On Sat, 2009-08-08 at 13:45 +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
Debian Lenny was shipped with mod-wsgi v2.3. Upstream released two new
bug fix versions since then - 2.4 and 2.5 (with bug fixes mostly
backported from developement branch - 3.x). Since upstream changelog
mentions[1] also new features
Fathi Boudra wrote:
Hi,
please rebuild libclucene-dev reverse b-dependencies:
Package: bongoproject
Package: bibletime
Package: kdebase-runtime
Package: soprano
Package: strigi
Package: sword
libclucene0ldbl was renamed to libclucene0 on 0.9.21b-1 upload.
binNMUs scheduled
Cheers
Chow Loong Jin wrote:
Hello,
There was recently a new release of Geany (= 0.18) in which the plugin
ABI was broken, hence requiring that all plugins be rebuilt in order to
be loaded by Geany.
nmu geany-plugins_0.17.1-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against new geany
(Closes: #542716)'
binNMU
Raphael Geissert wrote:
Hi,
Please remove kio-locate from testing, as it doesn't work with KDE4 in its
current state. #540952 should be considered the removal reason and blocking
bug (as I'll be fixing the other bugs in an upload soon).
removal hint added.
Cheers
Luk
--
To
See below for upstream's response. If it's fine with you, we'll also
include this change in our upload:
| Index: mod_wsgi.c
| ===
| --- mod_wsgi.c (wersja 1351)
| +++ mod_wsgi.c (wersja 1352)
| @@ -1540,7 +1540,6 @@
|
|
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
eglibc 2.9-25 is now in unstable for 10 days without new major bugs. It
introduces the libc6 package split into libc6 + libc-bin, and libc6-dev
into libc6-dev + libc-dev-bin in preparation for multiarch.
Could you please unblock it?
Thanks in advance,
Aurelien
* Aurelien Jarno (aurel...@aurel32.net) [090828 14:17]:
eglibc 2.9-25 is now in unstable for 10 days without new major bugs. It
introduces the libc6 package split into libc6 + libc-bin, and libc6-dev
into libc6-dev + libc-dev-bin in preparation for multiarch.
Could you please unblock it?
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 07:37:30 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Florian Weimer:
* gregor herrmann:
* Bas Zoetekouw:
Could you please advice whether it's ok to upload an NMU with the above
patch to stable-security?
Sure. Please send the debdiff for review first.
Thanks, debdiff
gregor herrmann wrote:
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 07:37:30 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
Oh, and considering that CVE-2009-1391 will be fixed through
stable-proposed-updates, we should fix this bug through s-p-u, too.
So please send your final patch to debian-release@ instead of
security@ (and you need
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 07:14:28AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 00:12 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
perl (5.10.0-19lenny2) stable; urgency=low
.
* Fix a typo in the replaces/conflicts/provides: libcpan-plus-perl
should have been libcpanplus-perl. (Closes:
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:50:28 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Oh, and considering that CVE-2009-1391 will be fixed through
stable-proposed-updates, we should fix this bug through s-p-u, too.
Dear release team, attached is the debdiff for a possible upload to
s-p-u for libcompress-raw-bzip2-perl
* Luk Claes:
The most important issues seems to be that ghc6 FTBFS on ia64 [1].
Is ia64 a registerized build (if this GHC-ism is still relevant)?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Florian Weimer wrote:
* Luk Claes:
The most important issues seems to be that ghc6 FTBFS on ia64 [1].
Is ia64 a registerized build (if this GHC-ism is still relevant)?
You apparently did not include the footnote. Though if you want to ask
if it has a buildbot: unfortunately not.
Cheers
* Luk Claes:
Florian Weimer wrote:
* Luk Claes:
The most important issues seems to be that ghc6 FTBFS on ia64 [1].
Is ia64 a registerized build (if this GHC-ism is still relevant)?
You apparently did not include the footnote. Though if you want to ask
if it has a buildbot:
On Fri, August 28, 2009 11:56, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
See below for upstream's response. If it's fine with you, we'll also
include this change in our upload:
| Index: mod_wsgi.c
| ===
| --- mod_wsgi.c (wersja 1351)
| +++
[Adam D. Barratt, 2009-08-28]
Yes, that's fine. Please go ahead.
(fwiw, I almost requested that you backport some of the changes on top of
2.3 instead, but by the time I'd finished and looked at the few bits that
had ended up being left out, it didn't seem worth the effort).
If you're
Hello,
I'm looking for a sponsor for an spu update for an xscreensaver
security issue in lenny.
Debdiff is attached.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xscreensaver
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian
Hi,
Am Friday 28 August 2009 22:07:29 schrieb Florian Weimer:
* Luk Claes:
Florian Weimer wrote:
* Luk Claes:
The most important issues seems to be that ghc6 FTBFS on ia64 [1].
Is ia64 a registerized build (if this GHC-ism is still relevant)?
[..]
Sorry, I tried to make clear that
please unblock libpng 1.2.39-1
Changes:
libpng (1.2.39-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release
* Fix out-of-date-standards-version
* Fix patch-system-but-no-source-readme
please unblock pciutils 1:3.1.4-1
Changes:
pciutils (1:3.1.4-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New
19 matches
Mail list logo
