Le jeudi 21 juillet 2011 à 11:04 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine a écrit :
Hi RMs and d-g followers
I'm going to upload 1.8.7
Before doing that, if you don't mind, I would like to add symbol files
to the C library.
Sylvestre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi,
I uploaded opencv 2.3 with your provided patch to experimental.
Best regards,
Nobuhiro
2011/7/21 Nobuhiro Iwamatsu iwama...@nigauri.org:
Hi,
2011/7/20 Reinhard Tartler siret...@debian.org:
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 01:39:41 (CEST), Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
I plan to up-load opencv
Hi,
I'd like to have a sit down with relevant people to work out how we can
improve d-i and debian-cd handling for the next release. Please indicate
your availability at:
http://www.doodle.com/x2kit5h9zurfk6ss
Thanks,
Neil
--
vorlon We need a fresher website - WordPress is the perfect
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:16:59AM +0200, Neil McGovern wrote:
I'd like to have a sit down with relevant people to work out how we can
improve d-i and debian-cd handling for the next release. Please indicate
your availability at:
http://www.doodle.com/x2kit5h9zurfk6ss
To confirm, this is at
Otavio is happy for us to start building kernel udebs from linux-2.6,
with the following provisos:
1. Installer team members (initially Otavio, Joey and Colin) will need
commit access, to update the module selections for udebs.
2. The automatic inclusion of module dependencies sometimes results
* Neil McGovern (ne...@debian.org) [110728 12:32]:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:16:59AM +0200, Neil McGovern wrote:
I'd like to have a sit down with relevant people to work out how we can
improve d-i and debian-cd handling for the next release. Please indicate
your availability at:
I used some of Debcamp and Debconf time this year to discuss the
Debian Installer release process with some people and after talking
with many people it seems we agreed on the following changes on Debian
Installer release process and it would be interesting to receive
feedback on those to see if
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
openarena/0.8.5-5+squeeze1 fixes #635733, proposed diff attached.
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 at 14:11:47 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
ioquake3 1.36+svn1946-4 fixes a security vulnerability. In the
Hi!
I'm proposing to update procps in stable to have it support kernels
which advertise them as 3.0-something instead of 2.6.x-something
or 3.0.0-something. (There are some other packages that need
fixing, so this is a first step.)
The required patch has already landed in unstable (#632749), but
Hi,
as far as I understood those are the changes planned for d-i
(Otavio, please correct me where I'm wrong):
* d-i will use sid as a development platform:
- d-i in unstable will use unstable as its udeb source,
instead of testing which is the case today
- It will be binNMUed on all
Hi
I already mentioned this on IRC, but for good measure. I have put up a
draft for Release Goal documentation[1]. While I was writing it, I
realised that we encourage the usage of usertags and require that the
advocate to keep track of process...
So I figured we could do the advocates a
[Larger quote for new recipients]
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 16:10:09 +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
I get errors while scanning some files with ClamAV 0.97.1:
-
LibClamAV Error: Opcode 20 of type 0 is not implemented yet!
LibClamAV Warning: Bytecode 20 failed to run: Invalid argument passed
to
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 16:50, Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote:
...
* Later on d-i should be fixed not to have the Linux kernel and ABI
version hardcoded. This is not currently considered critical
because it does not happen too often. Some solution needs to be
found that provides d-i
Peter Palfrader asked me to fix #630606 in squeeze, as the large amount
of log messages is causing problems on some debian.org machines. I've
bodged it down to a reasonable level (one of these messages per key); it
probably ought to only log if no authorized_keys lines succeed or
something like
Hi!
Am 26.07.2011 12:27, schrieb Lionel Elie Mamane:
[..]
Given that the true sources seem to have disappeared, I suppose we
could consider the .sty file to be its own source; it is a stretch,
but removing unicode support for (La)TeX would be rather
... damaging. I really, really vote for
Processing changes file: foo2zjs_20090908dfsg-5.1+squeeze0_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qmwtc-0004su...@franck.debian.org
Processing changes file: phpmyadmin_2.11.8.1-5+lenny9_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openldap_2.4.11-1+lenny2.1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 07:21:39PM +0200, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
Am 26.07.2011 12:27, schrieb Lionel Elie Mamane:
Given that the true sources seem to have disappeared, I suppose we
could consider the .sty file to be its own source; it is a stretch,
but removing unicode support for
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 06:38:00PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Sec-team, has a proper CVE number been assigned for mentioning in the
changelog?
No, there hasn't been any CVE assignment.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011, Niels Thykier wrote:
I already mentioned this on IRC, but for good measure. I have put up a
draft for Release Goal documentation[1]. While I was writing it, I
realised that we encourage the usage of usertags and require that the
advocate to keep track of process...
On 0, Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011, Niels Thykier wrote:
I already mentioned this on IRC, but for good measure. I have put up a
draft for Release Goal documentation[1]. While I was writing it, I
realised that we encourage the usage of usertags and require
Hi everyone,
1) Include that license in debian/copyright, document which part it
applies to.
Just to make one thing clear. *I* will not go down this road. I will *never*
collect the license statements 15000+ files.
If you want this, please remove TeX from Debian and all will be happy.
I
22 matches
Mail list logo
