Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Please, unblock drupal6-mod-masquerade 1.4-1.
* New upstream release, contains security fixes.
* Updated Standarts-Version.
According to the upstream Changelog,
Fix CSRF vulnerability. See SA-CONTRIB-2010-068 - Masquerade - Cross
Site Request
Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:32:30 +0200
with message-id 4cb5608e.7030...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#600032: unblock: cloog-ppl 0.15.9-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #600032,
regarding unblock: cloog-ppl 0.15.9-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:36:10 +0200
with message-id 4cb5616a.8000...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#600044: unblock: tuxguitar/1.2-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #600044,
regarding unblock: tuxguitar/1.2-7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
tags 600018 + confirmed
thanks
On 10/12/2010 10:46 PM, David Paleino wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hello RT,
I have a new upstream version of python-bottle (0.8.4, currently 0.8.2-1 in
sid
and 0.8.3-1 in experimental), which fixes a couple of bugs. Not much
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 600018 + confirmed
Bug #600018 [release.debian.org] Pre-upload approval for python-bottle/0.8.4-1
Bug #600019 [release.debian.org] Pre-upload approval for python-bottle/0.8.4-1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
Added tag(s) confirmed.
thanks
Stopping
Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:42:13 +0200
with message-id 4cb562d5.1010...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#600046: unblock: drupal6-mod-masquerade/1.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #600046,
regarding unblock: drupal6-mod-masquerade/1.4-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you
On 10/12/2010 11:29 AM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
ping.
Can you give us more details about
unrelated to that, plymouth has still some unfixed open issues (most
prominently echo mode when using gmd), so i'm fine with removing it.
?
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 11:25:55PM +0200, Ricardo Mones wrote:
Hi Adam,
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 08:22:12PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 21:11 +0200, Ricardo Mones wrote:
Though not RC, this upload will fix two bugs, one of them important
because it
On 10/12/2010 12:33 AM, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Today I noticed that libcgi-application-extra-plugin-bundle-perl
does not declare the copyright and license on two icons packaged with
one of the components. I have raised #599794 to indicate this. There
is currently a version 0.2 in experimental.
Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:57:51 +0200
with message-id 4cb5667f.1090...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#599770: unblock: episoder/0.6.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #599770,
regarding unblock: episoder/0.6.5-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2010 10:00:22 +0200
with message-id 4cb56716.8020...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#599781: Please unblock: ipsec-tools/racoon 1:0.7.3-12
has caused the Debian Bug report #599781,
regarding Please unblock: ipsec-tools/racoon 1:0.7.3-12
to be marked as done.
Processing changes file: poppler_0.8.7-4_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: poppler_0.8.7-4_alpha.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: poppler_0.8.7-4_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: poppler_0.8.7-4_arm.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
close 599857
Bug#599857: unblock: librmagick-ruby/2.13.1-2
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Vincent Fourmond
fourm...@debian.org
thanks
Stopping processing
On 10/13/2010 09:46 AM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Can you give us more details about
unrelated to that, plymouth has still some unfixed open issues (most
prominently echo mode when using gmd), so i'm fine with removing it.
#595178, which i could at forst not reproduce, but then turned out to be
a
What would be the version of the resulting upload?
Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 10/12/2010 12:33 AM, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Today I noticed that libcgi-application-extra-plugin-bundle-perl
does not declare the copyright and license on two icons packaged with
one of the components. I have raised
On 10/13/2010 10:31 AM, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
What would be the version of the resulting upload?
Given the diff between 0.1 and 0.2, I'd say 0.1.1.
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Quoting Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk):
So that just leaves us with the question of whether we want to
reintroduce an orphaned leaf package. Admittedly, if the FTBFS hadn't
lain unattended for a few months then it might never have been removed
in the first place...
FOr this, I
retitle 600018 unblock: python-bottle/0.8.4-1
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags 600018 freeze-exception
thanks
Hello,
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:38:34 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 10/12/2010 10:46 PM, David Paleino wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 600018 unblock: python-bottle/0.8.4-1
Bug #600018 [release.debian.org] Pre-upload approval for python-bottle/0.8.4-1
Bug #600019 [release.debian.org] Pre-upload approval for python-bottle/0.8.4-1
Changed Bug title to 'unblock:
Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2010 10:58:14 +0200
with message-id 4cb574a6.2050...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#600018: Pre-upload approval for python-bottle/0.8.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #600018,
regarding unblock: python-bottle/0.8.4-1
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2010 10:58:14 +0200
with message-id 4cb574a6.2050...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#600018: Pre-upload approval for python-bottle/0.8.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #600018,
regarding unblock: python-bottle/0.8.4-1
to be marked as done.
This means that
Is downgrading the bug report and just waiting for the freeze to lift an
option?
Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 10/13/2010 10:31 AM, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
What would be the version of the resulting upload?
Given the diff between 0.1 and 0.2, I'd say 0.1.1.
attachment: nicholas.vcf
On 10/13/2010 11:11 AM, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
I would also like to draw your attention to #593102 . I don't know
why the complete absence of one of the components counts as a minor
bug.
I might be wrong but do you want to have 0.2 in Squeeze? Please note
that 0.2 will never land in
I would also like to draw your attention to #593102 . I don't know why
the complete absence of one of the components
counts as a minor bug.
Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Is downgrading the bug report and just waiting for the freeze to lift
an option?
Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 10/13/2010 10:31 AM,
On 10/13/2010 11:41 AM, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Mehdi, When 0.2 was built there was a hope of getting it into
squeeze. I can understand if the boat was missed on that a long time
ago.
The issue with #593102 is that the usptream component has an odd
layout and so needed to be repacked to
Mehdi,
When 0.2 was built there was a hope of getting it into squeeze. I
can understand if the boat was missed on that a long time ago.
The issue with #593102 is that the usptream component has an odd
layout and so needed to be repacked to build correctly. If we produce a
0.1.1 that
Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2010 12:11:08 +0200
with message-id 4cb585bc.2090...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#599779: unblock: libapache-authenhook-perl
2.00-04+pristine-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #599779,
regarding unblock: libapache-authenhook-perl 2.00-04+pristine-2
to be
On 10/11/2010 12:23 AM, Jon Dowland wrote:
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 03:34:28PM +0200, Michael Schuerig wrote:
The man-page for ecryptfs-setup-private mentions options
-a, --all-home Generate a setup for encrypting the user's entire
home directory
However, the script itself does not
Okay I will produce a 0.1-1. I just realized that I had no involvement
in 0.1 and so I could not make it a 0.1.1. Of course Jaldhar will still
have his say but I cannot see why he should object.
Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 10/13/2010 11:41 AM, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Mehdi, When 0.2 was built
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Hi! Please consider unblocking openvpn. It fixes and RC bug, a bug in one of
Debian's patches (IPv6) and some other fixes in the upstream release.
Thanks,
Alberto
openvpn
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Hiya, please consider unblocking netkit-tftp. The last uploaded added
IPv6 support which is quite a nice feature (and a release goal :)
Thanks,
Alberto
Here's the changelog:
Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org writes:
On 10/13/2010 11:41 AM, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Mehdi, When 0.2 was built there was a hope of getting it into
squeeze. I can understand if the boat was missed on that a long time
ago.
The issue with #593102 is that the usptream component has an odd
Hi Mehdi,
these vulnerabilities are fixed in 3.6.2 ! If this freeze exception
whould be accepted they go into testing-stable.
Greetings,
Raphael
2010/10/12 Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org:
On 10/12/2010 06:43 AM, Raphael Bossek wrote:
Hi release team,
whould be nice if bugzilla 3.6.2.0-3
Please don't worry about 0.2+. I'll make sure that the bugs do not slip
back in.
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org writes:
On 10/13/2010 11:41 AM, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Mehdi, When 0.2 was built there was a hope of getting it into
squeeze. I can understand
On 10/12/2010 02:08 PM, Ralph Amissah wrote:
Severity: normal
Please unblock sisu 2.7.6 for Squeeze.
Unblocked.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On 10/13/2010 02:00 PM, Raphael Bossek wrote:
Hi Mehdi,
these vulnerabilities are fixed in 3.6.2 ! If this freeze exception
whould be accepted they go into testing-stable.
Ok. It would have been nice to put this information in the bugreport and
close it.
How well the migration between
On 10/13/2010 02:13 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 10/13/2010 02:00 PM, Raphael Bossek wrote:
Hi Mehdi,
these vulnerabilities are fixed in 3.6.2 ! If this freeze exception
whould be accepted they go into testing-stable.
Ok. It would have been nice to put this information in the bugreport and
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 23:15:48 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Please unblock package ia32-libs and ia32-libs-gtk
Some more questions now that 20101012 has been uploaded:
- what's the point of the ia32-libs-dev package? nothing seems to
depend on it, and it didn't exist on amd64 until
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 14:43:50 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 12:15:45 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
It's a side-effect of
libpq5 |8.4.4-1 | unstable | hurd-i386
(and similar for all the other architecture-dependent packages)
I filed 599804
retitle 596733 unblock: ncbi-tools6/6.1.20090809-2
tags 596733 + confirmed
thanks
On 10/03/2010 10:56 PM, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org writes:
No, sorry.
That's fair; I'll plan to go through backports, then. Should I upload
any of the packaging changes to unstable,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 596733 unblock: ncbi-tools6/6.1.20090809-2
Bug #596733 [release.debian.org] unblock: ncbi-tools6/6.1.20100808-1 (as -2)
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: ncbi-tools6/6.1.20090809-2' from 'unblock:
ncbi-tools6/6.1.20100808-1 (as -2)'
tags
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi!
