Making auto decruft easier for us and the release team

Hi! I think that the decrufting of our archive is done rather suboptimal for both of us, the ftp-team as well as the release-team. I'm not yet sure, how things can be done easier, so I guess the best thing to start discussing it, is describing how things are don currently. So, what is

Re: Making auto decruft easier for us and the release team

Hi, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl schrieb: The problems arise, when there are still some packages (build-)depending on the binary packages to be removed. I guess the correct thing for broken build-depends is to fill RC bugs against the affected packages, as they are (defacto) FTBFS. I've given

Pushing the iPhone/iPod stack into Squeeze

Hi, It looks like the iPhone/iPod stack will need some hints to make it to Squeeze. The stack comprises libplist, libimobiledevice, ifuse and usbmuxd. Currently the blocker seems to be libimobiledevice; it looks like a hint is needed as libiphone needs to be replaced by libimobiledevice in

Re: Pushing the iPhone/iPod stack into Squeeze

Le jeudi 22 avril 2010 à 17:55 +0200, Julien BLACHE a écrit : What should have been a seamless and entirely self-contained transition fell victim to portability issues in libplist, a rogue upload of a newer libimobiledevice version complete with a soname bump and GNOME packages starting to

Re: Pushing the iPhone/iPod stack into Squeeze

Hi, On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 17:55 +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote: It looks like the iPhone/iPod stack will need some hints to make it to Squeeze. The stack comprises libplist, libimobiledevice, ifuse and usbmuxd. usbmuxd has already transitioned, fwiw. Currently the blocker seems to be

Re: Pushing the iPhone/iPod stack into Squeeze

Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: Hi, usbmuxd has already transitioned, fwiw. Yes, it's low enough in the stack that it wasn't affected by the libplist issues. A more immediate issue is the libimobiledevice{0,1} rename. libimobiledevice0 needs decrufting, which can't currently

Bug#577791: marked as done (RM: apq (testing); RoM; blocks removal of gnat-4.3)

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2010 20:35:14 +0100 with message-id 1271964914.32043.1549.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net and subject line Re: Processed: Removal request for apq-postgresql (testing) has caused the Debian Bug report #577791, regarding RM: apq (testing); RoM; blocks

NEW changes in proposedupdates

Processing changes file: apache2-mpm-itk_2.2.6-02-1+lenny3+b1_alpha.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: apache2-mpm-itk_2.2.6-02-1+lenny3+b1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: apache2-mpm-itk_2.2.6-02-1+lenny3+b1_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: