Re: New release of uw-imap prepared and uploaded to experimental

Adeodato Simó wrote: Asterisk is fixed already. I have filed bug#492285 and am now compiling a fixed package that I will upload as an NMU (but with no delay). Great, thank you. If you could still file a bug against asterisk at important... (it now build-depends on libc-client2007b-dev). But p

Re: m68k-only source packages in etch and lenny

On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 02:03:31AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > It seems that source packages that only build m68k > > packages still ended up it etch and are currently > > in testing. > > > > Is that intended behaviour? > > No, that is not intended. > > > (The two exam

Re: Fwd: Please schedule binNMUs for openal -> openal-soft transition

* Andres Mejia [Sun, 13 Jul 2008 23:51:53 -0400]: > Hello, Hi, > I'm resending this email from Reinhard. We're requesting binNMUs for reverse > dependencies of openal. Our previous issue with uploading the latest version > of openal-soft has been resolved. Ok, I finally got to get this, I'm v

Re: Please allow libtorrent-rasterbar 0.13.1-2 propagate to lenny

Cristian Greco wrote: > Hi all, > > I noticed that libraries are already frozen, but I'd like to ask an exception > for libtorrent-rasterbar: could you allow revision 0.13.1-2 to reach testing > before freeze? It would be really important to have this version in stable > release, for the following

Re: m68k-only source packages in etch and lenny

Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > Hi. Hi > It seems that source packages that only build m68k > packages still ended up it etch and are currently > in testing. > > Is that intended behaviour? No, that is not intended. > (The two examples I saw were nvram and setsccserial, > I haven't compiled a compl

Please allow libtorrent-rasterbar 0.13.1-2 propagate to lenny

Hi all, I noticed that libraries are already frozen, but I'd like to ask an exception for libtorrent-rasterbar: could you allow revision 0.13.1-2 to reach testing before freeze? It would be really important to have this version in stable release, for the following reason. I was building new qbitt

Re: tasksel, meta-gnome2, cheese and now abiword

* Josselin Mouette [Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:37:15 +0200]: > > I've set cheese to need 8 days instead of 10; that should give a 2-day > > padding for cheese and meta-gnome2 to migrate (in 6 days) before taskel > > does (in 8). If you could check that in 6 or 7 days meta-gnome2 has > > migrated, that'd

Re: Upcoming librrd transition?

* Bernd Zeimetz [Thu, 17 Jul 2008 19:58:17 +0200]: > what't the current status here? > A transition before Lenny would be good as the new package fixes nasty > bugs like #450578 and hopefully - a pretty bad regression in the RRD > image rendering speed. Sigh, yet another mail that I managed to po

Re: New release of uw-imap prepared and uploaded to experimental

* Jonas Smedegaard [Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:11:04 +0200]: > Asterisk is fixed already. I have filed bug#492285 and am now compiling > a fixed package that I will upload as an NMU (but with no delay). Great, thank you. If you could still file a bug against asterisk at important... (it now build-dep

Re: New release of uw-imap prepared and uploaded to experimental

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 01:43:27AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: >On other news... > >> >binNMUs scheduled now. >> Thanks! > >If you could take care of filing bugs against asterisk and prayer so >that they build-depend on libc-client-dev instead of >li

m68k-only source packages in etch and lenny

Hi. It seems that source packages that only build m68k packages still ended up it etch and are currently in testing. Is that intended behaviour? (The two examples I saw were nvram and setsccserial, I haven't compiled a complete list) Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http:

release team (not package maintainer) wants yaird out of Lenny

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 package yaird retitle 457177 yaird: release team consider it generally too buggy thanks I still disagree with this bugreport. The software is *not* generally broken - it just behaves differently than that other ramdisk generator maintained by Max.

Re: Please unblock nano 2.0.7-3

* Jordi Mallach [Thu, 24 Jul 2008 21:07:34 +0200]: > Hi, Hi Jordi, > I'm requesting a freeze exception for nano 2.0.7-3, when current in > lenny is 2.0.7-1. Ok; nano is not frozen because of the freeze (yet), but just because it produces an udeb. Thanks for the detailed explanations, though :),

Please unblock nano 2.0.7-3

Hi, I'm requesting a freeze exception for nano 2.0.7-3, when current in lenny is 2.0.7-1. * -2 was uploaded on July 3rd to fix two important bugs that caused segfaults or freezes in nano. * -3 was uploaded with an extra patch to solve a FTBFS due to missing arguments to open() in a pair

Re: Bug#491601: madwifi-source fails to build against 2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-486

Oops, silly me, I just saw that you also linked to a new version of madwifi-tools, please ignore that part of my post. ;) Regards, Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bug#491601: madwifi-source fails to build against 2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-486

Hi Kel, Please test/consider the below backports for one of the upcoming stable updates. Michael if you could test them that would help alot, i've not able to test the driver, on etch, with supported hardware, have only been able to ensure it is compiling in etch with Linux 2.6.18 and 2.6

Re: unblocking e2fsprogs

On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:58:39AM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote: > On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 03:34:26PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 01:13:06AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: > > > > > > > In addition 1.41.0 closed a large number of bugs over 1.40.11, and is > > > > the first ve

