The latest debian/control for mpi-defaults [1], version 0.4, has:
Source: mpi-defaults
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5.0),
libopenmpi-dev (= 1.2.4-5) [i386 amd64 ia64 powerpc kfreebsd-i386
kfreebsd-amd64],
openmpi-bin [i386 amd64 ia64 powerpc kfreebsd-i386 kfreebsd-amd64],
lam4-dev [!i386
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 08:48:06AM +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
The latest debian/control for mpi-defaults [1], version 0.4, has:
This means that the dep-waits I see in [2] for alpha (libopenmpi-dev (=
1.3)) and sparc (libopenmpi-dev (= 1.3-2)) are probably wrong.
[1]
* Riku Voipio riku.voi...@iki.fi [2009-03-24 10:01]:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 08:48:06AM +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
The latest debian/control for mpi-defaults [1], version 0.4, has:
This means that the dep-waits I see in [2] for alpha (libopenmpi-dev (=
1.3)) and sparc
Le lundi 23 mars 2009 à 22:37 +0100, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
one of the packages blocking the evolution transition (modest) is
completely broken since the upload of GTK+ 2.14, and not likely to be
fixed soon, according to the bug log.
Therefore, could someone please hint hildonfm and
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009, Josselin Mouette wrote:
one of the packages blocking the evolution transition (modest) is
completely broken since the upload of GTK+ 2.14, and not likely to be
fixed soon, according to the bug log.
Sorry, which bug?
Therefore, could someone please hint hildonfm and
Hello,
the dpkg team and the texinfo maintainer have laid out a plan to
get rid of dpkg /usr/sbin/install-info and start relying on
GNU's install-info when needed. This will involve some work to
transition properly. We have described our plan here:
Could emdebian-tools be unblocked please so that 1.6.0 can migrate into
testing in a few days time?
Thanks.
(Is there a different way to do this - iirc it is only because of the
udeb which is not incorporated into d-i directly at this time - it's
only used when d-i is used by Emdebian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 05:34:24PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
Following finding the cause of this failure, I'd like to propose
the following patch (attached) to correct it. This is also in
git; the last five commits on the schroot-lenny branch:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:34:05PM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Peter Palfrader said:
#517183 segv on startup makes irqbalance completely broken on our
sparcs.
There has been a patch in the BTS for a bit over 10 days now, yet it
is still unresolved in sid
This one time, at band camp, Philipp Kern said:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:34:05PM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Peter Palfrader said:
#517183 segv on startup makes irqbalance completely broken on our
sparcs.
There has been a patch in the BTS for a bit
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 04:35:07PM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
Sorry about the changelog entry - that was just me creating an interrim
package on the machine with issues to see if it would work. The
information is in the bug report, but I'll recap.
The current situation is that irqbalance
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Neil Williams wrote:
Could emdebian-tools be unblocked please so that 1.6.0 can migrate into
testing in a few days time?
unblocked
(Is there a different way to do this - iirc it is only because of the
udeb which is not incorporated into d-i directly at this time - it's
only used when d-i is
Loïc Minier wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009, Josselin Mouette wrote:
one of the packages blocking the evolution transition (modest) is
completely broken since the upload of GTK+ 2.14, and not likely to be
fixed soon, according to the bug log.
Sorry, which bug?
Therefore, could someone
Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
The latest debian/control for mpi-defaults [1], version 0.4, has:
Source: mpi-defaults
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5.0),
libopenmpi-dev (= 1.2.4-5) [i386 amd64 ia64 powerpc kfreebsd-i386
kfreebsd-amd64],
openmpi-bin [i386 amd64 ia64 powerpc kfreebsd-i386
Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
* Riku Voipio riku.voi...@iki.fi [2009-03-24 10:01]:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 08:48:06AM +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
The latest debian/control for mpi-defaults [1], version 0.4, has:
This means that the dep-waits I see in [2] for alpha (libopenmpi-dev (=
1.3))
Otavio Salvador wrote:
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org writes:
Le dimanche 22 mars 2009 à 20:26 +0100, Luk Claes a écrit :
Please have a look at the respective websites [0] [1] [2] for a more or
less up-to-date status of the preparations.
The installer team requested that gtk+ 2.12.12 made
Michael Biebl wrote:
Hi,
avrdude has failed to build because of broken build-deps which should be fixed
by now.
gb avrdude_5.6-1 . sparc
given back
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
I'd like to add support for the D-Link DNS-323 to the upcoming point
release: these patches were available before lenny was out, have been
tested in the meantime by a number of people and are very small and
low impact. The tools and kernel needed to support this device are
already in lenny, so we
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Martin Michlmayr t...@cyrius.com wrote:
I'd like to add support for the D-Link DNS-323 to the upcoming point
release: these patches were available before lenny was out, have been
tested in the meantime by a number of people and are very small and
low impact.
* Luk Claes l...@debian.org [2009-03-24 19:36]:
Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
Another one:
dw arpack_2.1+parpack96.dfsg-2 . alpha . -m 'mpi-default-dev (= 0.4)'
Well first needed to reset the existing dep-wait or they would be
merged, though done now.
Just curious: how do you reset a
* Rafael Laboissiere [Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:49:58 +0100]:
* Luk Claes l...@debian.org [2009-03-24 19:36]:
Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
Another one:
dw arpack_2.1+parpack96.dfsg-2 . alpha . -m 'mpi-default-dev (= 0.4)'
Well first needed to reset the existing dep-wait or they would be
* Stefan Fritsch [Mon, 23 Mar 2009 12:24:22 +0100]:
Hi,
I received bug #519949 about mp3gain 1.4.6-7 calculating wrong results
on i386.
This is probably due to my build chroot not being up-to-date and gcc
4.1 having bug #429657 at the time of the upload. I have checked one
arch per gcc
* Steve M. Robbins [Sat, 21 Mar 2009 18:00:44 -0500]:
If there's something for us Boost packagers to do in order
that Boost 1.38 be accepted into Debian, I'd really like to
know about it.
You can upload the ???boost1.38??? source package any time you want (which I
guess will be as
* Adeodato Simó [Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:50:41 +0100]:
If you’ve made a sourceful upload, I don’t think there’s a need for a
Bin-NMU?
Sorry, I failed to notice “lenny” in the subject. It is normally better
to make the body self-contained. ;-)
Anyway, Bin-NMU in Lenny scheduled.
--
- Are you
Luk Claes l...@debian.org writes:
Neil Williams wrote:
Could emdebian-tools be unblocked please so that 1.6.0 can migrate into
testing in a few days time?
unblocked
(Is there a different way to do this - iirc it is only because of the
udeb which is not incorporated into d-i directly at
27 matches
Mail list logo
