Re: Remove glib1.2

2009-08-11 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le dimanche 09 août 2009 à 09:39 -0400, Barry deFreese a écrit : > >> Please remove the following packages from testing along with glib1.2. > >> I've also just filed an RC bug against glib1.2 to prevent re-migration. > > All hinted. > BTW, I think I have patches posted for pretty much all of them

Re: Bug#539687: marked as done (libogg-dev: Removal of .la should have been coordinated with other packages)

2009-08-11 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 11 août 2009 à 08:05 +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo a écrit : > I know this is 20/20 hindsight, but this could have been handled much > better by raising bugs against and fixing all the client libraries > *before* removing the libogg.la. It would probably also be a good idea > to discourage th

Re: Please binNMU agda on amd64

2009-08-11 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
Hi, On Tue Aug 11, 2009 at 23:10:24 +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > Iain Lane wrote: > > Hi, > > > > A new GHC release has been uploaded to sid since agda hit NEW. The > > binary in the archive thus has incorrect deps and is uninstallable. > > Please binNMU it. > > > > nmu agda_2.2.4+dfsg-1 . amd64 -

Re: Please binNMU agda on amd64

2009-08-11 Thread Luk Claes
Iain Lane wrote: > Hi, > > A new GHC release has been uploaded to sid since agda hit NEW. The > binary in the archive thus has incorrect deps and is uninstallable. > Please binNMU it. > > nmu agda_2.2.4+dfsg-1 . amd64 -m 'Rebuild against GHC6 6.10.4' Someone already scheduled the binNMU. Cheers

Re: RM: libgio-fam/testing [i386 alpha amd64 armel hppa ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc] -- ROM; NBS on linux arches

2009-08-11 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 20:35 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> Adam D. Barratt wrote: >>> On Sat, 2009-08-08 at 14:29 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: glib2.0 has been in unstable for 41 days, according to [1] Could it be unblocked so that it migrate

Re: RM: libgio-fam/testing [i386 alpha amd64 armel hppa ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc] -- ROM; NBS on linux arches

2009-08-11 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 20:35 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Sat, 2009-08-08 at 14:29 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > >> glib2.0 has been in unstable for 41 days, according to [1] > >> > >> Could it be unblocked so that it migrates to testing? > > > > Unb

RM: libgio-fam/testing [i386 alpha amd64 armel hppa ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc] -- ROM; NBS on linux arches

2009-08-11 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, 2009-08-08 at 14:29 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> glib2.0 has been in unstable for 41 days, according to [1] >> >> Could it be unblocked so that it migrates to testing? > > Unblocked, after ack from Otavio. > > You'll need to get ftp-master to remove the

Please binNMU agda on amd64

2009-08-11 Thread Iain Lane
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, A new GHC release has been uploaded to sid since agda hit NEW. The binary in the archive thus has incorrect deps and is uninstallable. Please binNMU it. nmu agda_2.2.4+dfsg-1 . amd64 -m 'Rebuild against GHC6 6.10.4' Regards, Iain -BEGI

Re: libjpegv7 transition

2009-08-11 Thread Pierre Habouzit
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 10:20:37PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 07:21:17PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > > Bill Allombert wrote: > > > > Please upload to experimental so we get an idea on the possible impact > > and have it NEW processed etc, TIA. > > Actually I uploaded lib