Moin,
just finished an upload of a new (minor) upstream PDL version, package built
fine on all architectures.
This release fixes many bugs (most tracked on upstream's sf.net tracker),
brings big improvements on the documentation side, and has a more reliable
test suite.
Could you unfreeze
On 08/20/2010 03:04 AM, Joel Roth wrote:
1) Fix the problem upstream (easy, as I am the upstream author) and
svn-upgrade to a new major version.
2) Provide a patch for the current release and bump the Debian
version suffix.
The second option is enough to fix the problem. Please update
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 11:51:49 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
Please allow this package into Squeeze to address this bug for the
release.
Unblocked.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 08/20/2010 12:04 AM, Roland Stigge wrote:
2.5.4-2 has just been accepted.
Unblocked.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On 19.08.2010 20:47, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le jeudi 19 août 2010 à 18:36 +0200, Guido Günther a écrit :
It fixes a great deal of important bugs against the package
and allows to run the GNOME desktop without hal. Are there any chances
to get this into squeeze? system-config-printer-kde has
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 05:17:32PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
I'm not sure there are any in the original, plugins and a greater
optimisation level certainly aren't things which will solve specific
problems. Could you highlight them for me?
Having these features available for developers,
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 18:36:18 +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
Hi release team,
system-config-printer in Squeeze is quiet outdated (1.0.0). I've prepared a
new
upstream version (1.2.3) in experimental some time ago:
http://packages.debian.org/experimental/system-config-printer
It
Hi,
Sorry for the delay. Is the correct revision to look from is r3051? If
so, then please upload.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hello Release Team,
Will it be okay to commit the attached patch and do an upload to unstable ?
This patch fixes a bug in apt-offline, DBTS #588908
This patch fixes a bug in apt-offline where in if the user passed in a path (a
directory) that contains sub-directories, apt-offline fails. The fix
Hi team,
I would like to request a freeze exception for gdcm 2.0.16-2. It is
currently missing on
- hppa because of http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=591648
- mips because of http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=591998
Both bugs will be fixed for squeeze AFAIK.
gdcm
Hello,
Sorry for cross-posting if not appropriate, I'm just preserving the e-mail
headers.
On Friday 20 August 2010 11:34:51 Neil McGovern wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 05:17:32PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
I'm not sure there are any in the original, plugins and a greater
optimisation
On 0, Ritesh Raj Sarraf r...@debian.org wrote:
+apt-offline (0.9.9squeeze1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Add less to Recommends because we depend on `less` to display the
+bug reports
Why recommend it if you depend on it?
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 11:34:51 (CEST), Neil McGovern wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 05:17:32PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
I'm not sure there are any in the original, plugins and a greater
optimisation level certainly aren't things which will solve specific
problems. Could you highlight
Hello Mehdi,
On Friday 20 Aug 2010 16:31:11 Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
+ * Add less to Recommends because we depend on `less` to display the
+bug reports
Why recommend it if you depend on it?
offline bug reports is one of the feature for apt-offline. If the --bug-reports
option was not
On Friday 20 Aug 2010 16:48:04 Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
offline bug reports is one of the feature for apt-offline. If the
--bug-reports option was not used (or no bug reports were found), `less`
invocation does not come into picture.
And adding support for `more` will be more appropriate as
On 08/20/2010 01:18 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
Hello Mehdi,
On Friday 20 Aug 2010 16:31:11 Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
+ * Add less to Recommends because we depend on `less` to display the
+bug reports
Why recommend it if you depend on it?
offline bug reports is one of the feature for
On 08/19/2010 11:07 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
tryton-{client,server} unblocked.
thanks.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
--
To
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 09:56:59 +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
Hi!
Please allow wesnoth-1.8 (1:1.8.3-3) to move over to squeeze.
-5 unblocked.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 17:07:22 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
After some discussion, we feel that the fact that runit-run can be
installed, and unless further manual action is taken, it will make the
computer unbootable to indicate that the package is unreleaseable.
It's not getting removed
On Friday 20 Aug 2010 16:49:33 Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
offline bug reports is one of the feature for apt-offline. If the
--bug-reports option was not used (or no bug reports were found),
`less` invocation does not come into picture.
Yes, I guess that. I'd prefer a Depends tbh.
Okay! Done.
On 08/20/2010 02:00 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
On Friday 20 Aug 2010 16:49:33 Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
offline bug reports is one of the feature for apt-offline. If the
--bug-reports option was not used (or no bug reports were found),
`less` invocation does not come into picture.
Yes, I guess
Hi
I've just uploaded phpmyadmin 4:3.3.5.1-1 for which I would like to get
freeze exception. The changelog is:
* New upstream security release (CVE-2010-3055, CVE-2010-3056).
I know this is new upstream release, however it only addresses security
bugs and contains no other changes and I don't
martin f krafft wrote:
Nobody yet knows how long the freeze will last, so it might be worth
now to expend the effort to put in there a version of Git you are
ready to support for 2–3 years.
Thanks for the advice. I have put together a rough package, which
can be found here:
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 14:10:02 (CEST), Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 19/08/2010 14:00, Benjamin Drung wrote:
It looks ok but I don't see any announce for 1.1.3 yet.