Re: Selection of kernel for Lenny

Steve Langasek a écrit : > Hi Aurelien, Hi! > On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 06:19:01PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > >> - The switch to linux-libc-dev 2.6.25 is the reason why glibc currently >> FTBFS on hppa (due to a timeout in a test). Unfortunately I don't know >> yet which change causes the probl

Re: unblocking e2fsprogs

On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 06:02:37PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Thursday 24 July 2008, Theodore Tso wrote: > > I wouldn't dream of asking debian-boot to support ext4dev at this late > > date --- but there is one thing I would ask. As I recall, there was a > > temporary fix to force to use of 128 b

Re: unblocking e2fsprogs

On Thursday 24 July 2008, Theodore Tso wrote: > I wouldn't dream of asking debian-boot to support ext4dev at this late > date --- but there is one thing I would ask. As I recall, there was a > temporary fix to force to use of 128 byte inodes for the interim etch > release of the d-i. Could we mak

Re: [Pkg-octave-devel] Give back octave3.0 on sparc

* Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-23 23:03]: > On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:08:02 +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > > > Please, give back octave3.0/3.0.1-6 on sparc. The autobuild failed with a > > cryptic message [1]: > > > > g++ -c -fPIC -I. -I.. -I../liboctave -I../src -I../libcr

Re: unblocking e2fsprogs

On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 03:34:26PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 01:13:06AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: > > > > > In addition 1.41.0 closed a large number of bugs over 1.40.11, and is > > > the first version to have ext4 support. > > Btw, a version of GRUB 2 with ext4dev s

Re: Preparation of the next stable Debian GNU/Linux update

On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 01:09:14AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > We are preparing the next revision of the current stable Debian > distribution (sarge) and will frequently send reports so people can > actually comment on it and intervene whenever this is required. > I saw proftpd 1.3.0-19etch1 has

tasksel, meta-gnome2, cheese and now abiword

Le jeudi 24 juillet 2008 à 00:50 +0100, Adeodato Simó a écrit : > > Dear release team, could you please bump the urgency of cheese and > > meta-gnome2 to ensure they reach testing before tasksel ? > > I've set cheese to need 8 days instead of 10; that should give a 2-day > padding for cheese and m

Re: unblocking e2fsprogs

On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 01:13:06AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: > > > In addition 1.41.0 closed a large number of bugs over 1.40.11, and is > > the first version to have ext4 support. Btw, a version of GRUB 2 with ext4dev support was just uploaded (1.96+20080717-1). -- Robert Millan I know my

Re: please unblock xulrunner

On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 01:13:55PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote: > Hi Adeodato, > * Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-24 12:09]: > > * Nico Golde [Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:03:34 +0200]: > > > can someone please unblock xulrunner? > > > 1.9.0.1-1 fixes CVE-2008-2785[0] which is a fairly important >

Re: gtk 1 / gnome 1 lenny release goal

On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 12:05:47PM +, Jon Dowland wrote: > Hi folks, > > [ m-f-t fairly abritrarily debian-release ] > > I've read in a few places e.g. > that GTK 1.x and/or gnome > 1.x packages will be dropped from Lenny as part of a > release goal (that bug o

Re: please unblock xulrunner

Hi Adeodato, * Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-24 12:09]: > * Nico Golde [Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:03:34 +0200]: > > can someone please unblock xulrunner? > > 1.9.0.1-1 fixes CVE-2008-2785[0] which is a fairly important > > security issue that allows arbitrary code execution by > > overflow

Re: Mozilla in Lenny

Le mercredi 23 juillet 2008 à 23:39 +, Sam Morris a écrit : > There's also a bug unreported in Debian so far, but that affects epiphany > very badly. When a file is downloaded, instead of displaying the > 'download complete' notification, epiphany crashes. This doesn't happen > every time, b

Re: Please allow sysvinit version 2.86.ds1-60 into testing

Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > Please allow sysvinit version 2.86.ds1-60 to propagate into testing. > It fixes two issues I consider release critical. This is the Unblocked setting age-days to 15. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble

Re: l10n update for openssl

Christoph Martin wrote: > Hi Luk, > > Luk Claes schrieb: >> Christoph Martin wrote: >>> Hi release team, >> Hi Christoph >> >>> The l10n team asked for a new upload of openssl to include the pending >>> l10n updates. All the changes for this packages were checked in into >>> alioth. >>> >>> Woul

Re: Please unblock pango1.0 and glib2.0

Otavio Salvador wrote: > Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Josselin Mouette wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> please allow pango1.0 1.20.5-1 and glib2.0 2.16.4-2 migrate to testing. >>> Both have important bugfixes. >> Both need ack from debian-boot > > No objection unblocked Cheers Luk -- To

Re: force hint for chromium

Paul, am Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 04:04:21PM +0800 hast du folgendes geschrieben: > Would it be possible to get a force hint for chromium? It has been in > sid for 28 days, built everywhere and the obsolete chromium-data > source package has been removed. The RC bugs are fixed but britney > doesn't se

force hint for chromium

Hi RMs, [I'm subscribed, no need to CC] Would it be possible to get a force hint for chromium? It has been in sid for 28 days, built everywhere and the obsolete chromium-data source package has been removed. The RC bugs are fixed but britney doesn't seem to think they are for some reason. force