Hello,
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 2:47 AM, Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org wrote:
Quoting Paul Wise (p...@debian.org):
Hi all,
Would it be possible to unblock busybox? It has been waiting for 117
days with no RC bugs. If it is not unblocked then there will be no
udhcpc/udhcpc packages in
On Sun, 2010-06-20 at 04:23 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 2:47 AM, Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org wrote:
Quoting Paul Wise (p...@debian.org):
Hi all,
Would it be possible to unblock busybox? It has been waiting for 117
days with no RC bugs. If it is not
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 574356 + pending
Bug #574356 [release.debian.org] RM: eclipse -- RoM; incompatible with stable's
xulrunner, not easily fixable
Added tag(s) pending.
tags 586139 + pending
Bug #586139 [release.debian.org] RM: eclipse-cdt -- RoM; depends on
Your message dated Sun, 20 Jun 2010 15:35:15 +0100
with message-id
1277044515.31635.20.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net
and subject line Re: Bug#557194: RM: libnet-google-perl/oldstable -- ROM; SOAP
search API retired, renders package unusable
has caused the Debian Bug report #557206,
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 21:39:41 (CEST), Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Short status update:
all three relevant (source) packages have been uploaded now:
- jack-audio-connection-kit
- jackd2
- jackd-defaults
The transition can be started by processing them from new. I'd suggest
to process
Processing changes file: nut_2.2.2-6.5_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: tar_1.20-1+lenny1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: pyftpd_0.8.4.6+lenny1_powerpc.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
I thought you might like some idea of what's going on with grub2, since
it's one of the RC bug hotspots.
You could be forgiven for looking at the RC bug activity over the last
couple of days and thinking that it's all gone to hell in a handbasket
with recent uploads. In fact, aside from an
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:31:03AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
I'm not entirely impressed with testing switching over to this new
scheme in advance of the default boot loader supporting it, but I guess
that's just how things work out sometimes and I realise there was a long
delay between
Processing changes file: linux-2.6_2.6.26-24_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oqwbc-0003kf...@ries.debian.org
9 matches
Mail list logo