Bug#631019: HDF5 transition, the return!

2011-09-01 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Hello, I did many changes in the HDF5 libraries (including symbol files!). I will detail them later. As Julien requested, here is the list of the packages with their RCs bug ([] is none). Do I have to add them of dependency for this bug/transition ? cdo [] cgi-mapserver [] cgns-convert [] code-s

Bug#624807: libav 0.7 transition

2011-09-01 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 11:04:03PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 11:39:03AM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 08:07:00AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 05:10:38 (CEST), Andres Mejia wrote: > > > > > > > Has there

Re: [SRM] Uploading new upstream stable version to Squeeze?

2011-09-01 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 23:30 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 04:30:41PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Sat, 2011-08-13 at 14:47 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:48:51AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > > Given the timescales of the upcomin

Bug#638067: transition: evolution

2011-09-01 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 17.08.2011 00:07, schrieb Josselin Mouette: > The following packages will need to be updated to gtk+ 3 and > libedataserverui-3.0 later so that e-d-s 2.30 can be dropped: > * gnome-panel (will have its own transition) > * sflphone > * tracker I've updated tracker in the mean time. gnome-pan

Bug#624807: Upcoming Libav 0.7 transition

2011-09-01 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 18:46:27 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to ask for permission to start a new Libav (the new FFmpeg) > transition in unstable. The current package can be seen in experimental, > basically all libraries bumped SONAME, so that the new release is > co-instal

Re: ca-certificates version number reuse

2011-09-01 Thread Philipp Kern
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 01:35:51PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > ftpmasters: we would also need you to remove +nmu3 from the security archive, > wouldn't we? You just need to supersede the build with a newer version as Julien said. It won't be included in the packages file anymore and we coul

Bug#638067: marked as done (transition: evolution)

2011-09-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 1 Sep 2011 21:44:55 +0200 with message-id <20110901194455.gb2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr> and subject line Re: Bug#638067: transition: evolution has caused the Debian Bug report #638067, regarding transition: evolution to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Re: ca-certificates version number reuse

2011-09-01 Thread Raphael Geissert
[Re-adding some context for ftpmasters] On Thursday 01 September 2011 01:38:30 Julien Cristau wrote: > On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 07:30:24 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > > After the ca-certficates update to stable was installed into the archive, > > it was found out that its version number 20090814+