Re: Bug#548126: pu: package opensaml2/2.0-2+lenny1

2009-10-08 Thread Florian Weimer
* Florian Weimer: Right. Please upload opensaml2 first (after sending in a source debdiff for review), and then wait with uploading shibboleth-sp2 until we tell you it's okay to do so. It's now possible to upload shibboleth-sp2 to security-master. Thanks for your assistance. -- To

Bug#548969: nmu: libtorrent-rasterbar_0.14.6-1

2009-10-08 Thread Philipp Kern
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:57:33PM +0200, Cristian Greco wrote: nmu libtorrent-rasterbar_0.14.6-1 . ia64 mips mipsel powerpc sparc . -m build against boost1.40 Scheduled. Having it in testing does not really hurt because the old boost packages will only be dropped when nothing depends on them

Re: Release architectures

2009-10-08 Thread Andreas Barth
* Carlo Segre (se...@iit.edu) [091008 08:17]: On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, Andreas Barth wrote: Hi, since our recent release update, things have been moving a bit. We'd like to give you the basic status of all our architectures for Squeeze, for details please see the individual mails (and basic

Re: [Pkg-haskell-maintainers] Bug#550182: haskell-zip-archive: Links against too old haskell-digest - probably needs simple rebuild

2009-10-08 Thread Joachim Breitner
reassign 550182 release.debian.org thanks Am Donnerstag, den 08.10.2009, 10:07 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard: Package: haskell-zip-archive Severity: grave Tags: patch Justification: renders package unusable As subject says, this package has unfulfillable binary dependencies, which are

Processed: Re: [Pkg-haskell-maintainers] Bug#550182: haskell-zip-archive: Links against too old haskell-digest - probably needs simple rebuild

2009-10-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 550182 release.debian.org Bug #550182 [haskell-zip-archive] haskell-zip-archive: Links against too old haskell-digest - probably needs simple rebuild Bug reassigned from package 'haskell-zip-archive' to 'release.debian.org'. thanks

Bug#550191: wireshark 1.0.2-3+lenny6 security fixes

2009-10-08 Thread Bálint Réczey
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Severity: normal Hi, Could you please allow uploading wireshark 1.0.2-3+lenny6 to stable-security? It fixes security issues only: --- debian/changelog(revision 13620) +++ debian/changelog(revision 14468) @@ -1,3

Re: [SRM] clamav 0.94.x EOL

2009-10-08 Thread Tomasz Papszun
On Wed, 07 Oct 2009 at 14:47:21 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: Just in case the stable release managers what to do something about it and don't know about this yet, clamav upstream are taking some interesting measures to encourage people to upgrade from the now EOLed 0.94.x series. The mail isn't

Re: [SRM] clamav 0.94.x EOL

2009-10-08 Thread Bastian Blank
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 12:25:51PM +0200, Tomasz Papszun wrote: Sorry, it may seem a little harsh, Why? but the reason is that unless the majority of ClamAV users upgrade to = 0.95.x, old freshclams will put an excessive load on ClamAV database mirrors

Bug#549902: marked as done (nmu: pdftk_1.41+dfsg-2)

2009-10-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 08 Oct 2009 14:14:54 +0200 with message-id 877hv6krpd@pindar.marcbrockschmidt.de and subject line Re: Bug#549902: nmu: pdftk_1.41+dfsg-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #549902, regarding nmu: pdftk_1.41+dfsg-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Re: [SRM] clamav 0.94.x EOL

2009-10-08 Thread Tomasz Papszun
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 at 13:09:02 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 12:25:51PM +0200, Tomasz Papszun wrote: Sorry, it may seem a little harsh, Why? Well, from the Paul's message I had an impression he felt so :-). but the reason is that

Processed: closing 548969

2009-10-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: close 548969 Bug#548969: nmu: libtorrent-rasterbar_0.14.6-1 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Cristian Greco cristian.deb...@gmail.com End of message, stopping

Re: [Pkg-clamav-devel] [SRM] clamav 0.94.x EOL

2009-10-08 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 12:25:51 +0200 Tomasz Papszun to...@lodz.tpsa.pl wrote: On Wed, 07 Oct 2009 at 14:47:21 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: Just in case the stable release managers what to do something about it and don't know about this yet, clamav upstream are taking some interesting measures to

Re: [SRM] clamav 0.94.x EOL

2009-10-08 Thread Bastian Blank
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 02:11:39PM +0200, Tomasz Papszun wrote: On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 at 13:09:02 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 12:25:51PM +0200, Tomasz Papszun wrote: Sorry, it may seem a little harsh, Why? Well, from the Paul's message I had an impression he felt so

Bug#548969: nmu: libtorrent-rasterbar_0.14.6-1

2009-10-08 Thread Cristian Greco
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 08:26:21AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:57:33PM +0200, Cristian Greco wrote: nmu libtorrent-rasterbar_0.14.6-1 . ia64 mips mipsel powerpc sparc . -m build against boost1.40 Scheduled. Having it in testing does not really hurt because the

Bug#550191: wireshark 1.0.2-3+lenny6 security fixes

2009-10-08 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 11:26 +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote: Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Severity: normal [...] Could you please allow uploading wireshark 1.0.2-3+lenny6 to stable-security? It fixes security issues only: If you want to upload to

Hinting amarok/taglib-extras/taglib to testing?

2009-10-08 Thread Modestas Vainius
Hello, could somebody look at amarok / taglib-extras / taglib migration to testing? Unless I'm missing something, they are all ready, but still stuck for some reason and, unfortunately, [1] does not make much sense. Probably, britney is confused about Breaks: libtag-extras0 I added to

Re: [SRM] clamav 0.94.x EOL

2009-10-08 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On 2009-10-07, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote: Just in case the stable release managers what to do something about it and don't know about this yet, clamav upstream are taking some interesting measures to encourage people to upgrade from the now EOLed 0.94.x series. The mail isn't fully