On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 10:48:16PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
It's only 3-5 packages more, the rest is either already in volatile,
packages which could simply drop the clamav support or which should
be removed entirely. I'd propose to remove all rdeps from testing
for now, most of the
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 21:08:49 +0100, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
joystick has not migrated yet, for a reason I didn't spot originally -
ltsp-client depends on inputattach | joystick, and neither package now
exists on s390.
Indeed, I've just submitted a bug on ltsp-client to
Hi
It would be a good choice having GDAL library migrating to 1.7 series
- already available in experimental since ages - in squeeze. It would
involve the following packages:
dans-gdal-scripts
libgdal-grass
grass
thuban
qgis
xastir
mapserver
merkaartor
qlandkartegt
mapnik
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 18:14:45 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 11:05:54AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 01:28:46 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
A new upstream release that provides versionned symbols has been released
(6b1) and I have
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 12:41:14PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
I'd say just bump it to 6b1 to avoid spurious ld.so warnings. If
there's no other change than the versioning in the new libjpeg then it
will go in testing in 10 days so shouldn't hold up too much stuff.
I reached the same
Hi,
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 22:47:45 -0300
Mauro Lizaur deb...@cacavoladora.org wrote:
Python-twitter doesn't seem to be on shape to be released, since the last
commit is
from 06/13 and there isn't a single line regarding oauth.
Also the author from oauth-python-twitter (which can be integrated
Le mercredi 30 juin 2010 à 12:47 +0900, Hideki Yamane a écrit :
Hi,
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 22:47:45 -0300
Mauro Lizaur deb...@cacavoladora.org wrote:
Python-twitter doesn't seem to be on shape to be released, since the last
commit is
from 06/13 and there isn't a single line regarding
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 08:56:51AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 10:48:16PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
It's only 3-5 packages more, the rest is either already in volatile,
packages which could simply drop the clamav support or which should
be removed entirely. I'd
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 07:21:17PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
I don't really care what happens to new packages in volatile. This is
mostly about the removal from Squeeze.
RMs; the most important packages (clamav and dansguardian) are already
available on volatile. The rest are fringe
On Saturday, June 26, 2010 03:46:46 pm Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
one thing that isn't clear for me, what is (or is there any) opinion
from doko / POX on this?
I proposed the (optional and stripped down) X-Python-Version /
X-Python3-Version field.
To be honest, all we want to know is if
10 matches
Mail list logo
