Quoting W. Martin Borgert (deba...@debian.org):
On 2009-03-21 07:44, Christian Perrier wrote:
Martin, I think the proposed schedule is OK.
It's now published here:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianReleases/PointReleases/5.0.1#ReleaseNotesSchedule
THanks.
I add dle to the list of CC. I think
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 10:49:50PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
It appears that shorewall-{common,perl,shell} are in need of hinting in
order to propogate. I'd appreciate if someone could hint them.
easy hint added.
Neil
--
[..] Debian (in the form of a large, busy, and frequently
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 04:45:14PM -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
Hi!
ImageMagick in Lenny has non-free fonts with it (see bug #510751).
The proposed update is to upload the current version in testing
Please upload.
Neil
--
jmtd irssiproxy appears to be crack cut with washing up
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
Hi release team,
Hi Javier
I would like to make an upload to stable to fix bug 503992 of Snort. Basicly,
this bug was introduced with the patch for a security vulnerability but
introduced a sigsegv due to an improper call to a function. This error kills
* Luk Claes:
I would like to make an upload to stable to fix bug 503992 of Snort. Basicly,
this bug was introduced with the patch for a security vulnerability but
introduced a sigsegv due to an improper call to a function. This error kills
the Snort IDS as soon as it receives fragmented
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 03:39:40PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Luk Claes:
Any reason why this regression caused by a security upload, should not
be fixed by a security upload (I've put the Security Team in Cc)?
No reason, I just thought this would not be considered a security bug.
It's
* Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña:
It's probably a security bug on its own, so it probably should go
through the DSA process, even though the bug was introduced through
t-p-u before the lenny release.
Since Neil answered already I uploaded the packages to stable using the patch
I sent. If
Dear Stable Release Managers,
After a first upload which you approved and entered s-p-u, we (Samba
package maintainers) would like to upload a second update for packages
in lenny.
This update's changelog is:
samba (2:3.2.5-4lenny2) stable-proposed-updates; urgency=low
* Do not abort rename
tags 520713 + fixed-upstream patch pending
thanks
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 10:54:52AM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
Package: schroot
Version: 1.2.1-1
Severity: critical
On goetz (our alpha buildd) the init script's start action hangs, causing the
system to not boot up cleanly.
Following
Christian Perrier wrote:
Dear Stable Release Managers,
After a first upload which you approved and entered s-p-u, we (Samba
package maintainers) would like to upload a second update for packages
in lenny.
This update's changelog is:
samba (2:3.2.5-4lenny2) stable-proposed-updates;
Hi
The upcoming point releases for both Etch and Lenny are planned for
April 4th.
Please have a look at the respective websites [0] [1] [2] for a more or
less up-to-date status of the preparations.
Security updates that are complete could still make it till after March
28th, though this has to
On 2009-03-22 20:26, Luk Claes wrote:
@jens+debacle: Can you please try to have the Release Notes as
up-to-date as possible, TIA?
These days are busy for me. Any help very much appreciated!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Le dimanche 22 mars 2009 à 20:26 +0100, Luk Claes a écrit :
Please have a look at the respective websites [0] [1] [2] for a more or
less up-to-date status of the preparations.
The installer team requested that gtk+ 2.12.12 made it soon enough for
the d-i update, but I see it is still pending.
gnome-libs has been removed from unstable. Please remove the two remaining
packages using it from testing: powershell and soundtracker
RC bugs are in place so that they can't migrate back before they've been
fixed.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi again,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Philipp Kern wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 08:47:34PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
* debian/control.in:
- build-conflict against g++-4.3 ( 4.3.2-1.1) (reason: #514839)
Um, I don't like that. For one: what happens when g++ is updated in
Hrm,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org writes:
Le dimanche 22 mars 2009 à 20:26 +0100, Luk Claes a écrit :
Please have a look at the respective websites [0] [1] [2] for a more or
less up-to-date status of the preparations.
The installer team requested
16 matches
Mail list logo
