Re: CEGUI library transition

2011-02-16 Thread Muammar El Khatib
Hi Julien, On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:41:20AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 00:16:15 +0100, Muammar El Khatib wrote: Now, I have packaged the new version and I decided to change the names of the binary packages like I show below: libcegui-mk2-0.7.5

Bug#613723: pu: package sun-java6/6.22-1

2011-02-16 Thread Torsten Werner
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi, the version 6.24-1 of the package contains important security related bugfixes. I would take 6.24-1 from unstable and build a version 6.24-1~squeeze1 for stable. All the changes in the

Bug#613735: transition: gobject-introspection

2011-02-16 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi, I'd like to start the gobject-introspection transition. The chage is in the gir/typelib file format. This involves every gir1.0-* package, but since the package names have changed,

python-defaults update in Squeeze

2011-02-16 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
Hi, I backported some changes in python-defaults, the pycompile one should fix Lenny → Squeeze upgrades where administrator installed local version of Python (without my py_compile.py changes backported from Python 3.2 in Debian) Can I upload it? -- Piotr Ożarowski

Re: python-defaults update in Squeeze

2011-02-16 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 23:16:23 +0100, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: Hi, I backported some changes in python-defaults, the pycompile one should fix Lenny → Squeeze upgrades where administrator installed local version of Python (without my py_compile.py changes backported from Python 3.2 in

Re: python-defaults update in Squeeze

2011-02-16 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
[Julien Cristau, 2011-02-16] I backported some changes in python-defaults, the pycompile one should fix Lenny → Squeeze upgrades where administrator installed local version of Python (without my py_compile.py changes backported from Python 3.2 in Debian) Care to explain why this is

[SRM] (PRSC) Possible removal of tsclient from stable

2011-02-16 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Hi, tsclient was removed from unstable recently: it has two CVE reports pending and no upstream. The rationale was that a suitable replacement, remmina, is in the archive. Since remmina is also in stable, I propose to remove tsclient from stable too, which gets these security problems out of the

Bug#613741: opu: package sun-java6/6-24-0lenny1

2011-02-16 Thread Torsten Werner
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: opu Hi, please have a look at http://people.debian.org/~twerner/ for an (security) update of sun-java6 in oldstable. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: [SRM] (PRSC) Possible removal of tsclient from stable

2011-02-16 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 16/02/11 22:57, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: tsclient was removed from unstable recently: it has two CVE reports pending and no upstream. The rationale was that a suitable replacement, remmina, is in the archive. Since remmina is also in stable, I propose to remove tsclient from stable too,