Re: HPPA and Squeeze

> > I've pretty much localized the problem. It's a GCC middle-end bug. > > The problem is in passing a complex double from a thunk. The hppa > > specification says that values larger than 64 bits are passed by > > reference in the 32-bit runtime. However, the value is in a pair > > of registers

Re: HPPA and Squeeze

On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 06:25:20PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote: > > > I've never been able to file any (non-automated) bug report in > > > 5 minutes. And if you don't even have direct access to the > > > hardware it takes longer. > > > > I agree. I'm trying to build netgen here too and if the

Re: HPPA and Squeeze

> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 05:15:26PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > Here is a list of packages that failed to build because of instability > > on the buildds today: > > package | buildd | error > > qgit| penalosa | make: *** [install] Segmentation fault > > acpica-unix | peri | mak

Re: HPPA and Squeeze

> > I've never been able to file any (non-automated) bug report in > > 5 minutes. And if you don't even have direct access to the > > hardware it takes longer. > > I agree. I'm trying to build netgen here too and if the ICE is easy to > reproduce, can make that available to danglin and add to the

Re: HPPA and Squeeze

On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 07:48:38PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: ... > I know how to file gcc bugs. I've just filed one. I didn't > have time to try and reduce the testcase, and I can't try > different versions of g++ yet. I've asked to have different > versions installed on paer. > > The bug repor

Re: HPPA and Squeeze

On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 12:02:54PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 05:15:26PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > > So it's my understanding that the porters have no idea about the > > > problems. So I will start to mail you about problems as soon > > > as I see them and they

Re: HPPA and Squeeze

> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 05:15:26PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > So it's my understanding that the porters have no idea about the > > problems. So I will start to mail you about problems as soon > > as I see them and they look like porting issues specific > > to hppa. > > netgen fails to built

Re: Upcoming Lenny Point Release

On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 11:19:59AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > dann frazier wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 08:25:00PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > >> Hi there, > >> > >> we intend to do a Lenny Point Release on Saturday, June 20th. We will > >> clear stable NEW in the coming days and then declar

Re: HPPA and Squeeze

On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 05:15:26PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: >> So it's my understanding that the porters have no idea about the >> problems.  So I will start to mail you about problems as soon >> as I see them and they look like porting issues

Re: HPPA and Squeeze

On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 05:15:26PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > So it's my understanding that the porters have no idea about the > problems. So I will start to mail you about problems as soon > as I see them and they look like porting issues specific > to hppa. Ruby1.9 hangs in test_thread.rb and

Re: HPPA and Squeeze

On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 05:15:26PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > So it's my understanding that the porters have no idea about the > problems. So I will start to mail you about problems as soon > as I see them and they look like porting issues specific > to hppa. netgen fails to built with an intern

Re: SuiteSparse 3.2.0->3.3.0 transition

Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > * Adeodato Simó [2009-05-26 20:40]: > >> + Rafael Laboissiere (Sun, 10 May 2009 14:57:15 +0200): >> >>> The upstream authors of SuiteSparse have released version 3.3.0. If we >>> package this version for Debian, we will have to go through another >>> library transitio

upload to stable: berusky

Hello, I would like to apply the attached patch to the game package "berusky" in lenny stable. | Problem description: The level hint shown is the hint for | the first level of the level set, not the hint for the | selected level. | Solution: Set the level number before the level hint is shown

Re: Please binNMU tuxcmd (fpc fixed powerpc builds in 2.2.4-3)

Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hello > > tuxcmd had the problem that it didn't work on powerpc when build with > earlier versions of fpc. This seems to be fixed with fpc_2.2.4-3 in > unstable. Thus I request a binNMU for tuxcmd to be build with the new > version of fpc. > > nmu tuxcmd_0.6.50-5 . p

Re: Removal hint for belocs-locales-bin and belocs-locales-data

Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > Hi. > > Both belocs-locales-bin and belocs-locales-data where removed from > unstable some time ago, but seem to block each others removal from > testing. Removal hint added, tnx. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Re: s-p-u upload permission for gthumb

David Paleino wrote: > Hello, > yesterday a user reported #533641 (gthumb) in Lenny. It's not a major bug, but > it's still a bug, and the fix is really a one-line patch: > > > http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/gthumb.git;a=blob;f=debian/patches/10-dont_follow_symlinks_on_dups_search.patch;

Please binNMU tuxcmd (fpc fixed powerpc builds in 2.2.4-3)

Hello tuxcmd had the problem that it didn't work on powerpc when build with earlier versions of fpc. This seems to be fixed with fpc_2.2.4-3 in unstable. Thus I request a binNMU for tuxcmd to be build with the new version of fpc. nmu tuxcmd_0.6.50-5 . powerpc . -m 'Rebuild with fpc 2.2.4-3.' Tha

Removal hint for belocs-locales-bin and belocs-locales-data

Hi. Both belocs-locales-bin and belocs-locales-data where removed from unstable some time ago, but seem to block each others removal from testing. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "un

s-p-u upload permission for gthumb

Hello, yesterday a user reported #533641 (gthumb) in Lenny. It's not a major bug, but it's still a bug, and the fix is really a one-line patch: http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/gthumb.git;a=blob;f=debian/patches/10-dont_follow_symlinks_on_dups_search.patch;hb=lenny Do I have permission to

Re: new freedoom packages for stable and oldstable to fix copyvio

On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 09:53:02AM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote: > > oldstable: > > > > There seems to be some graphic corruption in this one that I > forgot about. The lenny package seems fine though. I've > removed this one until I fi

Next point release and the Installer

Hi Can someone prepare a short summary of the changes in the next stable point release that affect the Installer to include in the announcement? At least the cdebconf improvements (especially important for Debian Edu) and the choose-mirror changes (installing Etch with Lenny's installer) are note

Re: Upcoming Lenny Point Release

dann frazier wrote: > On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 08:25:00PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: >> Hi there, >> >> we intend to do a Lenny Point Release on Saturday, June 20th. We will >> clear stable NEW in the coming days and then declare the point release >> frozen. Please hurry up if you still need somet

Re: new freedoom packages for stable and oldstable to fix copyvio

On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 12:49:39AM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote: > I have uploaded the new packages to a temporary repository > at : > > oldstable: > There seems to be some graphic corruption in this one

Please hint apache2 into testing

Hi, please hint apache2_2.2.11-6 and apache2-mpm-itk_2.2.11-02-1 into testing. Thanks. Stefan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Upcoming Lenny Point Release

On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 08:25:00PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > Hi there, > > we intend to do a Lenny Point Release on Saturday, June 20th. We will > clear stable NEW in the coming days and then declare the point release > frozen. Please hurry up if you still need something to go into Lenny > at