Re: Can libweather-com-perl get updated in stable?

2009-02-28 Thread Christoph Haas
On Freitag, 27. Februar 2009, Luk Claes wrote: Christoph Haas wrote: On Samstag, 21. Februar 2009, Luk Claes wrote: Christoph Haas wrote: I have just updated the libweather-com-perl package [0] because since beginning of May it has stopped working due to a protocol change of the used

More give-backs on alpha

2009-02-28 Thread Arthur Loiret
Hi, Here are some more packages which should build fine because Build-Dependencies are now available on alpha: gb ldtp_1.5.0-1 . alpha gb me-tv_0.7.14-1 . alpha gb tracker_0.6.90-2 . alpha And here are some failures I cannot reproduce, maybe they worth try a give-back too: gb

[alpha] Dep-Wait on jack-audio-connection-kit (= 0.116.1-4)

2009-02-28 Thread Arthur Loiret
Hi, The following packages are failing because jack-audio-connection-kit_0.116.1-4 is not Uploaded on alpha yet: dw gnuradio_3.0.4-2 . alpha . -m 'jack-audio-connection-kit (= 0.116.1-4)' dw gst-plugins-bad0.10_0.10.10-3 . alpha . -m 'jack-audio-connection-kit (= 0.116.1-4)' dw

Re: Please unblock glib2.0 and gtk+2.0

2009-02-28 Thread Otavio Salvador
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org writes: Hi, glib2.0 and gtk+2.0 should be ready to migrate to squeeze today. Since they contain udebs, they need manual handling. Could you please unblock them? Ack; since major issues has been solve I belive

Re: Please unblock glib2.0 and gtk+2.0

2009-02-28 Thread Luk Claes
Otavio Salvador wrote: Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org writes: Hi, glib2.0 and gtk+2.0 should be ready to migrate to squeeze today. Since they contain udebs, they need manual handling. Could you please unblock them? Ack; since major issues has been solve I belive we're ok to go with

please unblock mdadm 2.6.8-12-gb47dff6-2

2009-02-28 Thread martin f krafft
please unblock mdadm 2.6.8-12-gb47dff6-2 PS: why are udeb-providers blocked right after a stable release? -- .''`. martin f. krafft madd...@d.o Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck

flpsed stable update required

2009-02-28 Thread Kapil Hari Paranjape
Hello, The bug #517521 was filed by me today based on a report sent directly to me on 4th February 2009. Unfortunately, I didn't see it until recently so lenny has got flpsed with an RC bug. The problem is as follows. flpsed uses the x11alpha driver of gs to create a view of the postscript page

Re: Please unblock glib2.0 and gtk+2.0

2009-02-28 Thread Otavio Salvador
Luk Claes l...@debian.org writes: Otavio Salvador wrote: Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org writes: Hi, glib2.0 and gtk+2.0 should be ready to migrate to squeeze today. Since they contain udebs, they need manual handling. Could you please unblock them? Ack; since major issues has been

Re: Please unblock glib2.0 and gtk+2.0

2009-02-28 Thread Luk Claes
Otavio Salvador wrote: Luk Claes l...@debian.org writes: Otavio Salvador wrote: Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org writes: Hi, glib2.0 and gtk+2.0 should be ready to migrate to squeeze today. Since they contain udebs, they need manual handling. Could you please unblock them? Ack; since

Re: please unblock mdadm 2.6.8-12-gb47dff6-2

2009-02-28 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 2:33 AM, martin f krafft madd...@debian.org wrote: please unblock mdadm 2.6.8-12-gb47dff6-2 PS: why are udeb-providers blocked right after a stable release? They are always blocked (before, after and during the freeze) so that the installer team has to approve each

Re: please unblock mdadm 2.6.8-12-gb47dff6-2

2009-02-28 Thread Otavio Salvador
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes: On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 2:33 AM, martin f krafft madd...@debian.org wrote: please unblock mdadm 2.6.8-12-gb47dff6-2 PS: why are udeb-providers blocked right after a stable release? They are always blocked

Re: flpsed stable update required

2009-02-28 Thread Kapil Hari Paranjape
Hello, On Sat, 28 Feb 2009, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote: The (tiny) patch that fixes this is enclosed. Please let me know if it is OK to upload 0.5.1-2 with this patch to stable. An explanation regarding the version number 0.5.1-2 for the lenny update. I am currently packaging 0.5.2-1 for

Replacing defoma [was: Removing orphaned packages from testing]

2009-02-28 Thread Paul Hardy
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote: On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Raphael Geissert atomo64+deb...@gmail.com wrote: If there are 148 packages there should be at least what, 20 maintainers? (I would hope there are far more) why don't they, or the fonts team,

Re: Replacing defoma [was: Removing orphaned packages from testing]

2009-02-28 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Paul Hardy unifoun...@gmail.com wrote: Do you have enough familiarity with defoma to put together a guide for font maintainers to transition from defoma to whatever the alternative will be?  Should we just use fontconfig for TrueType/OpenType fonts? I use

libcgi-application-plugins-perl for lenny r1? (fwd)

2009-02-28 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
I thought I had sent this out a couple of days ago but apparently not but in case you are seeing this twice, sorry. Oh and please Cc me on replies. Bug #470890 reported that the CGI::Application::Plugin::ActionDispatch perl module in libcgi-application-plugins-perl 0.10 from lenny included