Re: Bug#475737: remove otrs2 from lenny?

2008-11-22 Thread Luk Claes
Thomas Viehmann wrote: Hi, given that there seems to be limited interest in fixing the #475737 (3 weeks since reopen without further comments), how about removing otrs2 from lenny? I'll have a look at fixing it. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Re: Even more security hinting

2008-11-22 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On 2008-11-20, Moritz Muehlenhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2008-11-18, Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Also, please give back apertium 3.0.7+1-2 on ia64, now that flex has been fixed. - wordpress/2.5.1-10 needs an unblock - Something's broken with

Re: Bug#475737: remove otrs2 from lenny?

2008-11-22 Thread Torsten Werner
Hi Thomas, On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Thomas Viehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: given that there seems to be limited interest in fixing the #475737 (3 weeks since reopen without further comments), how about removing otrs2 from lenny? I had sent the following reply to the list (but not to

gthumb/experimental needs rebuild

2008-11-22 Thread David Paleino
Hello, would you please schedule a rebuild of gthumb (the version in experimental)? It currently depends on libexiv2-2, while now the archive has libexiv2-4 and libexiv2-5 (thus, gthumb is not installable) Kindly, David -- . ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :'

Re: gthumb/experimental needs rebuild

2008-11-22 Thread Philipp Kern
Hallo David, am Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 12:11:47PM +0100 hast du folgendes geschrieben: would you please schedule a rebuild of gthumb (the version in experimental)? It currently depends on libexiv2-2, while now the archive has libexiv2-4 and libexiv2-5 (thus, gthumb is not installable) binNMUs

Re: security hints

2008-11-22 Thread Nico Golde
Hi, * Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-21 13:02]: please unblock the following packages to enter lenny, they fix security issues: - wordpress - movabletype-opensource - libxml2 ping? -- Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all

Please unblock ssmtp-2.26-2.2

2008-11-22 Thread Kari Pahula
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 11:32:50AM +0200, Kari Pahula wrote: Ouch, this is rather embarassing. I didn't get -2.1 quite right. ssmtp 2.26-2.2 fixes #506188, please allow it into testing. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Even more security hinting

2008-11-22 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Moritz Muehlenhoff [Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:32:44 +0100]: On 2008-11-18, Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Also, please give back apertium 3.0.7+1-2 on ia64, now that flex has been fixed. apertium is caught by pcre3 shlibs bump, so it's being handled via t-p-u.

aptitude version in t-p-u

2008-11-22 Thread Adeodato Simó
Hello Daniel, I saw your 0.4.11.11 upload of aptitude to t-p-u. Uploads to t-p-u should have a version number that is testing, but unstable, which your latest upload does not comply with. This happened as well the previous time, and I failed to mail you about it (we just realized when it had

Re: security hints

2008-11-22 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Nico Golde [Fri, 21 Nov 2008 03:04:20 +0100]: Hi, please unblock the following packages to enter lenny, they fix security issues: - wordpress - movabletype-opensource Unblocked. - libxml2 Already unblocked by Luk. -- Adeodato Simó dato at

Re: Even more security hinting

2008-11-22 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Moritz Muehlenhoff [Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:39:33 +0100]: On 2008-11-20, Moritz Muehlenhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2008-11-18, Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Also, please give back apertium 3.0.7+1-2 on ia64, now that flex has been fixed. -

Please unblock dovecot/1:1.0.15-2.3

2008-11-22 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
This fixes a security bug. Thanks, Dominic. -- Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/ PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

NMUing kpax?

2008-11-22 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Hi Peter, I'm not sure why we have the urgent desire to release with stuff that is quite mature and has been in production use for years, the documentation is currently not good enough to support use by the general public per the package description, but if we're going to keep it and the