On Saturday 22 March 2008 09:35:35 Luk Claes wrote:
If you're sure the internal compiler error has been fixed, then a
rebuild is in order...
FYI, I can reproduce the ICE on my NSLU2 while compiling the same file.
Joost
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 10:02:22PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
Matthias Klose writes:
For all ports besides alpha and hppa we plan to make GCC-4.3 the
default compilers for lenny.
amd64 and i386 side note: the gcc-4.3 4.3.0-2 upload has a patch
reenabling the cld instruction when
Hi!
I was waiting for the Lenny beta1 version of the debian-installer to be
out to make this official: I hereby resign from my position of d-i
Release Manager.
I was relunctant at first and time told us that I wasn't really tied for
that job.
Don't worry, I am still going to work on d-i
Joost Yervante Damad wrote:
On Sunday 23 March 2008 07:33:18 Joost Yervante Damad wrote:
On Saturday 22 March 2008 09:35:35 Luk Claes wrote:
If you're sure the internal compiler error has been fixed, then a
rebuild is in order...
FYI, I can reproduce the ICE on my NSLU2 while compiling the
On Sunday 23 March 2008 07:33:18 Joost Yervante Damad wrote:
On Saturday 22 March 2008 09:35:35 Luk Claes wrote:
If you're sure the internal compiler error has been fixed, then a
rebuild is in order...
FYI, I can reproduce the ICE on my NSLU2 while compiling the same file.
Some more info:
* Joost Yervante Damad [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-23 09:30]:
On Saturday 22 March 2008 09:35:35 Luk Claes wrote:
If you're sure the internal compiler error has been fixed, then a
rebuild is in order...
FYI, I can reproduce the ICE on my NSLU2 while compiling the same file.
Some more
André,
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 01:14:59PM +0100, André Wendt wrote:
I just noticed glibc 2.7-9 is not in testing. There's a circular
dependency with hurd [1] and a dependency on kfreebsd-kernel-headers,
which should be something like kfreebsd-headers-*.
Is glibc 2.7-9 going to be hinted
* Adam C Powell IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-20 16:06]:
I uploaded new spooles and petsc this morning. Spooles has built
successfully on arm. petsc was tried on hppa, but failed because of
missing lam. lam has not failed on hppa, but 7.1.2-1.3 has not been
attempted; same with armel.
André Wendt a écrit :
Hi,
I just noticed glibc 2.7-9 is not in testing. There's a circular
dependency with hurd [1] and a dependency on kfreebsd-kernel-headers,
which should be something like kfreebsd-headers-*.
Is glibc 2.7-9 going to be hinted into testing anytime soon?
No, glibc has
Jérémy Bobbio [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi!
I was waiting for the Lenny beta1 version of the debian-installer to be
out to make this official: I hereby resign from my position of d-i
Release Manager.
I was relunctant at first and time told us that I wasn't really tied for
that job.
* Pierre Habouzit:
Isn't it risky for partial upgrades from etch ? Shouldn't we wait for
lenny+1 to revert this ?
I second that, please don't revert the patch until lenny+1. FWIW I
believe the release team as a whole wanted the patch to be kept as well,
but I'll let the other members
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 07:23:10PM +, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Pierre Habouzit:
Isn't it risky for partial upgrades from etch ? Shouldn't we wait for
lenny+1 to revert this ?
I second that, please don't revert the patch until lenny+1. FWIW I
believe the release team as a whole
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 08:23:10PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
What about fixing the etch kernel?
The kernel will get fixed.
Bastian
--
Each kiss is as the first.
-- Miramanee, Kirk's wife, The Paradise Syndrome,
stardate 4842.6
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 04:54:29PM +, Matthias Klose wrote:
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 07:15:11AM +, Mike Hommey wrote:
Isn't it risky for partial upgrades from etch ? Shouldn't we wait for
lenny+1 to revert this ?
I second that, please don't revert the patch until lenny+1.
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 07:35:56PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
André Wendt a écrit :
I just noticed glibc 2.7-9 is not in testing. There's a circular
dependency with hurd [1] and a dependency on kfreebsd-kernel-headers,
which should be something like kfreebsd-headers-*.
Is glibc 2.7-9
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 07:41:59PM +, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 04:54:29PM +, Matthias Klose wrote:
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 07:15:11AM +, Mike Hommey wrote:
Isn't it risky for partial upgrades from etch ? Shouldn't we wait for
lenny+1 to revert this ?
THe _BEST_ example of that are buildd's that for now run etch (even
some sarge not so long time ago) and have a sid chroot to build. Not
keeping the CLD patch means that we break our own buildd infrastructure.
Yay.
No, this is not an argument. If a buildd is used to build packages for
more
IMO the current opinions Isn't it risky, I second that only look
for the risk of running an unfixed kernel (if at all), not of shipping
a compiler diverting in code generation from upstream.
I'm sure all of this is because of the CLD patch:
1,5M gcc-4.2-4.2.3/debian/patches
there's no
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Torsten Werner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the shogun developer (Sören) is still on vacation but I will contact him
ASAP.
Shogun has now been built on all important architectures except hppa
where the buildd is very slow. I do not know what we can do here.
This will last up to the lenny release, and the toolchain is to be
freezed next week. So I don't ...
... think you'll have to support that patch actively for too long.
wrong, once released with the patch you'll get bug reports for the
compiler with the patch applied. For every report
The status os lua-svn on arm is building, and has not changes in the
last 3 days...
Could you plase unblock it?
Cheers
--
Enrico Tassi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Matthias Klose ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080323 21:39]:
This will last up to the lenny release, and the toolchain is to be
freezed next week. So I don't ...
... think you'll have to support that patch actively for too long.
wrong, once released with the patch you'll get bug reports for
Rafael Laboissiere [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Adam C Powell IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-20 16:06]:
I uploaded new spooles and petsc this morning. Spooles has built
successfully on arm. petsc was tried on hppa, but failed because of
missing lam. lam has not failed on hppa, but 7.1.2-1.3
Steve Langasek a écrit :
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 07:35:56PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
André Wendt a écrit :
I just noticed glibc 2.7-9 is not in testing. There's a circular
dependency with hurd [1] and a dependency on kfreebsd-kernel-headers,
which should be something like
24 matches
Mail list logo
