On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 09:10:37AM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:29:27PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
Is there any particular reason for this package name change without
backwards-compatibility?
Yes, there are only a few dependencies.
Please remove swfdec0.5 from the archives, currently on testing, unstable
and experimental, it has been superseded by swfdec0.6, 0.5 version has
security problems and is no longer maintained as it was the old development
branch. All packages depending on version 0.5 have been compiled against 0.6
On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 12:06:03PM +0200, Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote:
Please remove swfdec0.5 from the archives, currently on testing, unstable
and experimental, it has been superseded by swfdec0.6, 0.5 version has
security problems and is no longer maintained as it was the old development
Otavio, please consider approving xfsprogs 2.9.8-1
Release team, please consider unblocking it.
Changes:
xfsprogs (2.9.8-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release
* xfsprogs and xfsprogs-udeb depend on ${misc:Depends}
* Add Homepage control header
* Add watch file
* Fix
any reason to not unblock libpng?
Cheers,
Andi
- Forwarded message from Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: unblock bump libpng
Date: Sun, 4 May 2008 14:21:09 +0200
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: netcat 1.10
On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 10:44:33PM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote:
[snip]
The packages in question did migrate already...
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp Kern Debian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de Debian Release Assistant
`. `'
On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 10:33:01AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
IIRC the geda packages require a hint to get into testing because
there's a library and a set of binary packages which must all go
together. All of the packages are now in sync in unstable and well past
the 10-day mark.
Hinted,
Hi,
http://bugs.debian.org/477751
This issue has been reported as a serious bug. Unfortunately solving it
will very probably mean to rethink/rewrite the system. So I would like
to request to tag the bug with lenny-ignore and solve it after the
lenny release.
Thanks and regards, Daniel
--
To
Hi,
please schedule binNMUs for obconf with a dep-wait on
openbox-dev 3.4.7.2-1. openbox-dev and thus libobparser and
libobrender and an ABI change and obconf needs to be rebuild
against the new version in order to be installable.
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Otavio, please consider approving xfsprogs 2.9.8-1
Release team, please consider unblocking it.
No objection
- --
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
Hello,
Otavio, please consider approving acl 2.2.47-2
Release team, please consider unblocking it.
Thank you!
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
--
Red Rosa now has vanished too Bertolt Brecht
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
Otavio, please consider approving acl 2.2.47-2
acl is not up to me to approve. It's blocked because libacl1 is
required. It's up to RM team to approve it or not.
- --
O T A V I O
On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 09:52:04PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
acl is not up to me to approve. It's blocked because libacl1 is
required. It's up to RM team to approve it or not.
Release team, please consider approving acl 2.2.47-2
Thank you,
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
--
Red Rosa now has
ltsp is again blocked from migrating into testing, likely due to the
ltsp-client-builder udeb, though this udeb is not used by
debian-installer by default.
it has been in unstable for 8 days now, without introducing new
problems.
thanks for your consideration and work.
live well,
vagrant
--
14 matches
Mail list logo
