Dear Release Team,
I'm in the process of implementing symbol versioning for the FFmpeg
library. This work is done in coordination with upstream, but as FFmpeg
is a rather complex set of libraries, this (probably) needs to be done
in coordination with the Debian Release Team as well.
Short recap:
[Arthur de Jong]
I it OK to upload this to proposed-updates?
Did you get any feedback on this? This issue is one of the blocking
issues for the next Debian Edu release, and thus it would be nice to
know the timeline for a fix in Lenny. :)
Happy hacking,
--
Petter Reinholdtsen
--
To
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 17:22 +0200, Yavor Doganov wrote:
This is the same issue and fix as reported in #560185.
Please approve, thanks.
Please go ahead.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 16:36 +0200, Yavor Doganov wrote:
Please approve a stable update to fix CVE-2007-1084 (#556271).
According to the bug reporter (Michael Gilbert) this is not a severe
problem (no DSA will be issued), but fixes for stable and oldstable are
warranted.
Please go ahead.
Hi,
On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 11:35 -0300, Maximiliano Curia wrote:
I've been looking at bug #545358, it's a bug that only affects lenny, making
system-tools-backends quite useless (and also network-admin, shares-admin and
time-admin from gnome-system-tools).
By quite useless I mean,
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 20:23 +0100, Maximilian Gass wrote:
I prepared a fix for the roundup regression that was introduced by a security
update. A member of the security team suggested I use p-u for this:
[...]
I have attached the source package diff for your review. If this is okay, I
will
On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 09:33 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Saturday 28 November 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
Unless there are objections I will also backport the changes for Etch as
that version has the same issues and I think it's worth having the
better support for installs from archive.d.o after
[CC list trimmed]
Hi,
On Sun, 2009-11-29 at 12:30 +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
A)
* Fix in stable
(This will probably not break any existing configurations, it will just
keep links that were removed before)
Pro: would help fast
Pro: no side effetcs
Con: does it break
On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 18:39 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Hi,
I have just uploaded a few packages meant for lenny.
glib2.0 (2.16.6-3) stable; urgency=low
[...]
totem (2.22.2-6) stable; urgency=low
[...]
gnome-system-tools (2.22.0-4) stable; urgency=low
For the record, these have all
On Sunday 13 December 2009, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
My only comment was that the diffs would have been easier to review
without so many whitespace changes. :-)
Yes. As explained in my initial mail, that was a deliberate choice to
decrease the risk of errors by removing them and to make
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 554447 RM: electricsheep/2.6.8-9
Bug #554447 [release.debian.org] electricsheep broken for new installations on
lenny
Changed Bug title to 'RM: electricsheep/2.6.8-9' from 'electricsheep broken
for new installations on lenny'
tags
retitle 554447 RM: electricsheep/2.6.8-9
tags 554447 - moreinfo
thanks
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 15:53 -0500, Roberto C.Sánchez wrote:
Hi. My apologies for not responding earlier. I think that removal from
Lenny is the best thing, for two reasons:
1. The new electricsheep package depends on
Hi,
On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 13:55 +0200, Modestas Vainius wrote:
several users have been bugging me to fix #512847 [1]. Current amarok version
in lenny does not display anything in the Wikipedia tab because wikipedia has
changed its site layout a bit since 1.4.10 release. The patch to fix this
Hello,
On sekmadienis 13 Gruodis 2009 19:33:01 Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 13:55 +0200, Modestas Vainius wrote:
several users have been bugging me to fix #512847 [1]. Current amarok
version in lenny does not display anything in the Wikipedia tab because
wikipedia
Hi,
On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 22:44 +, Arnaud Cornet wrote:
Le vendredi 13 novembre 2009 à 13:28 +, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
Do you consider that all of the bugs in question are important enough to
be fixed in stable with no likelihood of breaking existing
installations? The comments
On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 15:02 -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 17:40 -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
Now that I have uploaded dovecot 1.2.8, dovecot-antispam will need a
binNMU to continue working properly. (See bug #544588 for
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hi,
Please remove kcheckgmail from testing and stable.
The package is currently useless because gmail broke the login interface.
I've filed #561059 against the package to track it.
I'll try to get the new
Raphael Geissert wrote:
Hi,
Hi
Please remove kcheckgmail from testing and stable.
The package is currently useless because gmail broke the login interface.
removal hint added.
I've filed #561059 against the package to track it.
I'll try to get the new version which fixes the issue in
As libiw29-udeb has been replaced by libiw30-udeb, it is my
understanding that netcfg might need a binNMU.
Unless this is done, D-I is not buildable in unstable.
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Christian Perrier wrote:
As libiw29-udeb has been replaced by libiw30-udeb, it is my
understanding that netcfg might need a binNMU.
Unless this is done, D-I is not buildable in unstable.
binNMUs scheduled.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
20 matches
Mail list logo
