Please unblock libusb/2:0.1.12-11 and usbutils/0.73-8

2008-05-21 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Hi, Please unblock libusb/2:0.1.12-11 and usbutils/0.73-8, which are both blocked because of their udeb. They have no known regression. Changelogs: libusb (2:0.1.12-11) unstable; urgency=low . * Add a build-depends on docbook (closes: bug#479572). usbutils (0.73-8) unstable; urgency=low

[SRM] Bug at conversion scripts of sourceforge to trac (trac)

2008-05-21 Thread Otavio Salvador
Hello, I'd like to fix #444052 in etch and it's basically no risk since it's a patch to a contrib script used for migration only. Can I upload it? Patch is attached at bug. -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Please unblock libusb/2:0.1.12-11 and usbutils/0.73-8

2008-05-21 Thread Otavio Salvador
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, Please unblock libusb/2:0.1.12-11 and usbutils/0.73-8, which are both blocked because of their udeb. They have no known regression. Changelogs: libusb (2:0.1.12-11) unstable; urgency=low . *

Re: [SRM] Bug at conversion scripts of sourceforge to trac (trac)

2008-05-21 Thread Otavio Salvador
I've added the package diff for review. diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 19fe1b4..40aeafe 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +trac (0.10.3-1etch3) stable; urgency=low + + * Fix contrib/sourceforge2trac to work with Trac 0.10.3. Closes: +

Re: Bug #474632: josm: Should not enter testing

2008-05-21 Thread Torsten Werner
Hi, On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 6:58 PM, Giovanni Mascellani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: while an out-of-date josm wouldn't work for anyone. every Flickr client, the google data api, instant messager client that talk proprietory protocols and probably more packages have the same problem but we ship

Re: Bug #474632: josm: Should not enter testing

2008-05-21 Thread Giovanni Mascellani
Il giorno mer, 21/05/2008 alle 20.00 +0200, Torsten Werner ha scritto: Hi, On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 6:58 PM, Giovanni Mascellani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: while an out-of-date josm wouldn't work for anyone. every Flickr client, the google data api, instant messager client that talk

Re: Freeze exception for shadow

2008-05-21 Thread Nicolas François
Hello, Here is the patch I would like to get accepted: debian/patches/300_SHA_crypt_method | 36 + debian/patches/301_manpages_missing_options | 197 ++ shadow-4.1.1/debian/changelog

Re: Bug#474632: Bug #474632: josm: Should not enter testing

2008-05-21 Thread Andreas Putzo
Hi, On May 21 20:00, Torsten Werner wrote: On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 6:58 PM, Giovanni Mascellani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: while an out-of-date josm wouldn't work for anyone. every Flickr client, the google data api, instant messager client that talk proprietory protocols and probably more

Re: Freeze exception for shadow

2008-05-21 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Nicolas François] Compared to my previous mail, I added some comments in /etc/login.defs. Will the comments in /etc/login.defs trigger a conffile prompt from dpkg on installations where the local admin had edited login.defs before the upgrade? If so, I urge you to not make such change in a

Re: Freeze exception for shadow

2008-05-21 Thread Otavio Salvador
Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [Nicolas François] Compared to my previous mail, I added some comments in /etc/login.defs. Will the comments in /etc/login.defs trigger a conffile prompt from dpkg on installations where the local admin had edited login.defs before the upgrade?

Re: Freeze exception for shadow

2008-05-21 Thread Nicolas François
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 07:14:51PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [Nicolas François] Compared to my previous mail, I added some comments in /etc/login.defs. Will the comments in /etc/login.defs trigger a conffile prompt from dpkg on