Hi all,
Joerg Jaspert wrote:
I expect the services on it to be back in action somewhere during the
Saturday, at latest Sunday.
That is good news. Forgive me if this has been considered or decided already,
or even talked about somewhere that I missed - but will all packages that were
uploaded
Thijs Kinkhorst th...@debian.org writes:
That is good news. Forgive me if this has been considered or decided
already, or even talked about somewhere that I missed - but will all
packages that were uploaded to sid before the outage, have been aged so
that they are ready to migrate once
On sneon 3 April 2010, Russ Allbery wrote:
Thijs Kinkhorst th...@debian.org writes:
That is good news. Forgive me if this has been considered or decided
already, or even talked about somewhere that I missed - but will all
packages that were uploaded to sid before the outage, have been aged
also sprach Andreas Barth a...@not.so.argh.org [2010.04.03.0957 +0200]:
Can we please have the full information in order to schedule the
necessary binNMUs? Thanks.
After further investigation, it seems that the problem was specific
to the NMU package, which was never uploaded. I don't remember
* martin f krafft (madd...@madduck.net) [100403 10:06]:
also sprach Andreas Barth a...@not.so.argh.org [2010.04.03.0957 +0200]:
Can we please have the full information in order to schedule the
necessary binNMUs? Thanks.
After further investigation, it seems that the problem was specific
Dear RMs and interested maintainers (in Bcc)
What follows is the list of netcdf build-depending packages currently in the
archive. The netcdf4 package is available in experimental since a while
and currently at RC3 stage. It will be released quite soon and appears in
good shape for Debian, after
* Francesco P. Lovergine (fran...@debian.org) [100403 15:35]:
As always, if RMs or others had something to say about/against this
mini-transition,
please speak now :-)
Please give us a few days time to see where the loss of ries for more
than a week leaves us. You'll get another answer
Your message dated Sat, 3 Apr 2010 16:17:50 +0100
with message-id dcb580150704ed446c0ddba41760efa0.squir...@adsl.funkybadger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#576196: RM: phpgroupware/1:0.9.16.012+dfsg-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #576196,
regarding RM: phpgroupware/1:0.9.16.012+dfsg-10
to be
Thijs Kinkhorst th...@debian.org writes:
On sneon 3 April 2010, Russ Allbery wrote:
I don't think that's a very good idea. The primary purpose of the
aging is to give unstable users a chance to catch significant bugs
before the packages go to testing, and no one has been testing them
while
please unblock latest klibc for testing.
it has lots of fixes, see
http://www.itp.tuwien.ac.at/~mattems/blog/2010/03/15#klibc_1.5.6
http://www.itp.tuwien.ac.at/~mattems/blog/2010/03/20#klibc_1.5.17
request is acked with fjp and thus ok for debian-boot, see
10 matches
Mail list logo