Please unblock package e16 As it fixes two release critical bugs. I testet
all upgrade path I could think of and didn't encounter any problems.
Changelog follows:
* QA upload.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package nagvis. It fixes an installation error if installed
with a remote database (otherwise user will have to read the readme and
configure it by hand):
*
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org writes:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 23:15:48 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Please unblock package ia32-libs and ia32-libs-gtk
Some more questions now that 20101012 has been uploaded:
- what's the point of the ia32-libs-dev package? nothing seems to
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 16:12:13 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org writes:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 23:15:48 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Please unblock package ia32-libs and ia32-libs-gtk
Some more questions now that 20101012 has been
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package grass, uploaded in today. This is mainly a
localization fix with a few selected fixes taken from the final 6.4.0
release. Note that -2 is in experimental
Hi. I need to do an upload for a krb5 security issue. However there
are a couple of other changes I could include. I'd recommend all, but
it's late enough I want explicit OK before everything besides the
security fix. I've pushed the actual diffs to the release-review branch
on the debian
On 10/13/2010 12:15 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 10/11/2010 12:23 AM, Jon Dowland wrote:
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 03:34:28PM +0200, Michael Schuerig wrote:
The man-page for ecryptfs-setup-private mentions options
-a, --all-home Generate a setup for encrypting the user's entire
home directory
Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2010 17:01:59 +0200
with message-id 4cb5c9e7.4090...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#600084: unblock: nagvis/1.4.6-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #600084,
regarding unblock: nagvis/1.4.6-1.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Hi Daniel,
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 14:37:25 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
On 10/07/2010 11:13 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
Why?
see previous mail, there were other fixes, i don't want to backport them
and in will not suport, if at all (see below), anything before -14 in an
upcoming stable
On 10/13/2010 06:06 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
That one is fixed for me with -9.1, which I uploaded to tpu. I'll try
to go through the changes between -9 and -16 later to see what else
should be backported.
Hopefully that'll resolve your concern and we can keep plymouth in
squeeze,
On 10/13/2010 06:09 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
That one is fixed for me with -9.1, which I uploaded to tpu. I'll try
to go through the changes between -9 and -16 later to see what else
should be backported.
thanks, uploaded -17 to unstable with your fix.
Hopefully that'll resolve your concern
Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2010 18:18:57 +0200
with message-id 4cb5dbf1.7000...@debian.org
and subject line Re: Bug#599058: permission to upload plymouth/0.8.3-14 to
unstable.
has caused the Debian Bug report #599058,
regarding remove plymouth from testing
to be marked as done.
This means
On 01/-10/-28163 08:59 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
The funny thing is that patch was the first commit after 0.8.3 tag in
upstream's Git repository.
the sad thing is, lacking a 0.8.4 release which is long overdue, there
are many more things to cherry pick, check the ubuntu package.
--
Address:
On 10/13/2010 06:27 PM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
On 01/-10/-28163 08:59 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
The funny thing is that patch was the first commit after 0.8.3
tag in upstream's Git repository.
the sad thing is, lacking a 0.8.4 release which is long overdue,
there are many more things to
On 10/13/2010 06:26 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
That's not the sad part. The sad part is that there many things to
cherry pick and the maintainer doesn't seem to care because he is too
busy re-packaging and he was taking Squeeze's users as hostages and didn't
want to fix that tty-related bug.
...
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 20:02 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 07/10/2010 16:39, Ernesto Hernández-Novich wrote:
It will take me a couple of days before I either upload 7.8.24-2 (hi
gregoa!) or ask for webgui's removal from Squeeze.
Well, I think that there is point in waiting for a couple
On 10/13/2010 12:24 PM, Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta wrote:
Hi! Please consider unblocking openvpn. It fixes and RC bug, a bug in one of
Debian's patches (IPv6) and some other fixes in the upstream release.
Thanks,
Alberto
openvpn (2.1.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
close 600062
Bug#600062: unblock: openvpn/2.1.3-1
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta
a...@inittab.org
thanks
Stopping processing here.
On 10/13/2010 07:22 PM, Ernesto Hernández-Novich wrote:
Finding a security issue on 7.9 could perhaps be backported, but once
7.10 comes out I wouldn't be so sure. I agree it's better to remove
7.8.24 from Squeeze, so please go ahead with that.
Done.