1.1.3 is released now. We have prepared 1.1.2-2 in our git repository.
You can find the changes there [1]. Instead of just
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 13:07:46 +0200
Reinhard Tartler siret...@debian.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 11:34:51 (CEST), Neil McGovern wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 05:17:32PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
I'm not sure there are any in the original, plugins and a greater
optimisation
On 08/20/2010 03:25 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 14:10:02 (CEST), Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 19/08/2010 14:00, Benjamin Drung wrote:
It looks ok but I don't see any announce for 1.1.3 yet.
1.1.3 is released now. We have prepared 1.1.2-2 in our git repository.
You can
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 14:30:34 +0200, Michal Čihař wrote:
Hi
I've just uploaded phpmyadmin 4:3.3.5.1-1 for which I would like to get
freeze exception. The changelog is:
* New upstream security release (CVE-2010-3055, CVE-2010-3056).
Unblocked (and aged by Adam).
Cheers,
Julien
Hi,
I would like to request a freeze exception for two kfreebsd packages:
- kfreebsd-8 8.1-5: it only contains minor fixes needed for
debian-installer plus a security fix.
- freebsd-manpages 8.1-1: this one is a new upstream version that has
just been uploaded, but it only contains
Quoting Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk):
Hi,
The new version of rescue fixes an RC bug (#505111) but is currently
blocked from migrating due to being on the needs approval udeb list.
Would it be possible to unblock and migrate the package currently? If
not, please let us know
Hello,
2010/8/20, Neil McGovern ne...@debian.org:
I don't think that stable is the place for doing active development.
Are you saying that we are developing an operating system which is not
suitable for active development, or that it shouldn't be made suitable
for active development?
If it's
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 16:14:11 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Hi,
I would like to request a freeze exception for two kfreebsd packages:
- kfreebsd-8 8.1-5: it only contains minor fixes needed for
debian-installer plus a security fix.
Unblocked.
- freebsd-manpages 8.1-1: this one is
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 12:40:05 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Hi team,
I would like to request a freeze exception for gdcm 2.0.16-2. It is
currently missing on
- hppa because of http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=591648
- mips because of
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 15:42:31 -0400, Eric Cooper wrote:
Version 4.5-1 of approx, which I just uploaded to DELAYED/1, fixes two
important bugs (#589937 and #593428). Each fix is only one line.
Please consider allowing it into testing during the freeze. Thank you.
Unblocked.
4.5-1 is
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 00:53:37 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
(I'm not subscribed to the list, please CC me.)
Hi,
I'm currently preparing a new version of my package 'zathura'. To fix
#593552 I've added a manpage which gets built with rst2man. But this
adds a build-dependency to
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 19:41:23 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
4.5-1 is also modifying an earlier changelog entry, though...
I asked for some advice on -mentors before doing this, and got mixed
answers (http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2010/07/msg00290.html).
In the end, I thought the
Processing changes file: ghostscript_8.62.dfsg.1-3.2lenny5_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ghostscript_8.62.dfsg.1-3.2lenny5_alpha.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ghostscript_8.62.dfsg.1-3.2lenny5_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
I'd like to request two freeze exceptions: qpdf 2.2.0-1 and tiff
3.9.4-3.
For tiff, there are no code changes from 3.9.4-2. I just fixed up
requires, conflicts, etc., to bring it up to standards 3.9.1. (I didn't
want to combine that with the security fix that was in 3.9.4-2 and was
uploaded
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Please unblock package libmoose-perl, version 1.09-2.
The -2 upload adds a patch by Niko Tyni to deal with the FTBFS
on ia64; the change
Arthur Loiret aloi...@debian.org writes:
Hello,
2010/8/20, Neil McGovern ne...@debian.org:
I don't think that stable is the place for doing active development.
Are you saying that we are developing an operating system which is not
suitable for active development, or that it shouldn't be
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 16:27:13 -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
I'd like to request two freeze exceptions: qpdf 2.2.0-1 and tiff
3.9.4-3.
For tiff, there are no code changes from 3.9.4-2. I just fixed up
requires, conflicts, etc., to bring it up to standards 3.9.1. (I didn't
want to
Hi Release Team,
[I asked you about this issue at DebConf10 and was told to ask via
e-mail again, hence my mail]
Squeeze will support Python 3.1 as the first Python 3.X version in
Debian. Unfortunately, we didn't have much time to start preparing
packages with 3rd party modules/extensions for
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 08:10:18AM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 08/20/2010 03:04 AM, Joel Roth wrote:
1) Fix the problem upstream (easy, as I am the upstream author) and
svn-upgrade to a new major version.
2) Provide a patch for the current release and bump the Debian
version
Please take this request seriously. Even if Squeeze is frozen,
distributing the same version (1.0.x) of Wine as Lenny does not look
good! People are trying to help out!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Den 21. aug. 2010 03:01, skrev Svante Signell:
Please take this request seriously. Even if Squeeze is frozen,
distributing the same version (1.0.x) of Wine as Lenny does not look
good! People are trying to help out!
I wouldn't hold much hope. These are the options:
1. Get wine-gecko built on
44 matches
Mail list logo
