Hi,
Even though Debian is not RPM based, it's very important to have a
working Yum package in Debian, just to be able to setup all sorts of yum
based distribution in a chroot for setting-up VMs.
Unfortunately, it seems that the current maintainer of Yum in Debian
haven't been active for a long
Thomas Goirand wrote:
Hi,
Even though Debian is not RPM based, it's very important to have a
working Yum package in Debian, just to be able to setup all sorts of yum
based distribution in a chroot for setting-up VMs.
Indeed.
Unfortunately, it seems that the current maintainer of Yum in
I forgot to add...
The current maintainer of yum AND rpm (Anibal Monsalve Salazar
ani...@debian.org) has been unactive for quite a long time now, there
are outstanding very serious bugs without even any reply from him since
2006. We really need something to be done for rpm as well.
I have
Thomas Goirand wrote:
I forgot to add...
The current maintainer of yum AND rpm (Anibal Monsalve Salazar
ani...@debian.org) has been unactive for quite a long time now, there
are outstanding very serious bugs without even any reply from him since
2006. We really need something to be done for
* Praveen A [Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:49:51 -0800]:
2009/2/13 Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com:
I'm going to be building CDs tomorrow. If you want to carry on doing
translations for a little longer, it's up to you. Just please make
sure that whatever's in place on the website at midnight tonight
* Joerg Jaspert [Sat, 14 Feb 2009 00:48:40 +0100]:
I tried rmadison, but that is/was broken:
$ rmadison dhcp3
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/local/bin/dak, line 248, in ?
main()
File /usr/local/bin/dak, line 243, in main
module.main()
File
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 01:45:52PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 04:07:15PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
As promised to various people, just a quick heads-up of the likely
image names and layout for the lenny build at the weekend. I've been
doing test runs today and the
* Bastian Blank:
GnuTLS stopped accepting MD5 as a proper signature type for certificates
just two weeks before the release. While I don't question the decision
themself, MD5 is broken since 4 years, I question the timing.
GNUTLS has rejected RSA-MD5 signatures in X.509 certificate chains
* Rafael Laboissiere raf...@debian.org [2009-01-07 13:45]:
[N.B.: This message is being sent to the maintainers of all packages that
currently depend on libsuitesparse-3.1.0.]
The new upstream package SuiteSparse version 3.2.0 is now in experimental.
When it will be uploaded to unstable
On 2009-02-14 Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de wrote:
* Bastian Blank:
GnuTLS stopped accepting MD5 as a proper signature type for certificates
just two weeks before the release. While I don't question the decision
themself, MD5 is broken since 4 years, I question the timing.
GNUTLS has
On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 10:08:49 +0100
Luk Claes l...@debian.org wrote:
Thomas Goirand wrote:
Hi,
Even though Debian is not RPM based, it's very important to have a
working Yum package in Debian, just to be able to setup all sorts
of yum based distribution in a chroot for setting-up VMs.
Luk Claes wrote:
Why is the python-iniparse also needed? That's not clear from the bug
report.
Very simple: yum crashes with a not-so-nice error message when I try to
boostrap a CentOS complaining about the iniparse python module not being
present.
I should have add it to the bug report, but
Thomas Goirand wrote:
Luk Claes wrote:
Why is the python-iniparse also needed? That's not clear from the bug
report.
Very simple: yum crashes with a not-so-nice error message when I try to
boostrap a CentOS complaining about the iniparse python module not being
present.
I should have
Maybe we already in release time to Lenny, but check if is possible get
firestarter from SID, because this bug[1] do it unusable (it desapear
after sometime running).
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=498546
Best regards,
Renato S. Yamane
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Florian Weimer wrote:
Yesterday several people started to complain that they could not longer
connect to their ldap servers, many of them using pam-ldap and nss-ldap.
A quick look showed certificates in the chain which was signed with MD5.
Are you sure this isn't #514807?
Also see
Hi,
That may certainly come late, but having the proposed Lenny banner on the
website would be great.
The change is very minor and checked (in template/debian/mainpage.wml
for all languages).
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 12:49:09AM +0100, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
Debian Lenny banner on the wiki
Hi,
It just came to my attention that the pidgin-otr package completely
failed to
ship translation files along with the software. The fix is trivial
(see interdiff
below), I just uploaded to unstable a new package which solves this
issue.
I believe it's already too late to get it
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 02:04:08AM +0100, Simon Paillard wrote:
That may certainly come late, but having the proposed Lenny banner on the
website would be great.
The change is very minor and checked (in template/debian/mainpage.wml
for all languages).
Commited !
--
Simon Paillard
--
To
* Simon Paillard [Sun, 15 Feb 2009 08:38:24 +0100]:
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 02:04:08AM +0100, Simon Paillard wrote:
That may certainly come late, but having the proposed Lenny banner on the
website would be great.
The change is very minor and checked (in template/debian/mainpage.wml
for
19 matches
Mail list logo
