Bug#562096: pu: package openttd/0.6.2-1+lenny1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi, The openttd package contains a remote crash vulnerability that is easily exploited. Upstream will fix the bug in its upcoming release. Since that will be released in a few days, I will not

Re: SRM update request: gnash (Re: Any hope of an gnash update in Lenny?)

Hi, I've just upload gnash (0.8.4-3~lenny1) to stable-proposed-updates. cheers, Holger P.S.: for -edu: an upload to our lenny-test will follow... signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#562096: pu: package openttd/0.6.2-1+lenny1

Hi, On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 17:32 +0100, Matthijs Kooijman wrote: The openttd package contains a remote crash vulnerability that is easily exploited. Upstream will fix the bug in its upcoming release. Since that will be released in a few days, I will not provide complete details on the exploit,

Re: [Pkg-electronics-devel] geda-examples REMOVED from testing

On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 07:40:17AM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: Hamish Moffatt wrote: On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 04:39:20PM +, Debian testing watch wrote: FYI: The status of the geda-examples source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1:1.4.3-1

Re: binNMU request to correct libc dependencies for udebs

On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 00:20 +0100, Frans Pop wrote: There are only a few udebs left that still depend on libc6 rather than libc6-udeb. In most cases the reason is simply that they have not been uploaded since glibc got support for creating the correct dependencies. A binNMU should solve

Re: [Pkg-electronics-devel] geda-examples REMOVED from testing

Hamish Moffatt wrote: On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 07:40:17AM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: Hamish Moffatt wrote: On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 04:39:20PM +, Debian testing watch wrote: FYI: The status of the geda-examples source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: