beyond that release.

swfdec-mozilla need a build on mips and mipsel to get to testing

2007-12-20 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
Hi! I was looking at the status of the swfdec stuff (swfdec0.5, swfdec-mozilla, swfdec-gnome) before uploading the new version, and It seems [1] that we are just missing the builds for swfdec-mozilla on mips and mipsel so that we can transition. If somebody could please trigger those builds

Is Flash 9.0.31 secure enough?

2007-12-20 Thread Philippe Cloutier
Hi Bart, should someone who already has Flash 9.0.31 installed from stable's flashplugin-nonfree uninstall it due to security issues? I only see one important security bug, CVE-2007-5275. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Re: Is Flash 9.0.31 secure enough?

2007-12-20 Thread Nico Golde
Hi Philippe, * Philippe Cloutier [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-20 14:34]: should someone who already has Flash 9.0.31 installed from stable's flashplugin-nonfree uninstall it due to security issues? I only see one important security bug, CVE-2007-5275. This is the wrong mailing list, I think

Re: Is Flash 9.0.31 secure enough?

2007-12-20 Thread Philippe Cloutier
Le December 20, 2007 09:42:04 am Bart Martens, vous avez écrit : On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 08:36 -0500, Philippe Cloutier wrote: Hi Bart, should someone who already has Flash 9.0.31 installed from stable's flashplugin-nonfree uninstall it due to security issues? Yes. I only see one

Re: Is Flash 9.0.31 secure enough?

2007-12-20 Thread Philippe Cloutier
Le December 20, 2007 09:30:43 am Nico Golde, vous avez écrit : Hi Philippe, * Philippe Cloutier [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-20 14:34]: should someone who already has Flash 9.0.31 installed from stable's flashplugin-nonfree uninstall it due to security issues? I only see one important

Re: long term solution for flashplugin-nonfree in stable

2007-12-20 Thread Philippe Cloutier
Le December 20, 2007 06:02:26 am Bart Martens, vous avez écrit : On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 23:34 +0100, Luk Claes wrote: Scott Kitterman wrote: On Wednesday 19 December 2007 12:06, Holger Levsen wrote: Hi, I would like to know what the stable release managers plan to do regarding

Re: please bin-NMU openoffice.org-voikko

2007-12-20 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 11:56:05PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: please requeue bin-NMUs of openoffice.org-voikko on all archs to rebuild it against OOo 2.3.1. Scheduled. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer