Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 613007 ftp.debian.org
Bug #613007 [release.debian.org] RM: debiandoc2dbxml/0.3
Bug reassigned from package 'release.debian.org' to 'ftp.debian.org'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
613007:
Dear RM,
please consider the attached diff for deluge in Squeeze.
The upload would fix #602613 (although the bug isn't easily
reproducible on all systems). Code for the fix is a backport from the
1.3.x release made by upstream on explicit request (so the version in
unstable isn't affected).
The
On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 12:39 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
Now that squeeze is out, I'd like to move from GMP 4 to GMP 5. The
latter was released upstream about a year ago and the gmp lists
aren't buzzing with outrageous bugs, so it appears stable enough.
Looking at the package names of the
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 13:55 +0100, Cristian Greco wrote:
please consider the attached diff for deluge in Squeeze.
The upload would fix #602613 (although the bug isn't easily
reproducible on all systems). Code for the fix is a backport from the
1.3.x release made by upstream on explicit
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 23:45 +0200, Modestas Vainius wrote:
so I'm turning this thread into a bug report. My requests are below.
Three would have been better; one package per report is much easier to
keep track of. (As would using X-Debbugs-CC so the mail on the list
actually had the bug
Hello,
On šeštadienis 12 Vasaris 2011 18:27:58 Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Three would have been better; one package per report is much easier to
keep track of. (As would using X-Debbugs-CC so the mail on the list
actually had the bug number).
Sorry, will try to do better next time.
More
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 19:49 +0200, Modestas Vainius wrote:
On šeštadienis 12 Vasaris 2011 18:27:58 Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Three would have been better; one package per report is much easier to
keep track of. (As would using X-Debbugs-CC so the mail on the list
actually had the bug number).
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 07:49:53PM +0200, Modestas Vainius wrote:
Are most themes targeted at either KDE3 or KDE4, or would they usually
be expected to work with both?
KDE 3 themes do not work with KDE 4. Afaik, many icons were renamed to comply
with some XDG standard. So that's where
Dear stable release managers,
I would like to fix a bug in partconf, which prevent installing a MIPS
machine using preseeding, as it's not possible to change the default
values of two debconf questions.
Please consider the diff below for partconf in stable.
Aurelien
diff --git
Hello,
Late in the release cycle we found out that a kernel bug prevents
sparc machines with ATI graphics adapters using atyfb driver from
booting due to problems with console handover, causing it to hang
early during the boot (http://bugs.debian.org/602853). I thought
that this can be worked
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 22:40:29 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Dear stable release managers,
I would like to fix a bug in partconf, which prevent installing a MIPS
machine using preseeding, as it's not possible to change the default
values of two debconf questions.
Please consider the
Hello folks,
I have prepare some branches that has what I am intending to upload to
stable-proposed-updates. The modules I have changed are the following:
grub-installer
linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6
tasksel
cdebconf
debootstrap
kernel-wedge
Please take a look and comment on those. If you think
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 10:46:07PM +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Hello folks,
I have prepare some branches that has what I am intending to upload to
stable-proposed-updates. The modules I have changed are the following:
grub-installer
linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6
This should probably be
Hi,
Could someone bump openssl's priority so it migrates to testing
sooner? It fixes a security issue.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Hi,
I would like to upload version 1.0.0(d) to unstable soon. It
changes soname, but as far as I know the API is still compatible
with the old one, and you should be able to rebuild everything
against the new version.
I wonder if I need to upload an openssl098 source package at
the same time to
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 00:24:18 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Hi,
Could someone bump openssl's priority so it migrates to testing
sooner? It fixes a security issue.
done.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 23:13 +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
I have prepare some branches that has what I am intending to upload to
stable-proposed-updates. The modules I have changed are the following:
The below shouldn't be assumed to be an ack or nack for the particular
uploads at this point.
Hi,
On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 14:04:49 +
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 13:55 +0100, Cristian Greco wrote:
please consider the attached diff for deluge in Squeeze.
The upload would fix #602613 (although the bug isn't easily
reproducible on all
18 matches
Mail list logo
