Re: Packages broken because of libdjvulibre21 and libdjvulibre15

2008-03-20 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 12:01:05PM +, David wrote: Today's upgrades in sid broke my packages. djvulibre-bin was upgraded from 3.5.20-4 to 3.5.20-5. apt tried to install libdjvulibre21 as a dependency. libdjvulibre21 has common files with libdjvulibre15 (although no conflict is stated in

broken buildd (was: Suitesparse transition)

2008-03-20 Thread Torsten Werner
Hi, please see http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=shogunarch=armver=0.5.1-1stamp=1205965767file=logas=raw: lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 29 May 23 2007 /etc/alternatives/octave-config - /usr/bin/octave-config-2.1.71 That is fully broken. Who can be contacted about the problem? Cheers, Torsten

Re: broken buildd (was: Suitesparse transition)

2008-03-20 Thread Thomas Weber
On 20/03/08 09:19 +0100, Torsten Werner wrote: Hi, please see http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=shogunarch=armver=0.5.1-1stamp=1205965767file=logas=raw: lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 29 May 23 2007 /etc/alternatives/octave-config - /usr/bin/octave-config-2.1.71 That is fully broken.

imms

2008-03-20 Thread Artur R. Czechowski
Hello, Looking into imms PTS page[1] I noticed a note: Not touching package, as requested by luk (contact debian-release if update is needed) Currently there is one RC bug[2], so, accordingly to my best knowledge, imms won't migrate to testing unless bug is fixed. This bug is fixed in the latest

Re: sparc builds and issues with lebrun?

2008-03-20 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 02:39:24PM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: While wading through the testing transitions of pkg-games packages I noticed some packages in general cathegory Building with actual status Maybe-Failed I did porter NMUs for them in the meantime, but the rest of the mail still

Re: sparc builds and issues with lebrun?

2008-03-20 Thread Luk Claes
Gerfried Fuchs wrote: On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 02:39:24PM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: But, taking a closer look, all of those are having issues on the same sparc buildd host: lebrun. Taking a closer look the thing seems to be worse than thought: 151 packages in Maybe-Failed status with

Re: imms

2008-03-20 Thread Luk Claes
Artur R. Czechowski wrote: Hello, Hi Looking into imms PTS page[1] I noticed a note: Not touching package, as requested by luk (contact debian-release if update is needed) Currently there is one RC bug[2], so, accordingly to my best knowledge, imms won't migrate to testing unless bug is

Re: imms

2008-03-20 Thread Artur R. Czechowski
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 07:44:14PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: This bug is fixed in the latest upload of imms which is waiting for ftp-master approval[3]. Due to all above please consider unlocking migration of the imms package to testing. I removed the block hint, though the package will

Re: Give back petsc [was: Re: Suitesparse transition]

2008-03-20 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 22:52 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 20:29 +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: Adam Powell uploaded version 2.3.3-7 of petsc that build-depends alternatively on liopenmpi-dev or lam4-dev. This should fix the Dep-Wait status on some arches, like arm,

Re: Give back petsc [was: Re: Suitesparse transition]

2008-03-20 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Adam C Powell IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-20 16:06]: I uploaded new spooles and petsc this morning. Spooles has built successfully on arm. petsc was tried on hppa, but failed because of missing lam. lam has not failed on hppa, but 7.1.2-1.3 has not been attempted; same with armel.