On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 22:46 +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I have prepare some branches that has what I am intending to upload to
stable-proposed-updates. The modules I have changed are the following:
grub-installer
Doesn't look like this got uploaded yet? The relevant fix is in
unstable but
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 05:18, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
...
That should be fine. That gives us time to include longterm release
2.6.32.30 and pick up a few other bug fixes.
It would be nice if it can be done before since I'll do a surgery on
26th and need to travel for it on
On 06/03/11 11:20 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
- anything I missed?
netcfg. #614884 blocks #606268 against network-manager. We have a
working solution with the two fixes I mentioned in 614884 and my
supplied patch for NM's ifblacklist_migrate.sh filed against 606268.
The NM bug is RC but had no
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 11:39 -0400, Ben Armstrong wrote:
On 06/03/11 11:20 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
- anything I missed?
netcfg. #614884 blocks #606268 against network-manager. We have a
working solution with the two fixes I mentioned in 614884 and my
supplied patch for NM's
On 06/03/11 12:08 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Well, having it fixed in unstable would be a good start. The problem
doesn't just affect stable so having the first time the patch is in the
archive be a stable point release isn't generally appropriate.
Where would one find the patch for #614884?
On 06/03/11 12:08 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Well, having it fixed in unstable would be a good start. The problem
doesn't just affect stable so having the first time the patch is in the
archive be a stable point release isn't generally appropriate.
The biggest barrier to this is that Matt said
Hey RT,
now that all the Xfce 4.8 bits have been accepted to experimental, we'd
like to upload to unstable. As it's a new major upstream release,
there's quite some dependencies involved, so I guess you're not against
having a little summary so we can coordinate that upload in order to not
break
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 15:20 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 22:46 +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I have prepare some branches that has what I am intending to upload to
stable-proposed-updates. The modules I have changed are the following:
grub-installer
Doesn't look
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 01:31 +0100, Christoph Egger wrote:
libsigsegv in unstable changes soname for the library so all depending
packages need to be rebuild. The depwait is needed as 2.9-1 misses the
actual shared library by accident (#616576) so packages build against
that version will link
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
I'd like to upload libvigraimpex 1.7.1, which has changed SONAME, to
unstable.
There is only one reverse-dependency, which will need binNMUs: lprof.
(I can schedule them myself if
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 01:31 +0100, Christoph Egger wrote:
libsigsegv in unstable changes soname for the library so all depending
packages need to be rebuild. The depwait is needed as 2.9-1 misses the
actual shared library by accident (#616576)
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 20:38 +0100, Christoph Egger wrote:
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
Other than the amd64 maintainer upload, clisp hasn't actually managed to
build anywhere yet, so can't be binNMUed. I've added the dep-wait for
it anyway, which means it will be
Hi,
I'd like to upload katoob 0.5.9.1-1.2+squeeze1.
It includes a fix for a crash upon start up.
Here's the output from debdiff:
diff -Nru katoob-0.5.9.1/debian/changelog katoob-0.5.9.1/debian/changelog
--- katoob-0.5.9.1/debian/changelog 2010-05-11 20:59:53.0 +0300
+++
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 22:57 +0100, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote:
Hi Adam,
On 6 March 2011 00:18, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
- Testing and unstable have tesseract 2.04-2.1, so the package for
stable would need to have a lower version than that. I'd suggest 2.04-2
Hi Adam,
On 6 March 2011 00:18, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
- Testing and unstable have tesseract 2.04-2.1, so the package for
stable would need to have a lower version than that. I'd suggest 2.04-2
+squeeze1, which is conventional.
Sure. This will be my first
Hi Adam,
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 22:17 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Any news on this?
I've branched, cherry-picked, built, and uploaded the package earlier
this evening. Let me know if there's anything else you need from me on
this.
Thanks,
Sean
signature.asc
Description: This is a
* Jeffrey Ratcliffe jeffrey.ratcli...@gmail.com, 2011-03-06, 22:57:
- It would be nice if the reasoning for the quilt build-dep bump was
mentioned. My suspicion is that this is due to the use of dh
--with-quilt triggering a lintian warning but this isn't really
necessary for stable as the
Hi,
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 23:36 +0100, Sean Finney wrote:
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 22:17 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Any news on this?
I've branched, cherry-picked, built, and uploaded the package earlier
this evening. Let me know if there's anything else you need from me on
this.
On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 22:21 +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
clive's support for youtube.com broke due changes to the web site. The
update adds (yet another) patch from upstream to accommodate for this
change.
I also included a change to d/rules taken from unstable to fix a FTBFS
when $HOME
title 616590 nmu various libapr1 rdeps on kfreebsd-*
thanks
I fear this affects more packages: I have looked at all packages that
depend on libapr1 or have libapache2 in their name. From those, I have
grepped for FILE_OFFSET_BITS in their newest kfreebsd build log. If I
didn't do something
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 616590 nmu various libapr1 rdeps on kfreebsd-*
Bug #616590 [release.debian.org] nmu: php5_5.3.5-1
Changed Bug title to 'nmu various libapr1 rdeps on kfreebsd-*' from 'nmu:
php5_5.3.5-1'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de writes:
I fear this affects more packages: I have looked at all packages that
depend on libapr1 or have libapache2 in their name. From those, I have
grepped for FILE_OFFSET_BITS in their newest kfreebsd build log. If I
didn't do something wrong, these
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote:
I'll make gcc-4.5 the default for (at least some) architectures within the
next
two weeks before more transitions start. GCC-4.5 is already used as the
default
compiler for almost any other distribution, so there
On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 02:34:01 +0100
Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote:
I'll make gcc-4.5 the default for (at least some) architectures
within the next two weeks before more transitions start. GCC-4.5 is
already used as the default compiler for almost any other
distribution, so there
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote:
I'll make gcc-4.5 the default for (at least some) architectures within th=
e next
two weeks before more transitions start. =A0GCC-4.5 is already used as th=
e default
compiler for almost any other distribution, so there
Processing changes file: dbconfig-common_1.8.46+squeeze.0_i386.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1pwpwd-0005im...@franck.debian.org
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 18:09, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
It looks like this got uploaded, but targeted at unstable where there's
already a newer version, so it got rejected:
Yes. I did it wrong :-( My fault.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
On 6 March 2011 23:56, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
Adam is correct, I bumped b-d to shut up lintian:
Thanks for confirming that.
Jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
28 matches
Mail list logo
