Mike Massonnet wrote:
Hello,
Hi
Regarding bug #529306, there is a possible detection of the xauth
magic-cookie. The attached debdiff file adds two patches to the
current slim package in Lenny. The first that instead of setting the
mcookie within the command line of xauth, it passes it
Peter Palfrader wrote:
Hi,
Subversion-tools in lenny contains a commit email script, which
unfortunately sends broken mails (all the headers are part of the body,
and the headers empty).
Bugs #532903 and #508301 are about this issue, which has been fixed for
sid+squeeze in late February.
Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 05:25:33PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 04:13:09PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
A minory security update (probably not something that would justify
an update on security.debian.org) has been anounced for RT3.6
Marcin Owsiany wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 05:48:47PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 09:40:52AM +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
It seems that my upload of $SUBJECT to etch-volatile [1] was never
processed, however I'd like to try and upload the fix to lenny-volatile.
Norbert Preining wrote:
Hi Luk, hi Frank,
On Do, 18 Jun 2009, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Do, 11 Jun 2009, Frank Küster wrote:
I am right now uploading an again-installable tetex-bin to
oldstable-proposed-updates (I hope that's correct?), and texlive-bin
will follow soon. Both uploads have
Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Hello,
I've prepared a patch (attached) which fixes a minor issue (#534516) for
postinst script of mldonkey but several users have already reported the
same issue.
Would it be accepted for the next point-release of lenny?
No, unless there would be a fix for a more
Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote:
[please CC]
Hey,
Hi
Would this[0] small patch be accepted as an update for the 1.22 version
of transmission in stable? It closes this[1] grave bug.
The user also requested this patch[2] to fix this[3] segfault, but I'd
understand if you guys think it's a bit
Guido Günther wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to fix #534309 for stable. The crash on shutdown is harmless but
confuses users a lot since it fills their dmesg. O.k. to upload
0.4.8-14+lenny2 with this fix:
On Di, 30 Jun 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
Please upload accordingly.
Ok, will upload the next days
texlive-base 2007.dfsg.2-1~lenny2
texlive-extra 2007.dfsg.17-1~lenny02
texlive-lang 2007.dfsg.4-1+lenny1
together with the already present/uploaded
texlive-bin
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 03:25:34AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hi Luk, hi *;
Luk Claes wrote:
The upstream authors of SuiteSparse have released version 3.3.0. If we
package this version for Debian, we will have to go through another
library transition since the package will be named
Paul Wise wrote:
Hi all,
Would it be acceptable to allow nano into testing finally? It has been
waiting for 84 days for the maintainer to request migration to testing.
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Pierre Habouzit schrieb:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 11:39:16PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
The current set of java packages (introducing java for hppa) in unstable
seem to
be ready for testing:
java-common 0.32
java-gcj-compat 1.0.80-5
gcj-4.4 4.4.0-8
gcc-defaults 1.87
Afaics only
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:37:01PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
Would it be acceptable to allow nano into testing finally? It has been
waiting for 84 days for the maintainer to request migration to testing.
I actually wasn't aware it was me who had to request a migration.
Sorry about that. :)
According to the buildd logs the openjdk-6 6b14-4 build for mipsel did finish on
Jun 20, but was not uploaded until now. Is there any interest within the mips
porters on openjdk-6 on mips*, or should we just remove it from the archive and
drop openjdk support on mips?
Matthias
--
To
Matthias Klose wrote:
According to the buildd logs the openjdk-6 6b14-4 build for mipsel did finish on
Jun 20, but was not uploaded until now. Is there any interest within the mips
porters on openjdk-6 on mips*, or should we just remove it from the archive and
drop openjdk support on mips?
Matthias Klose wrote:
According to the buildd logs the openjdk-6 6b14-4 build for mipsel did finish
on
Jun 20, but was not uploaded until now. Is there any interest within the mips
porters on openjdk-6 on mips*, or should we just remove it from the archive
and
drop openjdk support on
Nicolas Boullis wrote:
Dear release team,
Hi Nicolas
I'd like to upload a recent libcdio to unstable.
Unfortunately, as usual with libcdio, upgrading from 0.78.2 to 0.81
means breaking the ABI and changing the sonames of the libcdio and
libiso9660 libraries...
Note that libcdio 0.81-3
17 matches
Mail list logo
