Hi Sylvestru,
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 12:57 AM, Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org wrote:
Dalibor Topic just replied through his blog to one of my question about
the update 27 of sun-java6 being available under the dlj license:
http://robilad.livejournal.com/90792.html
thanks for the
We just uploaded a new upstream to exp. Thus, no need to binNMU there
any more.
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer [ la...@debian.org ]
Ubuntu Developer [
Torsten Werner twer...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
rm of sun-java6 a target for wheezy if any security alerts come ?
I think we should remove it from unstable soon. It is a good question
What's the status of the free JVMs wrt JDBC4?
I know firsthand that JDBC4 doesn't work with OpenJDK6 while it
Le jeudi 25 août 2011 à 15:28 +0200, Julien BLACHE a écrit :
Torsten Werner twer...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
rm of sun-java6 a target for wheezy if any security alerts come ?
I think we should remove it from unstable soon. It is a good question
What's the status of the free JVMs wrt
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 15:31:56 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
Also, I think we still have a reason for +b(something) as sometimes we
just need to rebuild on a single architecture (because something
strange has happend there), and I don't want to get rid of that
ability.
The more I think
On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 10:42 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 21:57:22 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Obsolete binary packages in a configurable list of archive sections
[...]
are not automatically removed when the source package is
updated; instead they are kept in testing
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 19:42:24 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
The key question is whether we think it's enough of an issue that we
want to stay in compatible mode until we could implement something like
the opt-in model.
I'd say turn off compatible mode, and see if that ends up being an
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 12:13:47 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 02:03:58AM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
We would like to carry out a GNUstep transition
(libgnustep-base1.20-1.22; libgnustep-gui0.18-0.20) *and*
libobjc2-3, ideally coinciding with the migration of
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 08:49:03PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 19:42:24 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
The key question is whether we think it's enough of an issue that we
want to stay in compatible mode until we could implement something like
the opt-in model.
I'd
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 22:09 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 08:49:03PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 19:42:24 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
The key question is whether we think it's enough of an issue that we
want to stay in compatible mode until
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: britney
Tags: patch
Hi,
After a certain amount of head-desking when various things didn't work,
I'm finally happy enough with my improved auto-hinter functionality for
britney that I thought it
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 22:41 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
After a certain amount of head-desking when various things didn't work,
I'm finally happy enough with my improved auto-hinter functionality for
britney that I thought it should be in the BTS for others to pull
apart^W^Wcomment on.
+
Processing changes file: usbutils_0.87-5squeeze1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qwld6-fm...@franck.debian.org
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.0.0-3 to unstable on Friday or
Saturday.
This will include the fixes from stable release 3.0.3 and should fix the
FTBFS on mips mipsel.
There should be no ABI bump.
Ben.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 23:59 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
the way that excuses are generated means that either of these
forms are possible:
foo Depends: bar
foo/amd64 Depends: bar
but foo[/amd64] Depends: bar/amd64 will never be output. With that in
mind, I suspect we could drop the
15 matches
Mail list logo
