Hi!
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
Work on that direction has already started some time ago, when Eckhart sent
those wishlist mails to the maintainers of the related packages.
Please, see http://wiki.debian.org/kdelibs4c2aRemoval and
http://wiki.debian.org/qt3-x11-freeRemoval
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 614888 + lenny
Bug #614888 [release.debian.org] RM: pixelpost -- RoQA; unused, unmaintained,
multiple security issues
Added tag(s) lenny.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
614888:
I've prepared an upload to stable for package dajaxice, since
python-django was patched for problems related with crsf cookies,
dajaxice is unusable in squeeze.
The pacth comes from upstream developer as you can see in Ubuntu bug.
Any change for this to be accepted?
--
Angel Abad
Sorry for duplicate attachment.
Thanks!
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
On Thu, February 24, 2011 10:16, Angel Abad wrote:
I've prepared an upload to stable for package dajaxice, since
python-django was patched for problems related with crsf cookies,
dajaxice is unusable in squeeze.
Was this issue introduced as a side-effect of the changes in DSA-2163-1,
2011/2/24 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk:
Hi,
On Thu, February 24, 2011 10:16, Angel Abad wrote:
I've prepared an upload to stable for package dajaxice, since
python-django was patched for problems related with crsf cookies,
dajaxice is unusable in squeeze.
Was this issue
Hi,
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011, Steve Langasek wrote:
A virtual package is a good idea, though - in fact, it's such a good idea
that I remember now we discussed this back at DebConf and I'd subsequently
forgotten about it. Thanks for jogging my memory! :) Yes, whether or not
we add support in a
Le mercredi 23 février 2011 à 13:52 -0800, Steve Langasek a écrit :
Although the paths in which libraries will ultimately be installed for
multiarch is not yet entirely settled, one thing that is clear is that on
i386, we almost certainly will not be using the path which has been enabled
in
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 03:11:52 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Hi!
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
Work on that direction has already started some time ago, when Eckhart sent
those wishlist mails to the maintainers of the related packages.
Please, see
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 614726 with 614952 614953 614954 614956 614957 614958
Bug #614726 [release.debian.org] FFmpeg 0.6 transition
Was blocked by: 614727 612482 554340 554310 614725 614446
Added blocking bug(s) of 614726: 614952, 614958, 614953, 614957, 614954,
Hi,
just to let you know a bit in advance, the following packages should
be mostly ready to transition in like a week:
- pixman
- libdrm
- mesa
- xorg-server
- xorg
- many many too many xserver-xorg-{input,video}-*
As “usual” it's pretty much self-contained. The worrying bits are:
-
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 614310 ftp.debian.org
Bug #614310 [release.debian.org] release.debian.org: apt source
stable-updates uses squeeze-updates as suite name in release file
Bug reassigned from package 'release.debian.org' to 'ftp.debian.org'.
thanks
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was
jcris...@debian.org).
usertag 609913 pu
Bug#609913: Consider fixed munin-package for 6.0.1
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: pu.
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 609913 pu
tag 609913 moreinfo
kthxbye
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 20:00:17 +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
clone 609900 -1
retitle -1 Consider fixed munin-package for 6.0.1
reassign -1 release.debian.org
thanks
I'm not seeing a proposed
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 24. Februar 2011, Julien Cristau wrote:
retitle -1 Consider fixed munin-package for 6.0.1
I'm not seeing a proposed change, tagging moreinfo.
munin | 1.4.5-3 | squeeze | source, all
munin | 1.4.5-3 | wheezy | source, all
munin | 1.4.5-3
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 16:38:59 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
- xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: It needs a kernel = 2.6.34 as
documented in its README.Debian, so having it in testing without a
matching kernel will cause some issues to nouveau users. They can
still switch to the fbdev
* Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br [2011-02-12 22:46]:
I have prepare some branches that has what I am intending to upload to
stable-proposed-updates. The modules I have changed are the following:
There are two more updates I'd like to see in 6.0.1:
- libdebian-installer: I added a
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 18:10, Martin Michlmayr t...@cyrius.com wrote:
* Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br [2011-02-12 22:46]:
I have prepare some branches that has what I am intending to upload to
stable-proposed-updates. The modules I have changed are the following:
There are two more
* Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br [2011-02-24 18:28]:
Please preparae and push the respective squeeze branches so we start
uploading soon.
They should be there already (unless I made a mistake with git).
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org (24/02/2011):
- xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: It needs a kernel = 2.6.34 as
documented in its README.Debian, so having it in testing without a
matching kernel will cause some issues to nouveau users. They can
still switch to the fbdev driver until
On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 21:12 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[debian-devel dropped from Cc as it didn't seem relevant to the mail]
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 12:06 +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
It is here: http://release.debian.org/transitions/ffmpeg.html
AFAIUI all packages marked red in the
On Sun, 2011-02-20 at 16:42 +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
We would like to push the following changes to 6.0.1 to fix a problem
with not waiting long enough for SCSI subsystem to be initialized, and
disk detection failing in d-i on the first try as a result. These have
been committed to the
On Sat, 2011-02-19 at 04:48 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 01:39:39PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Have any of the reverse-dependencies been test-built against the new
version? Does the move to 5.0.1 imply any source changes being required
for reverse-dependencies,
On 24.02.2011 21:15, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
Matthias also responded requesting:
I see that both the runtime library and the -dev packages have
different package names. But to be able to still use gmp3 for
existing GCC versions, please change the source name too, such
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 22:15 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 24.02.2011 21:15, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
Matthias also responded requesting:
I see that both the runtime library and the -dev packages have
different package names. But to be able to still use gmp3 for
Dear Release team,
I inadvertently started a speech-tools + festival transition, and made
some errors in my previous upload. The current situation in unstable
is:
- libestools2.1-dev is the new development package
- libestools2.1-dev provides libestools2.0-dev for facilitating binNMUs
- lmms and
Quoting Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org):
Please take a look and comment on those. If you think anything is
missing please say so.
Is there any chance we can update the apt-setup debconf templates to
stop talking about volatile?
As people probably noticed, I haven't managed to get
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 08:15:44PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2011-02-19 at 04:48 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 01:39:39PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Have any of the reverse-dependencies been test-built against the new
version? Does the move to
28 matches
Mail list logo
