Re: Making auto decruft easier for us and the release team

2010-04-23 Thread Joerg Jaspert
So, I'm open for ideas how to improve the workflow and making it easier for the release team and us (especially for me ;) We could add an option --verbose to cruft-report that actually runs the suggested commands with the --no-action option added (but only if the command is actually doing an

Re: Making auto decruft easier for us and the release team

2010-04-23 Thread Torsten Werner
Joerg Jaspert schrieb: And if one made sure no-action actually follows its name. :) I am not aware of any problems in 'dak rm --no-action'. What's wrong with it? Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Re: transition: proposal libpt2.6.5-libpt2.6.6 libopal3.6.6-libopal3.6.7

2010-04-23 Thread Craig Southeren
As one of the maintainers of the upstream (opal ptlib), please feel free to email me if I can help Craig On 24/04/2010, at 12:26 PM, Mark Purcell m...@debian.org wrote: On Sunday 07 March 2010 09:35:22 Mark Purcell wrote: I have started some work on the new upstreams, in

Re: transition: proposal libpt2.6.5-libpt2.6.6 libopal3.6.6-libopal3.6.7

2010-04-23 Thread Mark Purcell
On Saturday 24 April 2010 13:26:20 Craig Southeren wrote: As one of the maintainers of the upstream (opal ptlib), please feel free to email me if I can help Craig, Thanks for the offer. I do have one question/ request of upstream. Does the soname for ptlib/ opal need to change with every