Too bad the release of 7.9 happened a
Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2010 19:48:52 +0200
with message-id 4cb5f104.2030...@debian.org
and subject line Re: Bug#600066: unblock: netkit-tftp/0.17-18
has caused the Debian Bug report #600066,
regarding unblock: netkit-tftp/0.17-18
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2010 19:51:30 +0200
with message-id 4cb5f1a2.8050...@debian.org
and subject line Re: Bug#600080: unblock: e16/1.0.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #600080,
regarding unblock: e16/1.0.0-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
On 10/13/2010 04:59 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
Hi. I need to do an upload for a krb5 security issue. However there
are a couple of other changes I could include. I'd recommend all, but
it's late enough I want explicit OK before everything besides the
security fix. I've pushed the actual
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:49:35 +0200
Ricardo Mones rica...@mones.org wrote:
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 11:25:55PM +0200, Ricardo Mones wrote:
Hi Adam,
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 08:22:12PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 21:11 +0200, Ricardo Mones wrote:
Though not
Hi
I unblocked pdsh as it fixes an RC bug:
+pdsh (2.18-8) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Drop broken runtime check for the genders library (closes: #598393)
+
+ -- Brian Pellin bpel...@debian.org Fri, 01 Oct 2010 19:49:13 -0500
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi
I unblocked sks as it fixes an RC bug and some other nasty bugs:
+sks (1.1.1+dpkgv3-5) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * add nostrip to DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS on architectures with ocaml
+bytecode. (closes: 599029)
+ * don't depend on mta etc., as mailsync is now mostly obsolete (closes:
+
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 20:10:33 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Hi
I unblocked sks as it fixes an RC bug and some other nasty bugs:
+sks (1.1.1+dpkgv3-5) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * add nostrip to DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS on architectures with ocaml
+bytecode. (closes: 599029)
NAK, the fix is
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 11:51 PM, Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org wrote:
On 10/13/2010 08:09 PM, Deepak Tripathi wrote:
Team,
As discussed previously, please unblock libaddressable-ruby, This is
new package and run time dep for libdataobjects-ruby which will close
On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 20:01 +0200, Ricardo Mones wrote:
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:49:35 +0200
Ricardo Mones rica...@mones.org wrote:
Unexpectedly this change has introduced a serious bug: #600047
I'll fix it ASAP and prepare a -4 version today.
Which is accepted now:
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 19:19 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 06:49:42PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 19:10 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
Also note, that due to a mistake in the 4.4.11.6 release, some necessary
changes were left out (namely
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package nodm
nodm was kept out of testing because of outdated binary packages for
kfreebsd-*. This was due to #575265. That bug was fixed by no longer
building for these
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Team,
Please unblock mantis/1.1.8+dfsg-8
Closes bugs:
#599710 CVE-2010-3303
#599846 Updated Czech translation of mantis po-debconf
Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2010 20:58:30 +0100
with message-id 128610.28069.359.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#600111: unblock: nodm/0.7-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #600111,
regarding unblock: nodm/0.7-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 23:39 +0530, Deepak Tripathi wrote:
As discussed previously, please unblock libaddressable-ruby,
For those who don't remember the previous discussion,
libaddressable-ruby is currently in NEW, so needs accepting from there
by ftp-master before being unblocked.
This is new
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package ii-esu
The version of ii-esu in testing fails to build from source. The
changelog entry:
ii-esu (1.0a.dfsg1-3) unstable; urgency=low
* Fix FTBFS with newer gdc
On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 23:41 +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
Would it be possible to unblock xserver-xorg-video-geode 2.11.9-5 that
is currently sitting in unstable? Compared to 2.11.9-3, this package
contains two fixes for hardware support issues, plus it introduces
native support for one
Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2010 22:37:11 +0200
with message-id 4cb61877.5040...@debian.org
and subject line Re: Bug#600115: unblock: mantis/1.1.8+dfsg-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #600115,
regarding unblock: mantis/1.1.8+dfsg-8
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
uploaded, thanks so much for the prompt response!
Luk == Luk Claes l...@debian.org writes:
Luk On 10/13/2010 04:59 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
Hi. I need to do an upload for a krb5 security issue. However there
are a couple of other changes I could include. I'd recommend
Luk == Luk Claes l...@debian.org writes:
Luk On 10/13/2010 04:59 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
Hi. I need to do an upload for a krb5 security issue. However there
are a couple of other changes I could include. I'd recommend
all, but it's late enough I want explicit OK
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
libapache-authenhook-perl logs passwords in Apache's error.log if the
log level is = info[1]. I prepared an update for Lenny including the
same patch used for testing/unstable (already
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please consider unblocking openarena 0.8.5-5, which fixes a reasonably common
server crash with a one-line patch. I don't think it's RC, but it'd be
an unfortunate bug to have in
[Sorry for not getting back to you sooner, and thanks for reminding me]
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 10:14 +0200, Harald Jenny wrote:
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 08:33:27PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[ Adding an amavisd-new-milter transitional package to amavisd-milter ]
Are the interfaces /
82 matches
Mail list logo
