On 15/06/09 at 11:31 -0600, Grant Grundler wrote:
I was expecting a summary of specific issues from an organization
that claims to operate transperently. The hand waving is easy. But
doesn't resolve problems and doesn't meet my expectation of an open
organization that I've donated money,
Hi,
I might have missed something (I'm not familiar with this new Breaks field)
but it seems to me that libxml++2.6 2.26.0-2 shouldn't have migrated to
testing untill gnote ( 0.4) had been superceded:
libxml++2.6 (2.26.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Mark libxml++2.6-2 Breaks: gnote ( 0.4) due
Hello Pascal,
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:58 AM, Pascal
Vandeputtedebian-b...@asmodeus.be wrote:
[...]
# ls -al initrd-{amd64,i386}/usr/share/keyrings/archive.gpg
-rw-r--r-- 1 pvdputte pvdputte 4148 2009-06-16 10:42
initrd-amd64/usr/share/keyrings/archive.gpg
-rw-r--r-- 1 pvdputte pvdputte 5801
Hi,
I hope Jonas Smedegaard is around and watching :-)
As you will see in BTS #449973, upstream states:
without some GUI dialog implementation, it's nearly useless. so other
than sentimental attachment, i don't see much point for it to remain in
debian...
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 19:00 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
Hi,
Last week OpenMPI transitioned to a new shared library package,
reflecting an ABI change to version 1.3.x (which wasn't reflected in the
shared lib package name of 1.3-2).
From what I can see, it looks like there are at least
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 07:03:11PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
libbtctl
gnome-vfs-obexftp
shall be removed, will file bugs
what's the best way to proceed?
binNMUs scheduled.
Best way is to track the binNMUs and the packages that need an updated
build dependency to make sure
Sam Hartman wrote:
Hi. Thanks for all your help with the binary NMUs and for analyzing
my plans and giving suggestions.
Hi Sam
I'm assuming there are some complications I don't know about it as
debian-release currently has a block on krb5.
I guess that's only because it's not ready to
Mathieu Parent wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Luk Claesl...@debian.org wrote:
Mathieu Parent wrote:
Hi,
kolabd and libkolab-perl are not entering testing whereas the 10-days
delay is over and no dependency is missing.
This probably comes from kolabconf which has been
Otavio Salvador wrote:
Hello Pascal,
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:58 AM, Pascal
Vandeputtedebian-b...@asmodeus.be wrote:
[...]
# ls -al initrd-{amd64,i386}/usr/share/keyrings/archive.gpg
-rw-r--r-- 1 pvdputte pvdputte 4148 2009-06-16 10:42
initrd-amd64/usr/share/keyrings/archive.gpg
Osamu Aoki wrote:
Hi,
I hope Jonas Smedegaard is around and watching :-)
As you will see in BTS #449973, upstream states:
without some GUI dialog implementation, it's nearly useless. so other
than sentimental attachment, i don't see much point for it to remain in
debian...
Robert Millan wrote:
Hi,
I might have missed something (I'm not familiar with this new Breaks field)
but it seems to me that libxml++2.6 2.26.0-2 shouldn't have migrated to
testing untill gnote ( 0.4) had been superceded:
libxml++2.6 (2.26.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Mark
Adam C Powell IV wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 19:00 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
Hi,
Last week OpenMPI transitioned to a new shared library package,
reflecting an ABI change to version 1.3.x (which wasn't reflected in the
shared lib package name of 1.3-2).
From what I can see, it looks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:19:44PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
Hi,
I hope Jonas Smedegaard is around and watching :-)
Huh - am I allowed to watch only?!?
As you will see in BTS #449973, upstream states:
without some GUI dialog implementation,
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 09:08:37PM +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
On 06/16/2009 08:25 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 15/06/09 at 11:31 -0600, Grant Grundler wrote:
PS: if you want an HPPA-specific issue to play with,
On 06/16/2009 08:25 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 15/06/09 at 11:31 -0600, Grant Grundler wrote:
PS: if you want an HPPA-specific issue to play with,
http://experimental.debian.net/fetch.php?pkg=ruby1.9ver=1.9.0.1-5arch=hppastamp=1213563978file=logas=raw
might be a good candidate.
In reality
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 08:05:29PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
In the meantime, it's uninstallable (see #533216).
Any ideas on how can this be fixed? Maybe a gnote upload to tpu?
That would indeed be an option.
Okay, gnote_0.4.0-3~squeeze1 uploaded to tpu. Please consider unblocking.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 08:25:31AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
...
BTW, that firewall was reviewed and approved by Lamont (a pretty well
known DD and buildd maintainer).
Thibaut Varene (who is a DD) has offered to host HPPA buildd machines
as well but hasn't heard any response to that
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 02:50:27PM -0600, Grant Grundler wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 08:25:31AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
...
BTW, that firewall was reviewed and approved by Lamont (a pretty well
known DD and buildd maintainer).
Thibaut Varene (who is a DD) has offered to host
This one time, at band camp, dann frazier said:
Are we still having random segfaults on paer? If so - that's be a good
one to resolve. Not sure if DSA would be willing to grant (heh) you
access to that box, or if we should try running a dummy buildd on
another rp2470.
We're running paer on a
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 12:01:31AM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
This one time, at band camp, dann frazier said:
Are we still having random segfaults on paer? If so - that's be a good
one to resolve. Not sure if DSA would be willing to grant (heh) you
access to that box, or if we should try
20 matches
Mail list logo
