Re: Testing removals for GTK 1.2 removal

On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 10:52:13AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: + Moritz Muehlenhoff (Wed, 22 Apr 2009 19:05:38 +0200): Or maybe I'm misunderstanding you and uninstallable packages are removed automatically from testing? On the contrary, it’s gtk1.2 and imlib that britney won’t remove

Re: [pkg-boost-devel] Upload of Boost 1.38

On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 12:29:04AM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: P.S. After boost-defaults is uploaded, the archive will have two source packages (boost, boost-defaults) that both produce the binary package libboost-dev. Won't that cause a problem? Does something need to be adjusted to

Re: give back for gnome-mount and eiciel

+ Michael Biebl (Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:59:48 +0200): Hi, Hello, Michael. please give back the following packages. Their build dependencies should be available by now: gb eiciel_0.9.6.1-3 . mipsel gb gnome-mount_0.8-2 . mipsel No, the build-dependencies of these (libnautilus-extension-dev

Re: Give-back for NM related packages

+ Michael Biebl (Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:52:01 +0200): Hi, due to latest transitions in gtk, pango and gconf, a few of the NM related packages failed to build due to unmet b-deps. This should be fixed by now. Please give back: gb network-manager-openvpn_0.7.1-1 . mips gb

Re: asterisk stable update for CVE-2009-0041

On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 03:40:35PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote: Hi, the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities Exposures) id was published for asterisk some time ago. CVE-2009-0041[0]: | IAX2 in Asterisk Open Source 1.2.x before 1.2.31, 1.4.x before | 1.4.23-rc4, and 1.6.x before 1.6.0.3-rc2;

[SRM] Another permission to upload samba in s-p-u, to fix #520794

Would it be OK to upload this to s-p-u? Yes, please upload. I have another one..:-) In #520794, a memory leak was reported when users use the full_audit VFS module along with Samba. It was corrected upstream in 3.2.8 with the attached patch. One of the users affected by the bug reported

Re: [SRM] Another permission to upload samba in s-p-u, to fix #520794

Quoting Christian Perrier (bubu...@debian.org): Would it be OK to upload this to s-p-u? Yes, please upload. I have another one..:-) In #520794, a memory leak was reported when users use the full_audit VFS module along with Samba. It was corrected upstream in 3.2.8 with the

uploading fix for #517205 in slime to stable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello all, Evgeny noticed that bug #517205 was also present in the stable package: xref.lisp was by mistake included in the upstream tarball. Luca proposed: I would just repackage upstream as 20080223: = l...@gismo:~$ dpkg --compare-versions

Re: [SRM] Another permission to upload samba in s-p-u, to fix #520794

Christian Perrier wrote: Quoting Christian Perrier (bubu...@debian.org): Would it be OK to upload this to s-p-u? Yes, please upload. I have another one..:-) In #520794, a memory leak was reported when users use the full_audit VFS module along with Samba. It was corrected upstream in

Re: uploading fix for #517205 in slime to stable

Peter Van Eynde wrote: Hello all, Evgeny noticed that bug #517205 was also present in the stable package: xref.lisp was by mistake included in the upstream tarball. Luca proposed: I would just repackage upstream as 20080223: = l...@gismo:~$ dpkg --compare-versions 1:20080223-2 lt

gcc-4.4 gcj-4.4/java-common uploads to unstable

Planning a gcc-4.4 upload for unstable for next week. It's not a transition (not changing any GCC defaults), but is likely to delay transitions of other packages due to new symbols in the various GCC runtime libraries. For now I'm not aware of any regressions in the runtime libraries, however