Hi there,
My package was creating a symlink in /usr/lib/xen, and finally, I think
it was a bad idea (it broke some upgrades from Lenny in some servers of
mine in production). So I uploaded a fix that totally removes the
postinst of the package.
Note that I still think that Xen itself (the hypervi
On 12/17/2010 06:24 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 17.12.2010 15:16, tony mancill wrote:
>> On 12/13/2010 03:22 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> On 14.12.2010 00:19, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2010-08-08 at 17:21 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Matthias Klose:
>> For those who are in
On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 21:13 +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 22:58 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Or I might just have confused myself instead *sigh* If you were
> > suggesting uploading 0.29.5-2 with the shlibs change to use 0.29.3 and
> > then leaving it in unstable an
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 22:58 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Or I might just have confused myself instead *sigh* If you were
> suggesting uploading 0.29.5-2 with the shlibs change to use 0.29.3 and
> then leaving it in unstable and 0.29.3 in squeeze then yes, that would
> be fine.
Please give a qu
severity 594150 important
tag 594150 fixed-upstream
thanks
On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 23:25:47 +0530
Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Neil Williams
> wrote:
> >
> > I'm still dubious about this whole bug/patch - especially that this
> > entire process has been only
Your message dated Tue, 21 Dec 2010 19:13:25 +
with message-id <1292958806.8552.109.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#606533: unblock: postgrey/1.32-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #606533,
regarding unblock: postgrey/1.32-6
to be marked as done.
This means that
On Mon, 2010-12-20 at 20:56 +0100, Christian Kastner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 12/18/2010 02:46 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 17:26:22 +0100, Christian Kastner wrote:
> >
> >> Full debdiff attached.
> >>
> > Please go ahead.
>
> my co-maintainer prepared an upload over the week
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 19:30:42 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> unblock dbus/1.2.24-4
Done.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 21.12.2010 18:09, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 17:27:48 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
>> Please let me know, if you prefer a 1.2.24-4 upload with a cherry-pick of
>> only
>> the CVE fix or if a 1.2.26-1 upload including the other fixes, which seem
>> reasonable and relativel
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Neil Williams wrote:
>
> I'm still dubious about this whole bug/patch - especially that this
> entire process has been only tested against a single setup, the bug
> only shows up in a single frontend and the bug has not had any input
> from the maintainer who has b
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 17:27:48 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Please let me know, if you prefer a 1.2.24-4 upload with a cherry-pick of only
> the CVE fix or if a 1.2.26-1 upload including the other fixes, which seem
> reasonable and relatively small, would be ok.
>
Only the security fix, please
Hi release team!
A potential local DoS attack was found in dbus, which can lead to a crash of the
bus damon due to infinite recursion in the message validation.
The relevant CVE is CVE-2010-4352 , see
http://www.remlab.net/op/dbus-variant-recursion.shtml for more details.
For experimental the bu
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 16:45:32 +0100, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
> On 12/20/2010 05:38 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > What is "GPL-compliant lyrics" supposed to mean? Either they're free,
> > and there's no need to replace them, GPL or not. Or they're not free,
> > and we need to not ship them, i
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please unblock package chromium-browser
chromium-browser (6.0.472.63~r59945-4) unstable; urgency=high
* Backported security patche
On 12/20/2010 05:38 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> What is "GPL-compliant lyrics" supposed to mean? Either they're free,
> and there's no need to replace them, GPL or not. Or they're not free,
> and we need to not ship them, in which case a patch is not enough. I
> just don't get what the GPL has t
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package maint-guide
Under the announced rule of deep freeze, I understand only RC fixes are
allowed now. But people seem to be still translating and I have
accumulated 7 of
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:35:32PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> Right, I set #607472 to grave under the assumption that we want to
> drop libmail-spf-query-perl which would leave qpsmtpd without a
> dependency.
>
> I'm cc'ing the release team to get an opinion if this plan is ok.
I've deployed
17 matches
Mail list logo
