Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 614726 with 614458 606717
Bug #614726 [release.debian.org] FFmpeg 0.6 transition
Was blocked by: 614958 554340 614996 554310 614725 614954 614727 614952 612482
614953 614446 614957 614956
Added blocking bug(s) of 614726: 606717 and 614458
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 614726 with 614467
Bug #614726 [release.debian.org] FFmpeg 0.6 transition
Was blocked by: 614958 606717 554340 614458 554310 614996 614725 614954 614727
614952 612482 614953 614957 614446 614956
Added blocking bug(s) of 614726: 614467
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 614726 with 554061 614433 614447 555784 614457 556672
Bug #614726 [release.debian.org] FFmpeg 0.6 transition
Was blocked by: 614958 554310 614725 614467 614727 612482 614953 606717 554340
614458 614996 614954 614952 614957 614446 614956
Hi,
I read developers-reference but what I am seeing is a bit dirrefent.
Read on
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 09:26:01PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 09:36:30PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
stable-proposed-updates is defined as:
Processing changes file: samba_3.5.6~dfsg-3squeeze2_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: samba_3.5.6~dfsg-3squeeze2_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: samba_3.5.6~dfsg-3squeeze2_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: samba_3.5.6~dfsg-3squeeze2_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 10:33:22PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
Well, I just uploaded 2.46 to stable for debian-reference. This seems to be
gone into stable-updates per some information I got as mail from Debian FTP
Masters as:
| Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 20:04:20 +
| From: Debian FTP Masters
On Tue, March 1, 2011 13:33, Osamu Aoki wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 09:26:01PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
every package will enter stable-proposed-updates first. Then, if it
warrants
an update outside of the normal point release cycle (and those are rare)
it
gets copied to
U kunt deze mail niet openen
http://www.allincom.biz/termico/index.php?a=termico-02-a-nlm=debian-release@lists.debian.org
Version française
http://www.allincom.biz/termico/index.php?a=termico-02-a-frm=debian-release@lists.debian.org
Termico voorkomt koude rillingen bij ontvangst van uw
Hi,
I see my confusion but I still need to clarify one thing.
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 02:28:23PM -, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
...
proposed-updates is not stable-updates.
OOps.
...
This is correct, as is the DDPO link. stable-proposed-updates and
proposed-updates are the same thing and
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:23:42AM +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 04:53, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
...
I know that I need to upload in time for the installer team to rebuild
the installer with the new kernel version, addressing the known issues
with
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 18:19, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:23:42AM +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
It depends on the ETA for 6.0.1. I'd a week before the targeted date
assuming it builds fine on all arches. For a confort level, I'd say a
cuple of weeks
On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 18:19 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:23:42AM +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 04:53, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
...
I know that I need to upload in time for the installer team to rebuild
the installer with
* Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk [2011-03-01 19:17]:
Otavio: other than lkdi and the d-i build itself (which I guess could be
a binNMU this time?)
It cannot be a binNMU since there are at least two changes in
debian-installer for squeeze.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
On Sun, 2011-02-20 at 17:20 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
britney1 and britney2 have different methods of determining whether a
package can be removed from testing, which recently led to britney2
removing a package when it shouldn't have. A patch which appears to fix
this is attached, the
On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 23:38 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Self-cluestick: b2 already has a get_full_tree method which iterates
reverse-dependency lists, so we should just use that. Updated patch
coming to a b2 tree near you soon.
Actually, it looks like get_full_tree() is hugely overkill in
It's always interesting to look at build logs, or to receive bug reports of the
form
CC
compiler error message
or
CCLD
linker error message
without knowing how the compiler or the linker were called. Maybe it is
convenient for a package maintainer watching the build scrolling by
I'll make gcc-4.5 the default for (at least some) architectures within the next
two weeks before more transitions start. GCC-4.5 is already used as the default
compiler for almost any other distribution, so there shouldn't be many surprises
on at least the common architectures. About 50% of the
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktinddjpzvrqiw15n5vqwwdtmtzneevb8t5zhf...@mail.gmail.com
Am 02.03.2011 02:21, schrieb Matthias Klose:
The majority of quiet build logs comes from cmake based systems and (newer)
automake based systems, so maybe this could be handled by cdbs and debhelper
for
the majority of packages. Other proposals how to include the important
information would
On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 19:17 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 18:19 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:23:42AM +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 04:53, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
...
I know that I need to upload
On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 00:20 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 23:38 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Self-cluestick: b2 already has a get_full_tree method which iterates
reverse-dependency lists, so we should just use that. Updated patch
coming to a b2 tree near you soon.
On 2 March 2011 03:34, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote:
I'll make gcc-4.5 the default for (at least some) architectures within the
next
two weeks before more transitions start. GCC-4.5 is already used as the
default
compiler for almost any other distribution, so there shouldn't be many
22 matches
Mail list logo
